|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Jurassic Park III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 07-22-2001 04:25 PM
I think this movie is nothing more than a remake of just about every monster movie that's ever been made. If you go into it with that expectation you'll like it. If you want a good story or want to see great special effects forget it.The movie going public demands more sophistication when it comes to monsters, nowadays. Back in the days of King Kong, and later on, Godzilla it was enough to put a guy in a rubber suit and have him stomp around the stage. Later on, with the Sinbad movies people started wanting to see more realistic monsters. As monster movies progressed through the years, on up to the days of Alien, things were pretty much at a standstill as far as technology goes. When Alien came out, they upped the ante again. Ever since then the "curve" has been getting steeper and steeper. (Yes, I know Star Wars was a big breakthrough in special effects. It did contribute to the artform but it wasn't a monster movie so I don't include it in the timeline.) It just took more and more realism to get the audience involved. Now, I think that curve has reached another plateau. With movies like The Mummy Returns we are seeing the special moster effects getting just a bit cheaper. I wonder whether the effects are actually worse or whether the people are just getting used to seeing special effects like that and are able to "spot" them easier. No matter... if your taste is for seeing people get chewed up by dinosaurs this movie is for you. I did like the soundtrack. The surround sound effects when the plane flies overhead get a good reaction from the audience. I've seen that scene about 6 times by now and you can still feel the whole audience jump when the plane flies over. The bit with the cell phone ringing off in the distance was a good joke too! When you first hear it ring you start to think, "OK! Who's the ass hole who didn't turn his phone off before the movie started!" Then, one of the characters picks up the a cell phone and says, "Hello?" That one made me laugh. Maybe Speilberg took it a little too far with the guy getting eaten and subsequently shat-out but the ringing phone "gag" did entertain me. The one thing that bothered me is the idea that "All dinosaurs want to do is eat people". It's a bit of a stretch for me. I don't think dinosaurs would differentiate humans from any other source of food. As a matter of fact, I don't think a human would make a very satisfuing meal for a Tyranosaurus. I imagine that they'd go after something with a little more meat on its bones. Okay, if it wasn't for this there'd be no movie, right? The whole idea for this movie is a simple, "Stomp and Chomp", right? Overall I'd give this movie ** (I'd watch it because I can get in free.) Lost World would have gotten a *1/2 from me (I'd go see it only because my friends want to see it and I can get them in for free.) but Jurassic Park got a definate ***. (I might actually pay to see this movie.) I say this to put the movie in perspective with the other two J.P flicks... I liked it better than the second one but not as much as the first.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 07-23-2001 08:02 AM
Don said: "Our local competitor is running it. On day one they already scratched the print. Plus, imagine watching this fine family entertainment, only to be into reel 3 when the audio track becomes Spanish, and English subtitles run for the rest of the movie. Ha, and they just replaced the reels this weekend! The corker is that they were not telling the patrons about the mixup." Talk about "Film Done Wrong"! Scratching a brand new print is bad enough, but the hundreds of audience members they cheated with the subtitled Spanish print will probably think twice about going to a theatre again to see a movie. What a lack of Showmanship in the name of greed.  ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001
|
posted 07-23-2001 11:15 AM
" ... nothing more than a remake of just about every monster movie that's ever been made."Yeah, and A.I. is ruling the box office! Jurassic Park (the first) was loud. The Lost World was good -- it brought back the monster movie. Jurassic Park III is the best! And it's just the right length for a summer movie -- 90 minutes of fun. The stadium theater I go to made sure that the print was clean and the DTS sounded crisp. All the more enjoyable to see on a hot summer's day. See it -- it's GREAT! Don A: Which chain runs the theater that got a print with Spanish reels? The Film-Tech crew ought to know if this chain ever bothers to pre-screen a print for defects.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Worthing
Master Film Handler

Posts: 384
From: Hereford, UK
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 07-30-2001 04:30 AM
This film was the Worst film I have seen in a long time.It was the first time I have been to the cinema in a long time, (As a paying customer) by the end of the film I wished it had been a lot longer. When will Directors realise that the paying customer needs value for money in a film not some poor sequel. ***Surely there is more to life than special effects*** This film gets a mark from me.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 09-02-2001 03:32 AM
>>I saw this movie last night at AMC Stonebriar in Frisco,Texas. Would you believe that the audience gave this movie a big amount of applause at the end.<<Geez , those Texans, eh?  This is definately suffering from what I like to call 'Sequel-itis' and it's not showing any signs of healing up! I especially liked the scene where the dinosaur (T-rex?) managed to 'sneak' up on them and they only knew he was there because they could hear a cell-phone ringing which was inside the T-rex's stomach in some poor suckers pocket. Of course, if a T-rex was walking up to me...that'd be the first thing I heard.  It is short, but it's plenty thanks very much. Next time, try shooting with a SCRIPT! No wonder films don't last anymore... 2 good weeks (if you're lucky) and that's it! Only films with a half decent script have the legs to go the distance. I've said it before... SCRIPT, SCRIPT, SCRIPT! Everything else is secondary. They should be ashamed of themselves starting shooting on an incomplete script. There should be multiple drafts before shooting gets anywhere near starting. ------------------ "There's so much I don't know about Astro-Physics...wish I'd read that book by that wheel chair guy" Homer Simpson
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|