Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Lord of the Rings (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Lord of the Rings
John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-27-2001 03:58 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A few years ago, I had the pleasure of working with Peter Jackson promoting one of his movies...Meet The Feebles. If anyone has seen one of his early films they would agree he made the most violent, disgusting and gross films ever made bar none.

Peter, however, is the most timid, unassuming people I have met in the industry and is a professional. Period.

I wish him all the best and congratulate him on an excellent piece of storytelling in bringing to the screen what must have been one of the most difficult adaptions in recent memory.


 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-27-2001 07:18 AM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Meet the Feebles and Dead Alive are the two best motion pictures ever created by man. Everyone should take their mother to see them! And not the sissy rated-R versions available at Lackluster Video ... get the unrated version.

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-28-2001 11:46 AM      Profile for Greg Mueller   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Mueller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lord of the Rings

Boring

I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly why. I can't remember a scene that wasn't well done and lavish. Great scenery great cgi. I didn't care much for frough dough. I guess he's suppose to be a wuss. Does he ever get any back bone later on? There's too many scenes of his big blue eyes being afraid and him wimpering about wanting to be left alone. It was also way too long and judging from the rest of the audience, they thought so too. Maybe the sequels will explain why you have to sit through the acres of repetitive stuff in this film.
I guess what this film reminds me of the most is a combat type video game. It seems to have no point other than to go from one conflict with one type of underworld bad guy to the next. They should have a point meter in the corner of the screen.


------------------
Greg Mueller
Amateur Astronomer, Machinist, Filmnut http://www.muellersatomics.com/


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Beres
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 606
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-28-2001 03:08 PM      Profile for Joe Beres   Email Joe Beres   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Adam, i have to agree with you, I have enjoyed all of Peter Jackson's films. I can understand people not liking Bad Taste and Meet the Feebles (the most disturbing movie with puppets ever made), but you really can't beat the lawnmower scene in Dead Alive. (The finest gore film ever made in my opinion) Then Heavenly Creatures, one of my all time favorites, you must have a look at that one. The Frighteners, with Michael J Fox at his best, is one of the most underated films of the 90s. It's a fantastic old school sort of horror film, only with great special effects.

As far as Lord of the Rings is concerned, I really liked it. I haven't read the books either, and I had no problem following the plot or characters. They really do pack a lot of high points into a three hour movie though. I don't think the film could have been made better, but it still has some inherent problems, most of which are miostly forgiveable. CGI still looks like CGI, and the shrinking of the actors playing Hobbits was hard to get used to; it was pretty abvious that the scenes that involved hobbits and full-size actors were digitally manipulated and that the close up shots were not, making for some somewhat jarring cuts. Overall though, it was quite good. I have to give credit to a three hour film with 20 minutes of trailers that started at 10:15 that held my attention and didn't have me looking at my watch.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Harnden
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 107
From: Chandler, AZ, USA
Registered: Oct 2001


 - posted 12-28-2001 03:18 PM      Profile for Paul Harnden   Email Paul Harnden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dead Alive....oh hell yes!

 |  IP: Logged

John Anastasio
Master Film Handler

Posts: 325
From: Trenton, NJ, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 12-29-2001 08:19 PM      Profile for John Anastasio   Author's Homepage   Email John Anastasio   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just got back from seeing it in an absolutely packed house. I had to sit in the front row, but fortunately the beautiful curved screen had me feeling like I was sitting in an IMAX presentation and the picture was as sharp as a tack. The print was gorgeous and the showing was the best I've been to in a long time. I don't need to mention that the sound was astounding. I had read the books years ago, so it wasn't hard to follow the plot, but I can see where someone who hasn't read the novels might be confused by some of the names. I went in prepared to tear the film apart, but I honestly believe that it captured the character and color of Tolkien's work very well. As I watched, it was almost as if the mental images I had when I read the work originally were coming to life, so I thoroughly enjoyed his vision of the piece. When the film was finished, the audience actually stood up and applauded...and that's a RARE occurance here. I was intrigued by the subdued color in parts of it. Did they use the same silver process that was used in "Sleepy Hollow"? Some of it had that same look.

 |  IP: Logged

Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-03-2002 09:50 AM      Profile for Evans A Criswell   Author's Homepage   Email Evans A Criswell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Attendance: 2002/01/02 19:45, Carmike 10, Huntsville, AL, Auditorium 6, Scope, Dolby Digital/THX

I'm not sure why I waited so long to see this movie, but I'm glad I did. I got a showing that only had 30 to 40 people in it on a Wednesday night, in a 42 foot THX auditorium. I don't think I heard a single cell-phone or any distracting noises from anyone in there, which is extremely rare.

First, I've never read the books, so I was a bit worried that I would sit through a three hour movie that I wouldn't fully understand or enjoy. This movie, to me, will probably be a bit like the Star Wars movies. I never cared for the Star Wars movies until around 1997, then I loved them. Some movies take more than one viewing to fully understand and appreciate, and the Lord Of the Rings movies will probably be that way for me. There were lots of long-haired guys in the movie, and one or two of them could easily do drag and make great chicks. There was one in one scene that I had to study to figure out if it was male or female.

The sound was phenomenal. The clarity of the sound and the directional sound effects were excellent.

My heart sank a bit when the scope changeover occurred during the previews. After the changeover, the aperture plate was not in the proper position, causing the image to be about a foot and a half to the left, with the soundtrack visible a foot beyond the left screen edge and with the same amount of image blocked out on the right. I went out at the end of one of the previews, telling the audience I was going to get them to fix it, which they quickly did. I did not want to watch a 3 hour movie that way. What bothers me even more is that this happened the last time I saw a scope movie in auditorium 6 on August 24, 2001, and I'd hate to think that every scope movie has been shown that way since then.



 |  IP: Logged

John Lasher
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Newark, DE
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 01-28-2002 03:53 PM      Profile for John Lasher   Author's Homepage   Email John Lasher   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Regal People's Plaza 17, House #11, Dolby SRD.

As my grandmother used to say, a very expensive way to take a nap.

The thing I enjoyed most about this movie was finding $3 in my pocket (in quarters), walking out of the theater, buying a soda and walking back in. (Drink it slowly, John. Make it last.)

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-14-2002 07:00 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
3/14/2002, Cinemark 17, Springfield OR, #3, DTS. Excellent presentation, sharp, bright, steady, very good sound. About 25 people there. Print still looks like brand new (the theater GM says this print is 1 of the original 3 they received on the movie's opening day). Super-35 image is quite grainy sometimes.

Saw it again today, with a group who all wanted to see it once more before it leaves theaters (they are all game developers: graphic artists and programmers, and they are in awe of this movie). My 3rd time. Still holds up very well for me. I hope this wins some awards. And that's all I have to say about that.


 |  IP: Logged

Josh Kirkhart
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 165
From: Austin/Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2001


 - posted 03-15-2002 08:27 AM      Profile for Josh Kirkhart   Email Josh Kirkhart   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Shoulda waited til' the 29th for the replacement reel with the preview of the next installment. Supposedly it was pushed out to a thousand more theatres this week too make some cash from the nominations and publisize the new footage.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-06-2002 06:27 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, the DVD of LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring arrived in stores today. Lotsa people snapping up losta copies. If the way this DVD is moving off shelves here in Lawton is any indication, I expect this 2-disc set to displace others like "Shrek," "The Matrix," "Gladiator" and "Harry Potter" as the biggest selling DVD to date.

I'm surprised New Line managed to fit the entire theatrical cut of the flick onto a single disc. Of course, the 178 minute running time negated any other extras on Disc One, such as a commentary track. Video quality on the anamorphic widescreen version is pretty decent given all the challenging visual material. Still, some details get pretty soft at times. I'll bet the 4-disc Collector's Edition (which will spread the 30-minute longer cut across 2 discs) will have noticeably sharper image detail and better refinement of motion.

Audio on the disc (DD-EX 5.1) is excellent. I don't think I have any other DVDs in my collection featuring DD tracks with as powerful a bass response as this. It kind of makes me wonder just how much more over-the-top the sound will be on the 4-disc edition and its DTS-ES 6.1 Discrete audio track.

New Line has said that many of the extras used on the 2-disc edition will not be carried over to the 4-disc version. I guess they want you to spend a lot of cash for both. The 2-disc edition contains a $5 mail-in rebate off the 4-disc set.

If you liked the movie okay and want some new home theater demo material, then pick up the 2-disc set. Bigger fanatics of the movie will wait for the 4-disc version or perhaps buy both sets. The 4-disc verison will retail for $40, but sites like Amazon are offering pre-order discounted prices of $25. At least New Line isn't bending people over big time like Universal is doing with their $70 price to get the E.T. DVD theatrical cut.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 08-06-2002 10:05 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The best part about LOTR being released on DVD is that the stores stayed open till midnight last night, allowing people to pick up their copies of STAR TREK II a few hours early.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Haven
Master Film Handler

Posts: 300
From: fremantle, West Australia
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 08-08-2002 10:42 AM      Profile for Brad Haven   Email Brad Haven   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I rented the DVD today and i didn't enjoy it as much this time, i just felt that it wasn't meant for DVD at all, i kept having to squint my eyes to work out what was happening (i have a large w/s tv)and kept thinking i wish i could see this again on the big screen!.
It looked decent and sounded decent, but i just wasn't sold this time!.
I do however like this film and i feel in many years to come they (all three) will be seen as classics.

------------------
currently (relief)chief projectionist
at Luna Leederville cinemas
also cheerleader for john wilson (gooOO JOHN!)

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-08-2002 05:44 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,

I agree about the squinting part. This had to be one helluva hard title to encode in MPEG-2 and fit all 178 minutes on a DVD-9. Still, I prefer the widescreen version rather than watching it in "foolscreen".

I'll bet the upcoming 4-disc version will have quite an improvement on detail and sense of motion with the movie being spread across two discs. I just hope the "side break" happens at a sensible point.

 |  IP: Logged

Josh Jones
Redhat

Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 08-16-2002 11:21 AM      Profile for Josh Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Josh Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw this movie for the first time. Well worth the dollar fifty . I arrived just after work, and sat in an empty hous for an hour. 16 people showed up, and this same print has been running here for 7 months now! I really hate bitching, but it has to be said. The print was scratched from begining to end, at any give time there were atleast 6 thick black scrathces on screen. Ocasionally one would catch a dirty emulsion scratch. Focus was soft, even after I asked them to fix it. uneven focus and a flickering lamp. the print was so scratched, I'm surprised it tracked in dolby at all, but I never heard it drop out.

enough bitching for one day, now for the movie itself....

I liked it, but it gave me the creeps on the way home

Josh

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.