|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Lord of the Rings
|
John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 12-27-2001 03:58 AM
A few years ago, I had the pleasure of working with Peter Jackson promoting one of his movies...Meet The Feebles. If anyone has seen one of his early films they would agree he made the most violent, disgusting and gross films ever made bar none. Peter, however, is the most timid, unassuming people I have met in the industry and is a professional. Period. I wish him all the best and congratulate him on an excellent piece of storytelling in bringing to the screen what must have been one of the most difficult adaptions in recent memory.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 12-28-2001 11:46 AM
Lord of the RingsBoring I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly why. I can't remember a scene that wasn't well done and lavish. Great scenery great cgi. I didn't care much for frough dough. I guess he's suppose to be a wuss. Does he ever get any back bone later on? There's too many scenes of his big blue eyes being afraid and him wimpering about wanting to be left alone. It was also way too long and judging from the rest of the audience, they thought so too. Maybe the sequels will explain why you have to sit through the acres of repetitive stuff in this film. I guess what this film reminds me of the most is a combat type video game. It seems to have no point other than to go from one conflict with one type of underworld bad guy to the next. They should have a point meter in the corner of the screen. ------------------ Greg Mueller Amateur Astronomer, Machinist, Filmnut http://www.muellersatomics.com/
| IP: Logged
|
|
Joe Beres
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 606
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 12-28-2001 03:08 PM
Adam, i have to agree with you, I have enjoyed all of Peter Jackson's films. I can understand people not liking Bad Taste and Meet the Feebles (the most disturbing movie with puppets ever made), but you really can't beat the lawnmower scene in Dead Alive. (The finest gore film ever made in my opinion) Then Heavenly Creatures, one of my all time favorites, you must have a look at that one. The Frighteners, with Michael J Fox at his best, is one of the most underated films of the 90s. It's a fantastic old school sort of horror film, only with great special effects.As far as Lord of the Rings is concerned, I really liked it. I haven't read the books either, and I had no problem following the plot or characters. They really do pack a lot of high points into a three hour movie though. I don't think the film could have been made better, but it still has some inherent problems, most of which are miostly forgiveable. CGI still looks like CGI, and the shrinking of the actors playing Hobbits was hard to get used to; it was pretty abvious that the scenes that involved hobbits and full-size actors were digitally manipulated and that the close up shots were not, making for some somewhat jarring cuts. Overall though, it was quite good. I have to give credit to a three hour film with 20 minutes of trailers that started at 10:15 that held my attention and didn't have me looking at my watch.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 01-03-2002 09:50 AM
Attendance: 2002/01/02 19:45, Carmike 10, Huntsville, AL, Auditorium 6, Scope, Dolby Digital/THXI'm not sure why I waited so long to see this movie, but I'm glad I did. I got a showing that only had 30 to 40 people in it on a Wednesday night, in a 42 foot THX auditorium. I don't think I heard a single cell-phone or any distracting noises from anyone in there, which is extremely rare. First, I've never read the books, so I was a bit worried that I would sit through a three hour movie that I wouldn't fully understand or enjoy. This movie, to me, will probably be a bit like the Star Wars movies. I never cared for the Star Wars movies until around 1997, then I loved them. Some movies take more than one viewing to fully understand and appreciate, and the Lord Of the Rings movies will probably be that way for me. There were lots of long-haired guys in the movie, and one or two of them could easily do drag and make great chicks. There was one in one scene that I had to study to figure out if it was male or female. The sound was phenomenal. The clarity of the sound and the directional sound effects were excellent. My heart sank a bit when the scope changeover occurred during the previews. After the changeover, the aperture plate was not in the proper position, causing the image to be about a foot and a half to the left, with the soundtrack visible a foot beyond the left screen edge and with the same amount of image blocked out on the right. I went out at the end of one of the previews, telling the audience I was going to get them to fix it, which they quickly did. I did not want to watch a 3 hour movie that way. What bothers me even more is that this happened the last time I saw a scope movie in auditorium 6 on August 24, 2001, and I'd hate to think that every scope movie has been shown that way since then.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 03-14-2002 07:00 PM
3/14/2002, Cinemark 17, Springfield OR, #3, DTS. Excellent presentation, sharp, bright, steady, very good sound. About 25 people there. Print still looks like brand new (the theater GM says this print is 1 of the original 3 they received on the movie's opening day). Super-35 image is quite grainy sometimes.Saw it again today, with a group who all wanted to see it once more before it leaves theaters (they are all game developers: graphic artists and programmers, and they are in awe of this movie). My 3rd time. Still holds up very well for me. I hope this wins some awards. And that's all I have to say about that.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 08-06-2002 06:27 PM
Well, the DVD of LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring arrived in stores today. Lotsa people snapping up losta copies. If the way this DVD is moving off shelves here in Lawton is any indication, I expect this 2-disc set to displace others like "Shrek," "The Matrix," "Gladiator" and "Harry Potter" as the biggest selling DVD to date.I'm surprised New Line managed to fit the entire theatrical cut of the flick onto a single disc. Of course, the 178 minute running time negated any other extras on Disc One, such as a commentary track. Video quality on the anamorphic widescreen version is pretty decent given all the challenging visual material. Still, some details get pretty soft at times. I'll bet the 4-disc Collector's Edition (which will spread the 30-minute longer cut across 2 discs) will have noticeably sharper image detail and better refinement of motion. Audio on the disc (DD-EX 5.1) is excellent. I don't think I have any other DVDs in my collection featuring DD tracks with as powerful a bass response as this. It kind of makes me wonder just how much more over-the-top the sound will be on the 4-disc edition and its DTS-ES 6.1 Discrete audio track. New Line has said that many of the extras used on the 2-disc edition will not be carried over to the 4-disc version. I guess they want you to spend a lot of cash for both. The 2-disc edition contains a $5 mail-in rebate off the 4-disc set. If you liked the movie okay and want some new home theater demo material, then pick up the 2-disc set. Bigger fanatics of the movie will wait for the 4-disc version or perhaps buy both sets. The 4-disc verison will retail for $40, but sites like Amazon are offering pre-order discounted prices of $25. At least New Line isn't bending people over big time like Universal is doing with their $70 price to get the E.T. DVD theatrical cut.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Josh Jones
Redhat
Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 08-16-2002 11:21 AM
I saw this movie for the first time. Well worth the dollar fifty . I arrived just after work, and sat in an empty hous for an hour. 16 people showed up, and this same print has been running here for 7 months now! I really hate bitching, but it has to be said. The print was scratched from begining to end, at any give time there were atleast 6 thick black scrathces on screen. Ocasionally one would catch a dirty emulsion scratch. Focus was soft, even after I asked them to fix it. uneven focus and a flickering lamp. the print was so scratched, I'm surprised it tracked in dolby at all, but I never heard it drop out.enough bitching for one day, now for the movie itself.... I liked it, but it gave me the creeps on the way home  Josh
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|