Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » 28 Days Later (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: 28 Days Later
Michael Brown
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1522
From: Bradford, England
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 07-17-2003 07:53 AM      Profile for Michael Brown   Email Michael Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
espically making some of the deserted landmark visuals more personal (like a deserted Time Square or something), but I am sure that there will be a number of American rip-offs and that Resident Evil 2 will borrow the 60 mph zombie concept.
Your missing the whole point. The film is set it in Britain, and the deserted landmarks are of Britain, so the film is personal to British people as intended.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 07-17-2003 06:01 PM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I love how it kept the onscreen zombie action to a minimum so when the zombies were actually on screen you were really interested.
This form of horror movie making was also used in the original Alien film. Ridley scott had the alien appearing in sequences from as little as 1/4 second to 2 seconds throughout the film. The alien appeared for no more than a minute total. Very effective. It allows the mind to concentrate on what ISN'T there, so when it pops on screen, BAM!!!

Dave

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-30-2003 08:50 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Liked it. Possibly overrated (I know someone who saw it at a press screening before its release and was raving about it for a week afterward), but still quite good. I would have preferred that it had been shot on film, but (unlike most "digital" features), the production values are high and the sets don't exactly demand detailed images.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.