Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Solaris (2002) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Solaris (2002)
Mark Ogden
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 943
From: Little Falls, N.J.
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-29-2003 04:19 PM      Profile for Mark Ogden   Email Mark Ogden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
>>Was Clooney dead in the end?

Well, he was, and he wasn't.

It's not very well brought out during the course of the film, but the planet Solaris, which they were orbiting around, was itself a living, thinking entity (the whole planet, that is). And it was causing these physical manifestations of people's deceased loved ones (Clooney's wife, the little boy) to appear on the space station just to dick with their minds. At the end of the film, Clooney goes down with the station and burns up in the atmosphere of Solaris, only to have the planet reincarnate him and his wife on the surface, to presumably live together happily ever after.

I've never felt more like the Lone Ranger when posting something here, but I thought this film was magnificent, probably the best picture I saw last year. I don't care that it got all Fs in the preview polls, I can't wait for the DVD.

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-10-2003 11:41 PM      Profile for Greg Mueller   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Mueller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just watched this film for the second time. I found it intriguing and haunting. I though Clooney did a "much better than I thought he could" job of acting. I thought the music was great too. Guess I'm just not mainstream. The more I see this the more I like it. Another one of my favorite films suffered the same reviews. "Not enough action not enough explosions not enough ray guns." Blade Runner is one of my favorites just the same. Guess I'm down the road less traveled. I like it
PS The title and credits are at the end

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Cope
Master Film Handler

Posts: 256
From: Overland Park, KS, United States
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-13-2003 08:00 AM      Profile for Mitchell Cope   Email Mitchell Cope   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm surprised I didn't post a review on this film. I actually liked it. My wife hated it. I would have liked less of Clooney's rear end, though. I'm not a sci-fi fan other than things like "Blade Runner" or "The Matrix" franchise. I thought this was very well done, and spooky. I expect I will watch it again now that it's out on DVD.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.