Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Catch Me If You Can (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Catch Me If You Can
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-05-2003 11:01 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know why Spielberg insists on giving his images a blurry/cloudy look, but that part wasn't Cinemark's fault. The film was shot like that.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean McKinnon
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1712
From: Peabody Massachusetts
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 01-06-2003 01:34 AM      Profile for Sean McKinnon   Author's Homepage   Email Sean McKinnon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked this movie, I cant believe someone could get away with all of that.

I do feel however that is sends the wrong message... Steal 4 million dollars and not only get away with it but get a good job out of the deal!

Tom Hanks' accent really annoyed me though, you dont "farge" checks you "forge" them.

Knock... Knock...

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-06-2003 10:49 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David Stambaugh wrote: "The rolling stock was filthy".

Unfortunately, "Rolling Stock" ads are usually NOT printed on KODAK VISION Color Print Film. [Frown] If the film does not have a conductive anti-static layer like Kodak film, static charge can attract and hold dirt particles. Kodak VISION Color Print Film has also made significant improvements to protect against projector abrasion and the dirt it generates: [Cool]

Technical Data

Kodak VISION Color Print Film Introduction

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 01-06-2003 11:06 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some of the scenes in the movie did have a deliberate diffused-light look to them. The issue I'm whining about is the entire movie seemed to lack contrast and crispness, maybe due to being under-lit. That's just a guess though.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-06-2003 02:31 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Not to be picky John, but rolling stock is always the first thing on the roll. Kodak stock or not, it will look terrible at most theaters. (In other words, that's cheating.) [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-06-2003 03:52 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just look at the difference when Kodak VISION Color Print film is used for the "rolling stock" ads and trailers, and you'll see the difference. Projector abrasion and static charge issues about rolling stock ads on other films have already been discussed on Film-Tech.

 |  IP: Logged

William Leland III
Master Film Handler

Posts: 336
From: Charleston, SC,
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-07-2003 03:46 PM      Profile for William Leland III   Author's Homepage   Email William Leland III   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I enjoyed "Catch Me If You Can". The movie was told very well and I liked John Williams' musical score. I think he blended the movie theme ( a thief ) well into music. I was a little hesitant to see another wonderful job by Mr. Big Tom Hanks. But he did a good job and didn't steal away from Leo.

Unlike David Stambaugh's movie my film was out of frame until the last 3 reels. I could see boom mikes in scenes and some shots you could not see the actors. I did notice bad lad splices and sound popping in and out.

It was funny to notice that the audience didn't complain about the framing, until the last few reels. The reason I didn't complain was because I movie hopped. I know bad on me but I worked for the company for 1 year and 8 months (no raise pay) and I was head projectionist.

 |  IP: Logged

Ray Brown
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 111
From: Dayton, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 01-17-2003 05:49 PM      Profile for Ray Brown   Author's Homepage   Email Ray Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just got done previewing this movie. My two favorite scenes are when DiCaprio is fleeing the country and when his Mom offers to payback everything he stole. [Big Grin]

I give this movie [thumbsup] [thumbsup] .

 |  IP: Logged

Arthur Allen
Film Handler

Posts: 99
From: Renton, WA, USA
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 01-25-2003 12:06 AM      Profile for Arthur Allen   Author's Homepage   Email Arthur Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw this a few weeks ago at my first visit to Jack Ondracek's Redwood Cinema. It was strange not seeing ceiling tiles in the auditorium, but that must be part of the renovation. The sound was great and (considering the narrow room) could have passed for digital if not for the lab splice. The only serious complaint about the presentation was the preview for "Old School," which didn't seem to have much in common with this movie's audience. I heard one audience member say, "That's one movie I'm NOT going to see."

The only historical inaccuracy I can remember now is the modren pictoral Stop Ahead sign seen on the street as the FBI members drive to the hotel. Back in the 60's it would have been a sign that actually spelled out "STOP AHEAD."

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 02-03-2003 04:03 AM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
when Frank was first trying on the pilot uniform, he told the uniform salesman that he was a "co-pilot," yet the jacket only had two gold stripes on the sleeve, which would indicate "flight engineer" and not "copilot/first officer."
I think in some later scenes he is wearing a jacket with three stripes but I am not sure. I also wondered if they had photocopy machines in that time.
I liked the movie very much.

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 02-03-2003 05:11 AM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Haloid Xerox Inc. introduced the first automatic, plain-paper office copier, called the Xerox 914 in 1959.

The first xerographic copier, the Model A, was introduced in 1949 by the Haloid Company.

Oddly, the Haloid Company was founded in 1906, the same year Chester Carlson (the inventor of xerography) was born (on February 8th).

As for the movie... I liked it. Sure it may have had some historical flaws, but what movie depicting the past hasn't? Heck, most movies don't even portray the present correctly. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Ray Brown
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 111
From: Dayton, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 02-03-2003 07:40 PM      Profile for Ray Brown   Author's Homepage   Email Ray Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The only serious complaint about the presentation was the preview for "Old School," which didn't seem to have much in common with this movie's audience. I heard one audience member say, "That's one movie I'm NOT going to see."
The "Old School" trailer was attached to the head of Catch Me If You Can.

All I can say about the trailer is "That's one movie I don't think we will be booking."

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-07-2003 11:51 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Saw Tom Hanks on a rerun of Letterman the other nite. He stated that Abagnale had pulled the stunt of putting a sign on a night depository stating "Night Depository out of order - Leave deposits with security officer." Then Frank stood next to the machine in a security officer uniform, and managed to nab about $4000 that way. Hanks said it was his favorite Abagnale story and regretted it didn't make the movie.

Good film but I had a hard time believing the airliner part at the end (don't want to spoil it for the few who haven't seen it yet).

 |  IP: Logged

David Favel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 764
From: Ashburton, New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 02-08-2003 01:59 AM      Profile for David Favel   Email David Favel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The book is a very good read.
One of the best things he did was to insert his account number onto blank deposit forms at the bank when he observed that most people leave it for the tellers to fill in. That day he made over $40000.00

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 02-08-2003 05:15 AM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How could he go on getting free flights as a pilot? There can not have been too many PanAm pilots (maybe a few hundred) couldn`t they have published a list with names and pictures to refer to? I also didn`t quite believe the end, I think it was just a final gag to round things off.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.