Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Holes (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Holes
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-09-2003 10:18 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good film...definitely recommended. Although I don't normally bother to watch anything that's marketed as a "family film," I'm glad I saw this. It's fun for the kids and adults, and (unlike way too many "kids' movies") it doesn't underestimate the intelligence of its audience. This is a refreshing break from a long line of crappy "family" films released over the last year or so (cough...Country Bears...Kangaroo Jack...cough).

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-10-2003 02:40 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
You know I was looking at a part of this film tonight and I think I would enjoy it even more on a second viewing. I guess I was involved in the story a bit, but tonight I noticed just how good of a job the D.P. did on this film. The image really jumps out at you with fantastic contrast and sharpness, especially when you are looking at it on a screen that is way over SMPTE luminance specs. [Cool]

Rarely do I watch a movie twice that didn't blow me away the first time, but I think I'm going to give this one a second viewing.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-12-2003 02:37 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The image really jumps out at you with fantastic contrast and sharpness, especially when you are looking at it on a screen that is way over SMPTE luminance specs.
I agree that "Brighter is Better", but going above the range of 12 to 22 footlamberts specified in SMPTE 196M may risk flicker (unless a three-blade shutter is used), and may show too MUCH detail in the shadow areas:

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/newsletters/pytlak/spring98.shtml

I've projected normal prints made from well-exposed negatives at 60 footlamberts (using a three-blade shutter), and the results are amazing! [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.