|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Freddy vs. Jason
|
Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 08-19-2003 03:50 PM
Yeah, that's the ENTIRE point behind Freddy movies, that he kills in DREAMS, so it is really hard to not have any dream sequences. This movie just isn't for you, nor any freddy movie.
As for Texas Chainsaw Massacre, I find it very difficult to believe that anyone can topple the Tobe Hooper classic, especially with Marcus Nispel as the helmer, whose credits only include a few music videos for the likes of Faith No More and Janet Jackson, writer Scott Kosar who has only assisted with editing on a few movies, and Producer Micheal Bay, who we all know and love!!!
So who knows, Tobe Hooper once was a nobody, but he had talent.
Dave
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Paul Rich
Film Handler
Posts: 56
From: Murfreesboro, TN, 37128
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 08-20-2003 04:48 PM
Actually, you got the plot wrong.
As is stated clearly at the beginning of the film by the gloved one himself (Freddy, not Michael):
*******************SPOILERS****************************
The adults of Springwood have spent the past few years erasing all mentions of Freddy and the crimes related to him. They have taken any kids who do know about him or have had some sort of experiences with him and placed them in a mental hospital and have them on Hypnocil which is a dream-suppressing drug (as seen in A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 3). [One thing the adults didn't change was the TV station call letters - KRGR (or something like that) ]
Because none of the teenagers, and even some of the adults, know anything about Freddy, he is essentially powerless. (The reason he could have power in the first film without the kids knowing about him was he had just recently (I'd guess 5 years) been killed by the parents)
So, Freddy needs someone to cause the kids to know about him. He knows that when Jason starts killing, the adults will automatically blame Freddy and the word will spread to the teenagers.
Unfortunately for Freddy, he can't control him as well as he thought he could (by taking on the persona of Jason's mother).
****************END SPOILERS***********************************
One question I do have is why doesn't Freddy kill preteen kids in their dreams? I suppose it's because these films are made in the U.S. This film came the closest to having that happen.
-Paul
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 08-30-2003 10:32 PM
Well, I have skipped all FRIDAY 13th films since Jason Takes Manhattan (yeah, only for the last 5 minutes or so! Ripoff!) and dont think I have seen a NIGHTMARE film after that 3-D travesty (I STILL remember the Roseanne Barr cameo, though). But, what the hell, I went anyway. Well, things haven't improved from my point of view. I DID like NIGHTMARE films I, III, and V. I don't think I liked any of the 13th movies. They played like pornography to me. Instead of sex, they substituted violence.
As to this movie, it was fairly well shot for this type of movie, but it definitely needed a sense of humor.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|