|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Passion of the Christ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 04-04-2004 12:02 PM
Not being a Christian, I suppose I have somewhat different take on the film. Yes, it is powerful, a powerful indictment of the abuse of the mentally ill 2000 years ago. Poor Jesus, a seriously unbalanced and delusional young man who was hearing voices and seeing imaginary visions runs afoul of the Italian (ok, Roman) occupation authorities in ancient Judea. In his sick paranoid state, he envisions that the Jewish religious leadership is out to get him, as if he and his cult was important enough at that time for them to take more than just a passing notice. Cruelly tortured by his Roman jailers, he is lead away to be nailed to a cross, where he dies in agony and abandonment.
Why don't people just look at movies in historical context?
That is the problem. The film does not work in an historical context. For Example:
- Contrary to what is specifically stated (subtitled) in the film, the priests of the temple did not need outside permission to put heretics to death, and they regularly did so when the need arose. The only time local authorities within the Roman empire need permission was when the person in question was a citizen of Rome, clearly not the case here.
- In both Jewish and Roman historical records, Pontius Pilate (sp?) was a cruel and ruthless military overlord, not the troubled and weak person portrayed in the film.
- While Barabas was a murder and a thief, he was also the leader of an armed rebellion against the Roman occupation and a very charismac figure. He had a huge following at the time, and his followers far outnumbered Jesus's when it came time to pardon prisoners. The decision to make the crowds pick the prisoner to be pardoned was not done in an attempt by the Roman's to wash their hands of the situation as portrayed in the film, but an annual event that had been going on for many years.
- There were no earthquakes in Jerusalem or damage to the temple around the time that Jesus died. The Romans kept very good records. In fact, the temple was not destroyed until many centuries later as a result of an Arab invasion that also resulted in the expulsion of the Jewish people from their homeland.
As to whether the film is anti-Semitic or not, isolated by itself, I do not believe it is. However, as a continuation of an ongoing propaganda campaign it certainly is. The "passion play" upon which the film is based was used for centuries to stir up hatred against Jews. In addition, one of the things that the Nazi propaganda experts found very successful was the casting of Jewish looking people as villains in mass entertainment films, sometime clearly identifying them as Jewish, but generally not. The Nazi's goal was to subtly plant the idea that Jews were different, did not share common values, and evil. This program worked all two well.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mitchell Cope
Master Film Handler

Posts: 256
From: Overland Park, KS, United States
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 04-04-2004 06:56 PM
What the Bible says is, "Then, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth quaked, and the rocks were split, and the graves, were opened: and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.." (Matthew 27:51-53).
The veil was a heavy curtain that blocked the entrance to the Holy of Holies in the Jerusalem Temple, the place where the Ark of the Covenant was kept, symbolizing the sacred presence of God. Josephus described the veil as an ornately decorated curtain, made of blue woven fabric.
"So when the centurion and those with him, who were guarding Jesus, saw the earthquake and the things that had happened, they feared greatly, saying, 'Truly this was the Son of God!'" (Matthew 27:54)
The history I know also says the temple was destroyed in 70 AD by Roman General Titus, only about 40 years after Jesus walked the earth. I've been to Jersusalem and you can see the excavations of where the city was destroyed by fire way before other occupiers arrived.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 04-05-2004 10:23 AM
Let's not get too deep into religeous context here, lest the thread be shuteth downeth by the gods on high.
Needless to say we all have our feelings on this film, lets not try to insult or feel insulted by anyones particular take on the film.
I have expressed what it meant to me, as did Gracia, who has a different viewpoint and I thought she described it quite well. No need to try and point out any wrongness by anyone as it was her feeling on the movie, no one needed to feel attacked, that wouldn't be christ like now would it?
Yes I defended the comment on the mormon church and the italians in general, but did so in one case a very straightforward way and in the latter more of a cynical yet evil way. Just remember we are all friends here, let's keep it that way..
eh?
Ciao
Dave
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 04-06-2004 09:15 AM
It seems that the concerns of Jewish leaders were justified...
CBS News
quote:
(AP) Hanan Nsour, a veiled, 21-year-old Muslim in Jordan, came out of "The Passion of the Christ" in tears and pronounced her verdict: Mel Gibson's crucifixion epic "unmasked the Jews' lies and I hope that everybody, everywhere, turns against the Jews."
The Quran, though, says Jesus's crucifixion never happened.
Such are the contradictions that are welling up as the Arab world deals with "The Passion," even as the film draws large audiences in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and other Arab countries that have approved it for screening.
In the Arab world, openly voiced anti-Semitism — and by extension the warm reception for "The Passion" — is bound up in the Arab conflict with Israel. Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, after watching the film at his compound in the West Bank, was quoted by an aide as likening Jesus' suffering to the Palestinians'.
When the 1998 animated movie "Prince of Egypt" reached Cairo, censors banned it. One reason given: Islam reveres Moses as a prophet, and many Muslims recoil at seeing their prophets portrayed as flesh-and-blood characters.
Jesus is also a prophet to the Muslims, yet "The Passion" was OK'd by Egypt's censors with no changes. They have not explained why "The Passion" was allowed.
Governments and Islamic clerics are also sending mixed signals.
Kuwait bans any movies depicting any of the prophets recognized by Islam, but one of its top Shiite clerics, Ayatollah Mohammed Baqer al-Mehri, has urged an exception for "The Passion" because it "reveals crimes committed by Jews against Christ." The government has not yet made a decision on his call.
The dean of Kuwait University's Islamic Law College, Mohammed al-Tabtabai, has ordered Muslims to shun "The Passion" on the grounds that Jesus is a prophet.
In Jordan, a leader of the hard-line Islamic Action Front says Muslims should read the Quran or pray instead of watching movies, but he doesn't mind "The Passion" being screened in his country.
"The Jews are the most upset with the movie because it reveals their crimes against the prophets, the reformers and whoever contradicts their opinions," Hamza Mansoor said.
And in Egypt, the head of a department at Al-Azhar University that often advises the censors on these matters also is taking a hands-off approach.
"My understanding is that it is about the last 12 hours in the life of the Christ, which involve Christians and Jews. Muslims have nothing to do with that," said Sheik Abdel Zaher Mohammed Abdel-Razeq.
The Quran, Islam's holy book, is unequivocal in sura (chapter) 4, verse 157: "They said 'We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah' — but they killed him not, nor crucified him. But so it was made to appear to them. And those who differ therein are full of doubts with no knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not."
Muslims believe another man was crucified in Jesus's place.
Many in the West accuse director Gibson of reviving the Jews-killed-Christ claim that has stoked anti-Semitism through the ages.
"The Passion" is also being welcomed by the Middle East's Christian communities. Some Egyptian churches and Christian bookshops were selling pirated versions of "The Passion" for less than a dollar even before the film opened here.
In the United Arab Emirates, a Gulf News editorial extolled the film for being "so close to the human condition in its depiction of betrayal, greed, falsehood, forgiveness and love. As Pope John Paul II has put it, `It is as it was!"'
The Vatican denies the pope ever endorsed the movie with those words, and kept out of the controversy. But Cardinal Nasrallah Sfeir, head of the Maronite church in Lebanon, waded right in.
"It is not exaggerated and portrays reality as it is. It is a very sad film and we did not feel there was any anti-Semitism there," Sfeir told reporters after watching the film at a private screening.
Part of the film is spoken in Aramaic, an ancient language still spoken by a small minority in Syria.
Salim Abraham, 37, a Christian journalist who speaks fluent Aramaic, said: "I was so very happy to see my language, for the first time ever, being spoken on the big screen and in such a powerful movie."
"I think there is nothing anti-Semitic in it," Abraham added. "It gives the facts as they are, though they may be slightly exaggerated in some instances."
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|