|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Troy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-20-2004 02:54 AM
quote: Michael Schaffer I guess they do it that way so that it`s more like classic theater. How do people play stuff like Shakespeare in America? Do they try to euroize their native accent to make it sound more "like Shakespeare"?
All over the map. A lot depends on the concept of the entire production, whether "traditional", traditional with no accents, re-cast in another time & place, whatever. Fake weird pastiche English-y accents, sometimes with archaic pronunciation components, sometimes attemptedly consistent English accents, sometimes re-set in a different time & place not the place of the production (like a New England production of Romeo & Juliet in the antebellum south with weird pseudo-southern US-esque accents), sometimes just trying to sound like reglar people tawkin in Hoboken or New Orleans.
(The famous "mid-Atlantic" accent which you still sometimes hear onstage & immortalized by early talkie actors like William Powell who came originally from stage work & education was a construction that was not just passed in trade but actually later taught in schools which devolved from the problems which arrived in early theater in the US which mostly utilized English plays until the USA started pulling together enough works written by natives in the native vernacular.)
It's a tough row to hoe anyway, since the Shakespeare stuff is written in verse & perms utilize constructions around not just what the words mean but the way not the words sound, & originally pronunciations were way different from current London accents. A lot of things which used to rhyme don't anymore or have the same number of syllables no matter wherever they're said. It's all mostly an imposition of another accent on top of language that wants to do something else no matter where it's done. But easily I've heard US 'accent-free' versions working very well in areas that have softer vowel sounds than bangy Appalachian, Texas, or midwestern accents.
Like every job, the result usually depends on how good the guy is who you give it to ta fabricate to the design. I always thought Edmond O'Brien was did a really good job as Casca & was one of the best things in the '53 Julius Caesar movie - he decided to use no accent, found a way to solve the problems & screw it together, came off a lot better than many others lost in the frame & verse of a production that sort of flumps.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|