Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Collateral (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Collateral
Richard Greco
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1180
From: Plant City, FL
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 08-11-2004 08:11 AM      Profile for Richard Greco   Email Richard Greco   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The picture for this was awesome. I honestly was kinda bored in this. The action was good near the end, but the pace just wasn't there for me. It was good, but not that great. An easily forgotten movie.

2.5/5

 |  IP: Logged

Jennifer Pan
THE JEN!

Posts: 1219
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 08-14-2004 02:53 AM      Profile for Jennifer Pan   Author's Homepage   Email Jennifer Pan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Too long! Could have shorten it or added more action. At least a little [sex] for God sakes [Big Grin] j/k

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-15-2004 10:08 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not one of Michael Mann's best efforts but a solid effort indeed and I enjoyed the film alot. Cruse did a great job and was very slick. It kept me well occupied for the length and was somewhat of a nail biter for the last part. I didn't feel it was too long and much of the film has a slickness to it that others try for but never make. This is the first film that I have been able to become "involved in" in a long long time.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Tommie Evans
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 116
From: Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
Registered: Sep 2004


 - posted 09-12-2004 08:40 AM      Profile for Tommie Evans   Email Tommie Evans   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did anyone notice the stiffs in the mortuary move, or the cop look straight into the camera after putting down the phone... [Big Grin]

I really enjoyed this movie, a change from Tom Cruise playing the good guy. I was on the edge of my seat for most part!

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-12-2004 03:58 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I enjoyed it but I *did* wonder how they were able to shoot this film with such low light levels. Now I know: Video. This probably also explains the low contrast look.

Lots of style, good to see Tom Cruise in a 'bad guy' role.

Presentation at the (new) Edwards in Alhambra (Christie projector) was a hair out of focus and the final reel had positive vertical scratches throughout. SRD track sounded great.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-12-2004 07:33 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Manny Knowles
I enjoyed it but I *did* wonder how they were able to shoot this film with such low light levels. Now I know: Video. This probably also explains the low contrast look.
The CCDs in the HD video cameras used were probably a good bit larger than the 1/4" or 1/3" sized CCDs you typically find on most consumer and broadcast quality video cameras. Even more likely, the HD cameras had very expensive lens systems able to suck up as much ambient light as possible.

The low contrast look could either be the in-between film step in making the 35mm interpositives. However, there are electronic methods both within some video cameras and in post production systems that try to imitate film gamma.

Still, I think the producers ought to take a chance and leave the original video imagery looking like video when it is released to DVD.

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Cope
Master Film Handler

Posts: 256
From: Overland Park, KS, United States
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-14-2004 08:01 AM      Profile for Mitchell Cope   Email Mitchell Cope   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yawnnnn. I’ve seen better TV than this. I mean network TV. This seemed all too contrived. These characters looked like they were doing a play. Very uneven. There was a speck of suspense at the end, but that was about it. It was stupid to believe all this could occur.

I could have lived with the video, but the “smearing” had no redeeming qualities. It didn’t add to the realism, it took away that “suspension of disbelief”. LA at night was cool, but it needs to be redone with a different story and a different recording system.

DOA [thumbsdown]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.