Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Crash (2005) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Crash (2005)
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-31-2006 01:22 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Theater = $8 plus crappier sound and sometimes crappier picture than my TV.

DVD = $0 (my friend is manager of a Blockbuster) with much better sound and sometimes picture.

DVD wins every time.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 03-31-2006 01:30 PM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aren't these "afterlife" issues? [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Jennifer Pan
THE JEN!

Posts: 1219
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 03-31-2006 01:33 PM      Profile for Jennifer Pan   Author's Homepage   Email Jennifer Pan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
DVD wins every time.
Well, obviously not this time. [Big Grin] There are a lot times that yes a DVD would make a better movie going experience... But not always. And of course getting to watch it for free on DVD is great... that's where it helps to have someone in the same city with theater ticket hook ups. [Smile]

quote: Joe Redifer
So in conclusion: Good movie, crappy DVD.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-01-2006 03:57 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, this time. No commercials to sit through, better sound, and an untouched wallet.

 |  IP: Logged

Jennifer Pan
THE JEN!

Posts: 1219
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 04-01-2006 07:27 AM      Profile for Jennifer Pan   Author's Homepage   Email Jennifer Pan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, forbid you ever touch your wallet...

Anyways, back to the movie... I'm glad it won best picture, even if everyone else says differently. I was cheering for it all the way... they don't make movies like this often.

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Winn
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 131
From: Mesquite, TX, USA
Registered: Jan 2006


 - posted 04-03-2006 01:25 AM      Profile for Jason Winn   Email Jason Winn   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just saw this movie for the first time earlier tonight on Showtime. All I can say is "Damn! This movie is awesome!" From the moment this movie started until the credits rolled, it had me on the edge of my seat. It was like a 2 hour roller coaster ride. I loved every second of it. I actually cared about all the characters, which is rare in most movies nowadays. I even cared about the gang bangers! I think everyone should see this movie.

I wish I saw it in theatres. I'm sure it would've had a bigger impact on the big screen than it did on my piece of crap 19" Magnavox TV. [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-18-2006 03:30 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
 -

Ok, this is a near-Afterlife post, but Joe started it. Just a quick question: WTF does this MEAN? What are the two graphics supposed to be showing? The box on the left labled "Standard TV" is not 4:3. The box on the right labeled "16:9 Television" might be, but that's not 1.85:1 which they then say is what the original theatrical release was, which it wasn't. Is this how they are trying to expain the difference between letterbox and DVD anamorphic? Are they tring to say you are going to get anamorphic image that produces 1.85:1 with this DVD? If so, then what does the line mean that says "Formated from the original 1.85:1 version in which the film was shot." To me that implies that they somehow CHANGED what you are going to see on the DVD from the original format, like when they announce (as if it is something to be proud of) at the beginning of films on broadcast tv, "Edited for time and content and formatted to fit your tv screen." If this DVD is in the original theatrical aspect ratio (1.85:1 ISN'T the original theatrical version, 2.39:1 is....small error, what?), then you don't need to change or "format" anything. Unless you are a jackass and don't know what you are doing, which the producers of the DVD evidently are.

DVD producers SUCK. So do their ass-wipe menus.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 04-21-2006 02:44 PM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I watched it on shotime a few weeks ago. Was it good? Yes. Was it good enough to deserve best picture, no.

The best line in the movie is when the girl from Taxi just got mad at don cheadle for telling his mom that she was white. She then replies that she is aztec, mayan blah blah blah. Then don cheadle says "who got all those cultures together and taught them how to park on their lawn." It is funny because its true.

[ 04-21-2006, 04:38 PM: Message edited by: Chris Hipp ]

 |  IP: Logged

Eric Hooper
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 532
From: Fort Worth, TX, USA
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 04-21-2006 04:31 PM      Profile for Eric Hooper   Email Eric Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked this movie, but it wasn't "Best Picture". It only won that because Walk The Line wasn't nominated.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.