Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Bourne Ultimatum (2007) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Bourne Ultimatum (2007)
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-09-2007 11:02 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Paul Greengrass is just a shitty director. Everything he has done sucks and he simply tries to cover up his incompetence with the epileptic cam under the notion that it creates more tension. [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-09-2007 11:23 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Kurt Zupin
Paul Greengrass did the last two bourne films.
No, just "Supremacy" and the current one. Unless you meant, "the two most recent Bourne Films."

Doug Liman directed "The Bourne Identity."

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 08-09-2007 02:47 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Time for him to retire. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Kurt Zupin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 989
From: Maricopa, Arizona
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 08-09-2007 03:36 PM      Profile for Kurt Zupin   Email Kurt Zupin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
No, just "Supremacy" and the current one. Unless you meant, "the two most recent Bourne Films."

Doug Liman directed "The Bourne Identity."

Yeah Mike, that would be the last two films. Ultimatum and Supremacy

Ahh apple to oranges [beer]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-09-2007 07:26 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You guys go back and watch the forst installment... it's imagery flows far better than number two or three.

 |  IP: Logged

Kurt Zupin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 989
From: Maricopa, Arizona
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 08-10-2007 05:10 AM      Profile for Kurt Zupin   Email Kurt Zupin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree Mark, the first one is awsome. The 2nd had some great car chases and this one was just a good story.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-11-2007 11:32 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Saw this today in #3 at Regal 15 in Shelbyville where the presentation was very good except for the bottom 25% or so of the image is out of focus. The rest of the image is very sharp. Someone needs to fix it if possible because subtitles were very fuzzy.

I liked the movie a lot. Very intense without being too overly complicated. I agree there was just a little too much Shaky-Cam but waddaya gonna do.

After the movie's huge opening, you know they'll have to do #4 but I read somewhere that Matt Damon wants out. Well he should offer to keep going but only at his price. He has a lock on the role. Stick it to the man! [Razz] Just don't get TOO greedy or they might find someone even better than you like the Bond series did with Daniel Craig.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Heenan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1896
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 08-11-2007 11:41 PM      Profile for Mike Heenan   Email Mike Heenan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Saw this one today, I liked it. Didn't have any problems with the shaky cam, neither did my folks who were with me.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 08-12-2007 01:07 AM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked it, the hectic camera thing did not bother me too much except that you can't really see much of the fight scenes. It's just arms and legs all over the place, or rather all over the frame.

Paul Greengrass is just a shitty director. Everything he has done sucks and he simply tries to cover up his incompetence with the epileptic cam under the notion that it creates more tension.

Tell us how you really feel about Greengrass, Brad.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-12-2007 08:59 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael, can you remember who you are [uhoh] [Eek!] [Wink] ?????

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-12-2007 01:06 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think shaky-cam has anything to do with someone being a good director or not -- it's either: (1) The actors can't pull off a believeable action scene or (2) the action scene is choreographed so ridiculously that no humans could ever act it out.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-12-2007 01:29 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I strongly disagree. When a director ALWAYS uses the shaky cam, it is quite clear to me that he does not know how to properly direct an action scene. If you can't tell what's going on half of the time...it's shitty directing.

Paul Greengrass is stupid. (That was for David)

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-12-2007 06:48 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with Brad on this one. Its sad too that with the grosses this film is doing that we will obviously have to put up with more ineptness from the same director down the line.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 08-12-2007 11:15 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Michael, can you remember who you are?????
Funny, now that you mention it, I can only remember stuff 8 years back or so, before that, I remember bits and pieces, but no coherent stories. Hmmm...maybe those bits and pieces are residue of my earlier identity, or maybe they are part of the new identity I received back then? Who knows...

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-13-2007 04:18 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael Shaffer, your response of "tell us how you really feel" was well thought out and right on target! It was also extremely witty and added much to the thread. You sure put Brad in his place. How dare he get directly to the point with words that may frighten the timid! That deserved the appropriate comment which you thoughtfully provided. In all my years of reading text on the internet and listening to people converse in real life, I have never heard such an original response. Keep 'em comin' Mike!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.