Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » There Will Be Blood (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: There Will Be Blood
Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 02-12-2008 01:55 AM      Profile for Stu Jamieson   Email Stu Jamieson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I didn't. I only judged the work that I have seen. I don't call myself a fan of Day-Lewis because I have only seen 2 of his films. I thought I was quite clear about that. And just because I'm not a fan doesn't mean I hate the guy (I don't) because after all, as you quite rightly state, I haven't seen enough of his films to make that judgement. In short, the purpose of my post was to judge Day-Lewis' performance in Blood only and the purpose of my "aficionado" comment was merely to differentiate my point from the 2 posts immediately prior which were judging his career as a whole.

Not that any of this really matters; let's move on shall we?

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-13-2008 01:45 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bump.

This is another movie I put off seeing until I could rent it on Blu-ray disc. Like Cloverfield, this is another one I'm glad I only rented. That's disappointing because I liked Paul Thomas Anderson's three previous films (especially Magnolia and Boogie Nights).

There Will Be Blood is interesting in parts, but unfortunately not as an entire film. The production showed great attention to detail and maintained a very authentic feel to the time period and industry involved. The cinematography is very good. Not sure if it's really Oscar-worthy, but it's good. The music score sounded like an homage to parts of Close Encounters of the Third Kind. But all of this stuff is for nothing if the story takes 2.5 hours not going much of anywhere.

I think Daniel Day Lewis did a good job portraying the enigmatic Daniel Plainview character. However the character arc and story plot is pretty muddy. Certain events happen that make the story feel like it is going to gear up and finally get some momentum, but then nothing comes of it. Plainview threatens executives from Standard Oil. Isn't something supposed to happen as a result? He commits acts of fraud and violence against other people. Same thing. Little if any consequence. I felt the abrupt ending left a long movie seeming unfinished (despite the main character's parting line).

I'll give P.T. Anderson credit for taking the chance to not make a conventional Hollywood film. However, any filmmaker is still playing his movie to an audience. I'm sure lots of P.T. Anderson fans want him to get back to the style of film making he used on Boogie Nights and Magnolia. No artist wants to repeat himself either.

Many critics have lavished this movie with rave reviews. Some have even noted the film's similarities with Citizen Kane. But any similarities are superficial. Charles Foster Kane has a very clear character and story arc, going from a bawdy, fun loving young man with lots of friends to a destroyed and isolated egomaniac surrounded by mountains of material wealth. Daniel Plainview gets a mansion with its own bowling alley where he wallows in alcoholism and isolation near the film's end. But he just strikes the same paranoid, scheming note through the whole movie. If anything, it's only the characters around him that change.

The term "epic" has also been applied to this movie. There Will Be Blood was filmed in Panavision like so many "epic" movies, but it felt more like a smaller art house film to me.

The Blu-ray disc of There Will Be Blood doesn't contain many extras. It does have The Story of Petroleum, an interesting B&W silent film originally produced by Sinclair Oil. The 25 minute feature is educational in tone and some viewers may find it more enjoyable to watch than the main feature on the disc.

quote: Stu Jamieson
Starting with an unassuming title card and without fanfare, in an Old English typeface, white on black and silent like the films at the turn of the 19th century in which this story takes place, the title appears: "There Will Be Blood".
Technically, the font used is "Linotext" by LinotypeAG. It's been hit with some Photoshop filters to smudge it up a bit.

 |  IP: Logged

Andy Frodsham
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 238
From: Stoke on Trent, Staffs, UK
Registered: Nov 2006


 - posted 06-22-2008 10:39 AM      Profile for Andy Frodsham   Email Andy Frodsham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I must admit that I quite liked the film and Daniel Day Lewis's performance. I did get the feeling that he was doing an impersonation of the late John Huston at times (the latter's role in 'Chinatown' specifically)!

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-26-2008 04:15 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Seen when trying to purchase There Will Be Blood from Amazon:
"People who liked this movie also enjoyed anal warts, brain cancer, paralysis and scurvy."

Seriously, this movie is more pretentious than anything. But hey, it's Paul Thomas Anderson (who I was not aware directed this POS until the end credits started). PTA films are supposed to be pretentious. You're but a lowly commoner if you don't love his shitty films. I'll tell you something, he really needs to hire an editor. Clearly every single frame shot on the camera made it into the movie without exception. You will experience two or three birthdays during one viewing of this thing. Wait, it's Paul Thomas Anderson... he knows nothing of pacing. The music was clearly taken out of a horror film and was completely out of place here. Oh? It's "unique" you say? FUCK THAT! Just because something is unique or new doesn't mean it is good. The story was about... nothing. Nothing at all. When it ended, nothing was resolved, it was a story that was not worth telling, that nobody cares about. A story about a skunk fart would be more interesting.

The acting was ass for the most part. Once again the children performed better than Daniel Day Lewis. All he tried to do was a bad Sean Connery impression and lace everything with "intensity" which is the only thing he knows how to do. He sucks ass and does not deserve to act. I don't know what society did to deserve watching him in this movie. And since Danny DL won an Oscar for this nonsense, that means other actors will try to do the same type of overacting in their attempt to achieve the same. Thanks for indirectly cursing us with even more bad movies, asshole.

Please, let's get rid of these lame-o directors like Paul Thomas Anderson, Wes Anderson and all other Andersons who make pretentious movies.

Now I'm off to watch 10,000 BC, sure to be a winner! My hopes are high.

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 07-26-2008 02:28 PM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
He sucks ass and does not deserve to act.
As the story goes, we can all thank Scorsese and DiCaprio for wooing Lewis out of acting retirement, from his career as a cobbler, to make Gangs Of New York, which restarted his acting career.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 07-26-2008 06:17 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
I'll tell you something, he really needs to hire an editor.
His editor is Dylan Tichenor, who is easily one of the best in business. Personally, I don't have a problem with the editing, but if you do, PTA is more likely to blame. Prior to the film's release, an interviewer commented that there is nothing in the film which doesn't need to be there. PTA laughed, and said, "I'll have to tell my editor you said that."

As for the music coming from a horror movie, PTA has said from Day One that this film is a horror movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-27-2008 12:41 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow, Paul Thomas Anderson is an even bigger failure at life than I thought. Thanks for clearing that up. The only thing horrifying about this movie is how bad (and boring) it is. I'd hate to see him try an action flick.

But I bet you were scared, right Mike? [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Heenan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1896
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 07-27-2008 01:13 AM      Profile for Mike Heenan   Email Mike Heenan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just got this from netflix. My question is, will I end up fast forwarding through most of it, like I did with the yawn fests that were No Country for Old Men, and the Brad Pitt Jesse James flick with the untalented Affleck brother? (That assumes anyone actually thinks either of the Afflecks have talent)

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-27-2008 11:45 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Personally, I remember running My Left Foot, Last of the Mohicans and In the Name of the Father remembering how awful the performance was. (I never actually watched these movies, just out the port window here and there checking presentation and that was more than enough.)

Then I was forced to sit through Gangs of New York to check the print. Sorry Marty, but that movie sucked and Daniel's performance was just terrible. WAY overacted and laughably bad in parts.

Then was There Will Be Blood, which was awful right down to the stupid title. I flat out REFUSED to watch this, although I did sit through about 10 minutes of it during the print check screening, where the projectionist told me how awful his acting was and wanted me to witness it for myself.

I agree with Joe that PTA is a boring director, but moreso Daniel Day-Lewis needs to understand there is a big difference between stage acting and cinema acting.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 07-27-2008 12:31 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
But I bet you were scared, right Mike?
I didn't jump in my seat, and I didn't look under my bed before I went to sleep that night, but I do find it terrifying that people like Daniel Plainview and Eli Sunday exist. That's way more scary than supernatural nonsense like THE EXORCIST or something.

And for the record, I would love to see PTA do an action movie.

quote: Mike Heenan
My question is, will I end up fast forwarding through most of it, like I did with the yawn fests that were No Country for Old Men, and the Brad Pitt Jesse James flick with the untalented Affleck brother?
The pacing in THERE WILL BE BLOOD is slower than NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, but TWBB is much more compelling. Nothing can compare to the boredom of the Jesse James movie.

Also, has anyone else noticed how on BD/DVD, the chapter breaks are the same as the reel changes?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 07-29-2008 06:27 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
 -

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.