Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Speed Racer (2008) (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Speed Racer (2008)
Brian Michael Weidemann
Expert cat molester

Posts: 944
From: Costa Mesa, CA United States
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 05-13-2008 08:46 PM      Profile for Brian Michael Weidemann   Author's Homepage   Email Brian Michael Weidemann   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Forgive my lack of a winky smiley. [Wink]

In other news, Speed Racer business picked up a little today.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 05-18-2008 03:58 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CINEMA: Megaplex 17 at Jordan Commons, Sandy, UT
AUDITORIUM: Cricket IMAX
PRESENTATION: IMAX
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: None [Cool]
RATING: Four stars (out of four)

WARNING: "This isn't a race. It's a Spoiler!"

IN THE BATHROOOM: It's not your average hand blower...it's a Dyson Airblade. The guy who invented the vacuum that doesn't lose suction (and a whole bunch of other stuff you haven't heard of) is now marketing a thing you enter your hands into and pull out slowly as it blasts them with air.

It's completely awesome.

THE PLOT: A race car driver is invited to join a corporate team. Wackiness ensues.

Holy crap, the Wachowski brothers hit a home run. They absolutely nailed this.

It's colorful, the storytelling method is innovative (I did NOT find it hard to follow along at all...if they hadn't used it, the movie would have been four hours long), and while it may be too long for kids, everything in it should have been there. (And the kids who came out of this screening were all freaking out raving about it.)

Christina Ricci had better been allowed to keep her entire wardrobe. ESPECIALLY that red dress.

And it looked awesome in IMAX.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-18-2008 04:18 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Now I know why Sam is evil. He is trying to trick people into seeing this movie so they will suffer.

Sam, you evil man you.

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Mundell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 120
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 05-18-2008 04:34 PM      Profile for Tom Mundell   Author's Homepage   Email Tom Mundell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just saw it this afternoon, I loved it! I'd say 9/10. I agree with Sam's review, they pretty much nailed it. Didn't see it in Imax, but even in one of the smaller rooms at Tyson's Corner it looked and sounded great.

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis Benjamin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1445
From: Denton, MD
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-18-2008 05:04 PM      Profile for Dennis Benjamin   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Benjamin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked it.

The first reel was painful as the young man who plays Speed can't act (AT ALL). But once you get past that - it's a great flick.

Oh yeah, two of my three kids fell asleep about a half an hour before the end. So that extra half an hour (Hey-yeah cut out that first reel!) really is too much.

All in all - you find yourself cheering "Go Speed Racer" at the end of the film. So, yeah, it was good.

3 1/2 out of 5 stars (of Hope) [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Allen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 688
From: Evansville, IN, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-22-2008 01:31 AM      Profile for Brad Allen   Email Brad Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wachowski brothers should never be allowed to play with cameras ever again.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Allen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 688
From: Evansville, IN, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-22-2008 01:32 AM      Profile for Brad Allen   Email Brad Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wachowski brothers should never be allowed to play with cameras ever again. 0 out of 5

Edit: Oops, don't know how the double post happened.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Belloisy
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 120
From: morris, ct usa
Registered: Jun 2006


 - posted 05-25-2008 11:57 AM      Profile for Louis Belloisy   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Belloisy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Our film broker called a few days ago and asked us to hurry up and take "speed racer" apart, they were making a hurry up pick up. when i asked why, he answered, "the film is so bad, they are sending the prints to japan". they like this kind of movie over there. i wonder how they change the language

louis

 |  IP: Logged

James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 05-25-2008 10:45 PM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I has heard bad things about this movie, so I can't say I was disappointed. How can you be disappointed in something from which you expect nothing? The racing scenes were pretty, and the movie was tolerable up until the part where John Good man helicopters the ninja in the hotel room. I thought Al Gore did a good job playing the bad guy.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Lensenmayer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1605
From: Upper Arlington, OH
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-27-2008 12:14 PM      Profile for Mark Lensenmayer   Email Mark Lensenmayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Seen at AMC Easton AMC Imax (Theater 14) on Sunday, May 25 at 10:40 am. (Yes, we still go to the cheap shows!!)
quote:
"Let's Hear It For The Monkey" -- Gitarzan (Ray Stevens)
Actually, I thought the monkey was one of the BETTER parts of this movie!

This is one big mess. Hey, Brothers, want to make this movie a WHOLE lot better. Cut out that entire next-to-last race sequence...you know, the one where the good guys help win the race for the Asian guy. Just throw that away..junk it. Have Speed Racer get his Golden Ticket from a Wonka Bar and GET ON WITH IT!!

I have to agree with Evil Sam on one Point...it sure looked pretty on the mighty 50' Imax "Junior". Colors were bright and popped off the screen. Unfortunately, any time there was a fast horizontal move, the image couldn't keep up smoothly and there was a severe "jagged" effect...almost a double image.

What happened to the "Special Camera" the Brothers were using? In some interviews, actors in the film talked about a special camera the had guards around it to keep it secret. This camera kept everything front to back in the frame in perfect focus, much like a comic book. In a promotional trailer shown on TIVO, this effect is very obvious in some of the scenes. The effect was VERY VERY creepy. I didn't see any of this effect in the final version. Maybe they kept it just for the Japanese "Live Action Anime" version.

This movie is a giant, live-action comic book. I almost expected to see BOP, BANG, POW, like the old BATMAN show. Some of the dialog was just too silly. The film couldn't make up its mind whether it was for kids or adults. The children in the theatrer got VERY agitated in that slow section between the last two races.

Actors were almost not necessary here...they had to read their lines and stay out of the way of the effects.

Wife and I both gave this a C-. Not the worst we've ever seen, and certainly not the best. We were prepared for a "not so good" movie, and this picture perfectly delivered that!

This Imax MPX projector does not seem to have as steady an image as the GT model. When credits were shown on the GT unit they used to have at the local Marcus, the letters were absolutly rock solid, looking more like a slide than a moving image. On the MPX, there is a very distinct horizontal jitter.

My compliments to the AMC Easton Imax crew. I've been very critical of them before, especially about dirt level, and dirt sticking to the field flattener. This presentation was almost completely dirt-free. And they sure put out a bright, colorful image.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 05-30-2008 01:38 AM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just read Dave Halverson's review in GEEK MONTHLY. He gave the film a score of 99/100, saying, "What Blade Runner is to sci-fi (way ahead of its time), Speed Racer is to the family, action, and racing genres."

While I don't have nearly as much enthusiam for the movie as Halverson does, his review brings up some interesting points. I'd recommend checking it out. It's in the new issue with Wall-E on the cover.

 |  IP: Logged

Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 06-21-2008 07:20 PM      Profile for Stu Jamieson   Email Stu Jamieson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ooh, all the pretty colours! The colour saturation is so intense it's almost enough to make one's eyes bleed! There's no doubt about it, Speed Racer looks like a cartoon come to life, indeed everything about this film is as garish as its colour palette, from it's neon-bright CGI to Susan Sarandon's faux mega rack which is almost but not quite as convincing as that sported by Ms. Lara Croft.

The film runs solely on primitive emotions consisting of all the tawdry clichés such as love, hate, greed, jealousy etc and the histrionics are never allowed to mix - a strict quota of one emotion per character at any one time applies. Subtlety is not in this films vocabulary but this is a kids movie so it can be excused for keeping it's themes simple and its characters firmly black or white (or rather a gaudy red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo or violet as is more likely the case here.)

But as a kiddies movie it also frequently strays from the mark. Writer/directors, Andy and Larry Wachowski, spend far too much time mapping out the detail of a corporate subplot involving white collar crime and company takeovers, a narrative which is completely incongruous with its target audience. The film also periodically yawns with gratuitous sentimentality which will drive its young viewers towards more interesting endeavours such as searching for that lost lolly under their seat.

Speed Racer, however, comes alive with its high octane race sequences which will no doubt segue seamlessly with inevitable video game tie-ins. As spectacular as its CGI is, though, it's also very unrealistic. The cars look like bars of soap sliding around a bath tub. There's no sensation of friction; the vehicles don't even look like they're attempting to be real cars with tyres pulling traction on real roads. Although it's somewhat fitting that a cheap cartoon would spawn correspondingly cheap CGI, the albeit exhilarating race sequences consequently miss the opportunity to be truly awesome.

It's ultimately a vacuous experience, the dialogue is predominantly daft and its running time is about one race too long, but for all that there's still enough entertainment value in its spectacularly staged race sequences to maintain sufficient interest and to deem it unworthy of the "megaflop" mantle it has been burdened with.

6.5 out of 10

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 07-05-2008 09:50 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A turd in the cinematic punchbowl.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 07-12-2008 02:20 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Okay, here's the deal. If you never were a fan (or have never seen) the original series, this movie will seem out of kilter. It's because the characters, their personalities and mannerisms, were held true to the originals... which I could appreciate. I could hear the old show in their banter.

What I didn't like was the crowded settings -- particularly during the race scenes. The backgrounds were just too busy and intricate, and competed with the action for attention. With so much abstraction, the characters don't "read" properly and become lost in the background. It's distracting, frustrating, and annoying.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.