Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Sex and the City (2008) (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Sex and the City (2008)
Jaime Tuzzio
Film Handler

Posts: 50
From: Salem, OR, USA
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted 06-04-2008 05:11 AM      Profile for Jaime Tuzzio         Edit/Delete Post 
Oh, I really like that one.

Except, of course, that it would be lost revenue for the studios so it would never happen.

 |  IP: Logged

Shane Cooper
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 232
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 06-05-2008 02:53 AM      Profile for Shane Cooper   Email Shane Cooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the words of Stewie Griffith:

I am not interested in seeing a movie about three hookers and their mom!

 |  IP: Logged

John Koutsoumis
Master Film Handler

Posts: 261
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 06-07-2008 12:08 AM      Profile for John Koutsoumis   Email John Koutsoumis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For me this one blows but I have not heard so many patrons cheer, howl and clap all the way through a film.
The main thing is nearly everyone seems to like it and we are doing quite well with it. This one was my first interlock too.

Should have been filmed in VistaVision considering the subject. Would have looked amazing.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-10-2008 08:43 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: John Koutsoumis
Should have been filmed in VistaVision considering the subject.
?? They shouldn't have wasted ANY negative stock on this sleeze. They could have shot it with a video camera and all the sloshed female audiences would have had just as much male-bashing fun.

 |  IP: Logged

John Koutsoumis
Master Film Handler

Posts: 261
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 06-10-2008 05:00 PM      Profile for John Koutsoumis   Email John Koutsoumis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well at least they could look better on screen.
Apart from 1 or 2 exceptions I think most of the films originated in 65mm back in the day fare no better than this.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-10-2008 09:56 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This movie will have legs even if it doesn't have legs. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Jaime Tuzzio
Film Handler

Posts: 50
From: Salem, OR, USA
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted 06-12-2008 04:37 AM      Profile for Jaime Tuzzio         Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
and all the sloshed female audiences would have had just as much male-bashing fun.

Odd you would say that as Sex & the City actually "bashes" women more than it does men. Both the series and the movie.

Today it was men who were sloshed in our SATC shows. As time goes by, the male/female ratio for this one is leveling out.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-12-2008 04:48 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
This movie will have legs even if it doesn't have legs.
Fa-nar...fa-nar... [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Allen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 688
From: Evansville, IN, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-13-2008 10:18 PM      Profile for Brad Allen   Email Brad Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well done film.
3.5 out of 5.

 |  IP: Logged

Damien Taylor
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2007


 - posted 06-14-2008 10:49 PM      Profile for Damien Taylor   Email Damien Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, I thought it was pretty good, apart from the disgusting lab splice we were lucky enough to get.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 06-19-2008 10:42 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had a rash of trouble calls last week - every single one of them in houses playing this picture! [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.