Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Wall • E (2008) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Wall • E (2008)
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-27-2008 09:14 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Buy-N-Large website!

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 06-27-2008 10:54 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CINEMA: Cinemarkury 20 at Jordan Creek, West Des Moines, IA
AUDITORIUM: 9
PRESENTATION: Mystery Meat DLP
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: DLP screen door effect, slightly fuzzy picture, and yes...apparently you CAN make a DLP projector shake from time to time.
RATING: Two and one half stars (out of four)

Seriously...It's like when anybody in the booth walks by, the damn thing shakes.

THE PLOT: Robot lovin' for the sake of humanity. Wackiness ensues.

This is probably the most pedestrian movie Pixar has ever done. The storyline is pedestrian, the characters are largely pedestrian, and speaking of large...the mass of humanity makes the animation pedestrian, even taking away from the few moments of animation that impress.

It's seriously lacking in that Pixar cleverness.

I liked the short better, actually.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-28-2008 12:54 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Mike, they went out of their way to make that website just as useless and annoying as the majority of corporate websites of today with pointless Flash animation zipping all around as well as the generic photos of stock models everywhere that just screams "........." That's right, that's what it screams.

 |  IP: Logged

Shane Cooper
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 232
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 06-28-2008 01:05 AM      Profile for Shane Cooper   Email Shane Cooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow. The website is one of the most detailed marketing tie-ins I have ever seen. Also, spot on!

 |  IP: Logged

Kurt Zupin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 989
From: Maricopa, Arizona
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 06-28-2008 06:23 AM      Profile for Kurt Zupin   Email Kurt Zupin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm on the fence with this one as well. While I liked parts of it, i really thought the middle dragged on, reels 4 and half of 5 felt like an hour alone. I think this might be some of there best animation to date, but its not their best film to date. I liked the nod to Toy Story.

3.5/5 [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Mundell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 120
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 06-28-2008 04:28 PM      Profile for Tom Mundell   Author's Homepage   Email Tom Mundell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
saw this at AMC Tysons Corner 16 in cinema #11. I loved this! I give it 9/10; story was great, animation very impressive, great sound, all around solid. I didn't think it dragged at all, the pacing was pretty good. The short Presto is hilarious, though I think For the Birds and Lifted are still my favorite of Pixar's shorts.

 |  IP: Logged

Edwin Schwing
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 116
From: Las Vegas NV
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 06-28-2008 11:43 PM      Profile for Edwin Schwing   Email Edwin Schwing   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SO...

Did anyone notice the Pixar "eggs"?

I haven't found the ball with the STAR on it yet, and I am sure it is in WALL-E's truck somewhere... BUT I did notice EVE checking out the Pizza truck!

Anyone Else?

E

And what is up with the lighter? Are they trying to teach kids how to light Zippos????

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan M. Crist
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 531
From: Hershey, PA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 06-29-2008 01:03 AM      Profile for Jonathan M. Crist   Email Jonathan M. Crist   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does anybody else find it a bit ironic (or prehaps a bit hypocritical) when you consider WALL-E's two main themes: (i) we are too much of a disposable society creating too much useless trash and (ii) that having a dominant large corporation controlling your life (and keep you "entertained") is not good.

WALL-E is brought to you by the Disney entertainment conglomerate (you don't get much more controlling than Disney) and both Disney and Pixar have produced mounds of junk tied to their various films (including WALL-E) which have appeared in everything from Happy Meals to cereal boxes. (I still must have at least a half dozen of the wind-up toy "Cars" that came with the Rice Krispies a couple of years ago that I occassionally let loose for my cats to chase).

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis Atkinson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 129
From: Birch Run Michigan
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 06-29-2008 08:18 AM      Profile for Dennis Atkinson   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Atkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My 13 year old son thinks the movie was a shot at Walmart, AKA Wallyworld to some, including the blue uniforms, was it blue is the new red?
I think Pixar is putting more into this story than most people think. While not a great movie, the more I think about the BnL part of it, the better it seems.

Dennis

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 06-29-2008 03:42 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm convinced I'll never understand why people think Pixar movies are so good. They all have (fairly) interesting premises, but the stories are so straight-forward that the movies tend to be very tedious. For this reason, I think their shorts are usually way better than their features. LIFTED, in particular, was great.

But I think that WALL*E is their best feature to date. The story's as dumb as usual, but everything else was off the hook. The animation was amazing, and Ben Burtt's sound design was even better. I really wish Pixar would hire better writers.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 06-29-2008 04:39 PM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think everyone loves Pixar so much because many people, especially on this board, make up their mind about a movie before they even see the trailer. Kind of like people who hated Rocky Balboa because they say Stallone is too old, but then they defend Harrison Ford for doing Indy 4, even though he is older and not in anywhere near as good of shape as Stallone. I could only wish to look like him at 60, I'd settle for looking like that now.

Anyway, I liked it. I thought they did a very good job of humanizing WallE, unlike that horrible atrocity of a "movie" Cars. He also seemed very cat like.

But of course I still hate how these hollywood types are trying to brainwash the children today. Yes yes, corporations are evil and corporationy, I know.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 06-29-2008 10:01 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Suncoast Cinemark 16
Screen #10, Sunday 4:05pm matinee
$7.50 adult before-6pm price

Great technical mastery at the service of a half-baked story (where have we seen that before?). Guess the Hollywood weak-development-by-committee disease has spread north to Emeryville.

It was OK, but only that. Certainly not Pixar's best effort, other than the technical quality of the artwork itself, which was up to their usual high standard. The story arc and pacing slumped badly after the first couple of reels. Where was the editorial team? And the writing team? Plot holes, character motivation and development holes - this project definitely needed more time in the pre-production incubator.

What gets me is that with such long lead times as it takes to do an animation production these days, I'm amazed that no one recognizes and fixes such weak storytelling at the early layout and storyboarding stage. As it sits, this script should never have been green-lighted (green-lit?) to begin production. It's literally half-baked.

No one walked out, but there was a lot of looking at watches/cellphones/PDAs for time checks. Very quiet audience walkout. No buzz. The kids in the house weren't restless, though they were headed that way. This 1+37 film felt much longer than that. Not good. I expect better from Pixar and felt let down this time.

* * * * *

The second week of July I'm helping with a digital install in town, then it's off to Japan the week after to catch the opening of Miyazaki's latest animated film, Ponyo on the Cliff by the Sea. We'll see if the man that everyone at Pixar worships can match the magic he achieved back in 1988 with My Neighbor Totoro.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-30-2008 05:02 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was kind of surprised that the short at the beginning got past the Disney watchdogs (not to mention the rating board) what with the electrocution bit, the ladder to the crotch bit, and the fingers-in-the-eyes bit.

 |  IP: Logged

Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 06-30-2008 09:47 PM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've seen it three times now, and I still love it. I count two, possibly three 2001: A Space Odyssey references. What other films does it have references to that anyone has caught?

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-30-2008 11:00 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
 - ? [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.