Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » The Day The Earth Stood Still (2008) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: The Day The Earth Stood Still (2008)
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-17-2008 12:02 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have bought relatively few DVDs over the years. Probably no more than two dozen or so.

From memory: "Metropolis" - "THX-1138" - "Barbarella" - "Logan's Run" - "Silent Running" - "Soylent Green" - "Omega Man" - "Dr. Strangelove" - "Blade Runner" - "The Day the Earth Stood Still."

No,I don't have any "Star Wars"

There's a smattering of others like Hitchcock and Mel Brooks, etc. I can't remember any more for sure and I'm too damn lazy to go get them all out and list them. It doesn't matter anyway. You can tell what kind of movies I collect from this list.

Watching movies is WORK for me. Consequently, I don't collect junk. The movies I want to have in my collection are the ones that set standards for other movies that follow.

I really don't think I'm going to put forth the effort or the money to see any remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still."

If it gets rave reviews and wide acclaim, I MIGHT go see it.

Judging by what's been said above, I don't think I'll be missing anything.

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis Benjamin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1445
From: Denton, MD
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-18-2008 08:57 AM      Profile for Dennis Benjamin   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Benjamin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, I re-watched the original this morning. Great Film.
I guess I'm glad I got to meet Patricia Neal a few years back. I keep forgetting that she was hot back in the day.

I have decided that I will NEVER watch the new film that was just released. Sorry to boycott something having to do with my industry. But Hollywood has got to stop with this crap.

This is officially my "anti" review of the film. I refuse to watch it, which means it doesn't even deserve a rating and it is total crap. Thank you and have a nice day. [puke]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-18-2008 09:48 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Dennis Benjamin
I refuse to watch it, which means it doesn't even deserve a rating and it is total crap.
You sound like one of those fundamentalist preachers who condemns a film without seeing it. (Except a preacher probably would say "garbage" instead of "crap.") [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 12-18-2008 12:14 PM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I thought there were some good ideas in the new version and that it wasn't half bad, although the ending was very disappointing and left the audience hanging.

(But hey - who can complain about any film that stars the lovely Ms. Jennifer Connelly? [Smile] )

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Tommassello
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 547
From: Coatesville, PA, USA
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 12-18-2008 01:26 PM      Profile for Joe Tommassello   Email Joe Tommassello       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brian Guckian
who can complain about any film that stars the lovely Ms. Jennifer Connelly?
Is it just me or did Jennifer Connelly look...shall I say..."de-enhanced"?

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 12-18-2008 01:37 PM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yah it's that "DI look" [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis Benjamin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1445
From: Denton, MD
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-18-2008 03:20 PM      Profile for Dennis Benjamin   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Benjamin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey if the fundamentalist preachers can do it, so can I.

I am making an effort NOT to watch anymore movies that waste my time.

[Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-18-2008 07:42 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How can you make a remake of TDTESS and not have someone at some point speak the iconic line, "Gort, Klaatu berada nikto!"? For shame! And yah, I agree, Gort was the best thing in the film. His appearance was way impressive....he looked damn dangerous. And then they practically forgot he was there and went instead to those stupid metal cockeroaches for suspense and tension.

Transforming the wonderful Patricia Neal's character from a warm, vulnerable mom to some smartass, hot microbiologist made it much less believable, and what was that kid all about? That character was terribly constructed; yes, he missed his father, but that certainly didn't explain his obnoxious behavior which, after about the second reel, I was hoping he'd get caught in some of the gratuitous cross-fire. BTW, you would think someone in all of the entire breath and width of the US Armed Forces, SOMEONE would have had the brains to figure out that firing our wussy weapons at the aliens wasn't going to do a damn thing except really piss them off.

************SPOILER ***********
And the worst cliche of all was the idea that Klaatu, in the middle of the enihalation of the entire presumably worthless human species, would stop the roach feed-fest just because the bratty kid wimpered that he missed his dad. At least Cameron in THE ABYSS gave the aliens a fairly substantial reason to let us be, i.e., the selfless sacrifice for love of one human for another, willing to die to save another's life. But nothing more than a, "Boo-hoo....I miss my daddy?" Come on. What was Klaatu thinking? "Oh, yah kid, that makes ALL the difference....hang on -- hey metal roaches....cool it, the kid misses his dad." World saved. Puke.

1.5/5

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-18-2008 07:46 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Dennis Benjamin

I am making an effort NOT to watch anymore movies that waste my time.

Huh? You're going to stop watching new movies altogether???

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Lensenmayer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1605
From: Upper Arlington, OH
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 12-19-2008 07:45 AM      Profile for Mark Lensenmayer   Email Mark Lensenmayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
----- Possible Spoiler -----

Early in the film, after the ship lands and Gort is attacking, I thought I heard Klatuu say the "KLAATU BARADA" line to stop the robot, but very soft and muffled. Someone might be able to watch that scene and confirm or deny that.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 12-19-2008 11:40 AM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If the newest version had been released 50 years ago and the '50s version was the remake which would everybody be sentimental about and consider better?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-19-2008 12:28 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If that happened, people would be too busy griping about the cheap/cheesy special effects and poor quality color, etc. to notice the acting or the story.

 |  IP: Logged

Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 12-19-2008 02:50 PM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill, that is the difference between "classic" movies and "old" ones. Nobody gives a rat's ass if you remake an "old" movie. I am hard pressed to come up with a specific example, but I think that is only further demonstration of this principle.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Gorka
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 174
From: High Wycombe, England
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 12-19-2008 03:08 PM      Profile for Justin Gorka   Email Justin Gorka   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One has to remember that this film is actually base on the book (which name escapes me). Hence the globes and no spaceship. I also get the feeling that the editing was done to get the 12A(UK) audience rather than the 15 I believe it should have been. The real ending should have shown people suffering. Obviously not 12A material. (It's OK to see an Ork's head chopped off with blood spewing out but not a humans?).
Censor the sensors and sack the studio chiefs for not letting the directors do what they want!

 |  IP: Logged

Jon P. Inghram
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 124
From: Wichita, KS USA
Registered: Jan 2007


 - posted 12-21-2008 10:53 AM      Profile for Jon P. Inghram   Email Jon P. Inghram   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The short story the first movie was loosely based on, Farewell to the Master, has very little at all to do with the new movie, beyond have a character named Klatu.

[ 12-21-2008, 12:46 PM: Message edited by: Jon P. Inghram ]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.