Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Paul Blart: Mall Cop (2009) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Paul Blart: Mall Cop (2009)
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-08-2009 05:47 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We saw this at an Epic Cinemas theatre in some smallish town in Florida while on vacation. It had a few laughs but the story was stupid and it had one of my personal movie pet-peeves: A guy who starts out a complete idiot and is super-smart in his chosen profession within 2 hours.

Kevin James can now look forward to being paid $10 million or more to star in a string of similar movies (only with different uniform costumes) that will all flop, followed by a direct-to-video Blart sequel.

1 star out of 5, given for the few laughs mentioned above.

 |  IP: Logged

Damien Taylor
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2007


 - posted 02-08-2009 06:20 PM      Profile for Damien Taylor   Email Damien Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Chaplin kept all of his own film prints, which is why so many still exist I believe. I have a huge amount of those early comedies on S8, they never fail to deliver.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Heenan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1896
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 02-08-2009 09:49 PM      Profile for Mike Heenan   Email Mike Heenan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I rather enjoyed this... I dont think it'll hold up on repeat viewings though. I think they could have injected more humor into it, and did away with some of the excess "fat guy down on his luck and can't catch a break" plot lines.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-16-2009 01:28 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We're playing this right now. It's doing surprisingly well, in fact we were nearly sold out last night. But that doesn't make it a good movie! I'm sticking with my original 1-star rating.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-18-2009 11:30 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Uh, Bump?

Paul Blart: Mall Cop didn't work for me but hey, a lot of other people seem to like it.

Production budget: $26M
Box office gross to date: $139M

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Heenan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1896
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 03-19-2009 02:15 AM      Profile for Mike Heenan   Email Mike Heenan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Anyone notice how the new seth rogen movie looks exactly like Paul Blart? Weird...

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Elliott
Master Film Handler

Posts: 497
From: Port Orange, Fl USA
Registered: Oct 2006


 - posted 03-19-2009 02:23 AM      Profile for Joe Elliott   Email Joe Elliott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Someone probably went to both studios pitching the idea, and both studios turned him down, and then both proceeded to crank out their own versions of that idea. (Remember Deep Impact and Armaggedon?)

Has anyone else been seing a pick up in business on Mall Cop? 3 weeks after it came out we were shutting it down during the week more that we were playing it, and now it is beating some of our newer movies.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Gorka
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 174
From: High Wycombe, England
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 03-22-2009 06:40 AM      Profile for Justin Gorka   Email Justin Gorka   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I only lasted half an our in this one. It doesn't appear to be doing too well at box office either. I think the British prefer for cerebral humour. 0/5

 |  IP: Logged

Tony L. Hernandez
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 158
From: Windsor, CO, USA
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 04-16-2009 04:36 AM      Profile for Tony L. Hernandez   Email Tony L. Hernandez   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
went to see it at The Lincoln Theater in Cheyenne, Wyoming about 2 weeks ago, but mostly because I wanted to see the theater. The movie was "cute" and I did not get bored, but I must say the storyline was rather nondescript and the basic storyline has been used over, and over, and over throughout the 100+ year history of cinema. The only scene that was vaguely funny was when he was fighting with the fat old woman.

It was OK although I am sure I will have forgotten it within a year. The theater was quite full for the showing I attended though [uhoh]

 |  IP: Logged

Steven J Hart
Master Film Handler

Posts: 282
From: WALES, ND, USA
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 04-16-2009 10:18 PM      Profile for Steven J Hart   Author's Homepage   Email Steven J Hart   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I didn't care for the film much, but it was our second highest grosser so far for 2009. Marley and Me just edged it out for the highest gross. [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 04-18-2009 09:27 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Fairly stupid but has some moments, the audiences get lots of laughs, there will be sequels

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-02-2009 08:04 AM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm snagging a Paul Blart one-sheet. I just love that pose which says, "this guy takes his job very seriously."

ROFL! [rofl]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.