Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Iron Man 2 (2010) (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Iron Man 2 (2010)
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-08-2010 02:42 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I do not understand the lack of masking. I guess Cinemark customers aren't too picky.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 05-08-2010 10:18 AM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My thought on the masking was an immediate IMAX comparison...I've never seen an IMAX auditorium use masking either.

quote: Joe Elliott
edit: Well, more of a vibration and wobble.
'Vibration' is probably a better description for it.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 05-08-2010 03:39 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I heard some early reports that people didn't like this movie as much as the first or whatever. I just saw it in IMAX film, and I don't know what they're talking about at all. I thought it was right on par with the first one, which I thought was great. King of Prussia IMAX - good presentation overall, and it sounded awesome on the IMAX sound system. [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-17-2010 05:55 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's a good action movie but a little hard to follow at the beginning. I noticed that a lot of the dialogue had the characters talking over the top of each other a lot. Is this to encourage repeat viewing?

Overall I liked it. The sound was good, story was decent for a change. I can't really compare it to the first movie because I don't really remember much about it...typical for a summer popcorn flick, I guess.

I will give it three and a half stars, with a half star deducted for the disappointing scene at the end of the credits. (I never heard so many people say "we waited for THAT?!" as I have this past 10 days.)

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-17-2010 07:42 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
I noticed that a lot of the dialogue had the characters talking over the top of each other a lot. Is this to encourage repeat viewing?
It might have something to do about ripping off some of Steven Spielberg's style of film making. Just about every one of Spielberg's movies has at least one or more scenes with characters talking over each other in parallel at another character who is expected (and often does) absorb both conversations simultaneously. It's really kind of irritating.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 05-17-2010 10:25 PM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
(I never heard so many people say "we waited for THAT?!" as I have this past 10 days.)
Usually once I tell customers that the credits run for about ten minutes they ask me what the scene is and I tell them.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-18-2010 01:19 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This movie also has more of that most recent movie phenomenon, the computer screens you can see through, which would render them useless in real life. This show takes it to the next level though -- images that float in the air and can carried around and be crumpled up like paper.

Really, these moviemakers are like people who over-use "WordArt" to make their garage sale posters. Just because you can do something with software doesn't make it smart to do it.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Gallimore
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 108
From: Willis, Virginia, USA
Registered: Jul 2009


 - posted 05-21-2010 02:47 PM      Profile for Tony Gallimore   Email Tony Gallimore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did the (Burger King) King have a cameo in it? or could they afford him.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 05-21-2010 04:51 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, but Stan Lee played Larry King, which was awesome as hell.

 |  IP: Logged

Caleb Johnstone-Cowan
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 593
From: London, UK
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 05-22-2010 10:51 PM      Profile for Caleb Johnstone-Cowan   Email Caleb Johnstone-Cowan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Glad it wasn't just me who found it hard to follow the people talking over each other.

I enjoyed the film, and stuffed myself with popcorn soda and candy throughout. All the right boxes were ticked in acting, action and plot. Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell were great villains. Some people suggested to me that there were too many plotlines but I felt everything came together nicely. The first one seemed better, but only because I was surprised at how enjoyable it was. Looking forward to the third one..

Three and a half stars plus half a star extra for Scarlett Johansson because she is amazing in every way.

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Mundell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 120
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 05-26-2010 06:29 PM      Profile for Tom Mundell   Author's Homepage   Email Tom Mundell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
saw this at AMC Mazza Gallerie aud #1; THX/Dolby Digital.

I didn't think this was as good as the first one; still enjoyable luckily, but I had higher expectations. I'm thinking of going to see again before deciding whether or not I'll buy the blu-ray. Sound was definitely excellent!

 |  IP: Logged

Pravin Ratnam
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 844
From: Atlanta, GA,USA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 06-01-2010 08:36 PM      Profile for Pravin Ratnam   Email Pravin Ratnam   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Saw this at Regal Hollywood 24. Image was reasonably crisp and bright.(Maybe my standards are getting lower these days).

THe movie was fun to watch even if it is not a must see. But with summer's slim pickings, this would be a movie to check out.

Scarlett has never been hotter.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Weitzel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Vacaville, CA (1790 miles west of Rockwall)
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-03-2010 01:00 AM      Profile for Sean Weitzel   Email Sean Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just came back from this. Saw this at the Cupertino AMC at Vallco mall house #5. 35mm presentation. I presume it was SRD, I doubt anyone runs SDDS anymore. Print was practically flawless. Tack sharp all the way across, not a scratch or speck of dirt even at reel changes, and excellent sound. Only spotted one instance of CAP code either in reel 2 or 3. Enjoyed the movie. Gave it a B. I'd probably watch it one more time.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.