Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » RoboCop (2014) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: RoboCop (2014)
Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 03-19-2014 04:01 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
I have no idea. I never said they did. I said studios OFTEN spend that much. Sometimes more.
I highly doubt that a movie with a February release would get a $100 million marketing budget. There was nothing all that special about the marketing of RoboCop that would make anyone suggest it was close to $100 million.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 03-20-2014 10:35 AM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw the movie last night, as today is the last day it's showing in the area.

I really liked the original movie, and buying the original on Blu-ray got me $7.50 off the ticket to see the new one. I went in with low expectations, and I have to say that it was barely worth the $2.50 and my time.

It was enjoyable enough, so audiences unaware of what made the original what it was probably would not be unhappy, but aside from the commentary about talk shows leaning heavily on an agenda and corporations using them as a mouthpiece, there wasn't much of an edge to it. Yet another movie from the past that has been recycled, only without much of what made the original enjoyable.

One thing that struck me was how large Robocop's suit was in relationship to his head. There were times when he was walking, and his head looked shrunken.

This was also a one-man show. Whereas I recall the original featuring more of Murphy's partner Lewis, that dynamic was tossed aside as soon as Robocop is on the scene.

So, here we have another movie that looks nice, but doesn't have what it takes to make an impression on audiences. Even though the original is dated by comparison, this new version can join the ranks of the many remakes/reboots that suffer where it really matters.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 03-20-2014 01:36 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott Jentsch
One thing that struck me was how large Robocop's suit was in relationship to his head. There were times when he was walking, and his head looked shrunken.
What I didn't like was that RoboCop would walk around without his visor/mask down and it would only go down when he was threatened. The original got it right in that you only saw Murphy's face in the final 10 minutes.

quote: Scott Jentsch
This was also a one-man show. Whereas I recall the original featuring more of Murphy's partner Lewis, that dynamic was tossed aside as soon as Robocop is on the scene.
I don't understand what they were thinking having Lewis as man instead of a woman, then he is missing in action for part of the movie and then all of sudden he saves the day for RoboCop near the end.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 04-03-2014 12:06 AM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
on the whole I thought it was an interesting retelling of the Robocop story - but ultimately I thought the lack of a villain (i.e, 'Clarence') hurt the film. Gary Oldman was great, the film technically (image and audio) were great - the script: weak.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.