|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Godzilla (2014)
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 05-21-2014 08:37 AM
At the very least, the price tag on the Dolby CP850 needs to come down a bit or Dolby needs to come up with a CP950 that boosts capabilities yet cuts the cost in half -kind of like what Dolby did with Dolby Digital when the DA-20 package was released to replace the DA-10.
I'm not sure what can be done to make all those speakers and amplifiers more affordable. I think that's really the thing that pushes the costs up pretty high.
On the surface it would seem to make sense for companies like QSC to release 8 channel or 16 channel amplifiers, that way a Dolby Atmos setup wouldn't require 3 or more huge cabinets filled with amplifiers. OTOH, what are the drawbacks with having one piece of rack mount equipment doing the job of a bunch of separate power amplifiers?
By its nature Dolby Atmos does require more powerful surround speakers and works better with at least a couple sub bass cabinets in the surrounds. This is more added expense.
Installing and setting up an Atmos system looks pretty freaking complicated to me.
I'm not advocating garish, ping pong, extreme surround use in movie mixes, but I do think movie productions really need to schedule in the extra time needed to create proper, immersive movie sound mixes -whether they're mixing in Dolby Atmos, using whatever DTS comes up with on their "Open MDA" thing or if it's just something a vendor like ProTools comes up with on their own. If audiences can't tell the difference between a conventional 5.1 mix and an Atmos mix that isn't going to do much in the way of selling Atmos to commercial movie theaters.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003
|
posted 05-21-2014 09:22 AM
I saw Godzilla on Friday at the Marcus Renaissance Cinema in their newly-renovated UltraScreen DLX auditorium. The renovation brought large reclining chairs, reserved seating, and a Dolby Atmos installation. The movie was in Dolby Atmos, but Marcus was coy about advertising it universally, and there was no Atmos trailer preceding the movie.
I thought the movie was very good. I gave it a See Now! rating on our site, as it contained everything that one would expect from a monster movie. While I didn't dislike the 1998 version, this one was much more like the Godzilla movies I remember watching as a kid. There were definitely plot holes that were huge (how does an EOD soldier know how to do a HALO jump?), poor acting (Aaron Taylor-Johnson should not be a lead actor), and more, I was thoroughly entertained and cheered the ending fight scene.
The Atmos mix was good, but not spectacular. There were times when it stood out as off-screen voices came from a rear corner or Godzilla's roar was coming from just above the screen. I was most impressed with the sound system that was installed in the theater, as one of my main criticisms of Marcus' UltraScreens has been the lack of thunderous bass response. This movie contained quite a bit of bass, and this is the first time I've felt it in an UltraScreen.
Overall, I got my $10.50 worth.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 05-21-2014 03:02 PM
quote: Scott Jentsch The movie was in Dolby Atmos, but Marcus was coy about advertising it universally, and there was no Atmos trailer preceding the movie.
That's really a bad move on the part of Marcus Theaters. I wonder if they're trying to do like Cinemark and others, hiding the sound system brand name as perhaps a way of fooling customers into thinking the fancy sound system is exclusive to just that brand of premium priced movie theater. Given how conventional sounding some Atmos mixes tend to be, playing the Unfold or Amaze Dolby Atmos trailers would at least give viewers a better idea of just what that sound format can do.
Honestly, none of these premium priced big screen theaters has anything truly unique that can't be utilized by a competing theater chain. So all this value they're putting into their dopey acronym labels, like "XD", "RPX" or whatever is badly misplaced.
I'm more interested in knowing if the show is being presented in 2K, 4K or some other projection format. The differences in laser or conventional xenon-based projection might be worthy of note. I want to know if the show is in 5.1, 7.1, Auro or Atmos. Saying the show is playing in XD, RPX or whatever tells me absolutely none of that. It's just pretentious bullshit.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|