Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Godzilla (2014) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Godzilla (2014)
Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 05-21-2014 06:15 AM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
The pressure is definitely on Dolby to bring down the crazy cost of Atmos to make it more practical for a lot more movie theaters.
Agree 10000%. There is no way to really get ROI on Atmos at the current cost. People like me notice all the subtleties of the surround field and go out of their way to try and attend Atmos screenings. People like my wife just think it sounds good and don't know why. If it wasn't for me she wouldn't know what Atmos was and would think that a well equipped and eq'd 5.1 presentation sounded good as well.

It just isn't different enough to warrant a $30,000 price tag. Maybe Atmos theatres need to do what AMC seems to be doing in the "Prime" auditoriums and doing lighting to point out the speakers. Perhaps Dolby could work with them on some type of old school IMAX style "explanatory" trailer that lights the speakers and does demos with a voiceover.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-21-2014 08:37 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At the very least, the price tag on the Dolby CP850 needs to come down a bit or Dolby needs to come up with a CP950 that boosts capabilities yet cuts the cost in half -kind of like what Dolby did with Dolby Digital when the DA-20 package was released to replace the DA-10.

I'm not sure what can be done to make all those speakers and amplifiers more affordable. I think that's really the thing that pushes the costs up pretty high.

On the surface it would seem to make sense for companies like QSC to release 8 channel or 16 channel amplifiers, that way a Dolby Atmos setup wouldn't require 3 or more huge cabinets filled with amplifiers. OTOH, what are the drawbacks with having one piece of rack mount equipment doing the job of a bunch of separate power amplifiers?

By its nature Dolby Atmos does require more powerful surround speakers and works better with at least a couple sub bass cabinets in the surrounds. This is more added expense.

Installing and setting up an Atmos system looks pretty freaking complicated to me.

I'm not advocating garish, ping pong, extreme surround use in movie mixes, but I do think movie productions really need to schedule in the extra time needed to create proper, immersive movie sound mixes -whether they're mixing in Dolby Atmos, using whatever DTS comes up with on their "Open MDA" thing or if it's just something a vendor like ProTools comes up with on their own. If audiences can't tell the difference between a conventional 5.1 mix and an Atmos mix that isn't going to do much in the way of selling Atmos to commercial movie theaters.

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Floyd
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1079
From: Lebanon, Tennessee, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-21-2014 09:16 AM      Profile for Barry Floyd   Author's Homepage   Email Barry Floyd   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Too damn dark. Why do they always make the biggest actions scenes of a movie at night? At least when we ran 35mm some studios still struck drive-in prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 05-21-2014 09:22 AM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw Godzilla on Friday at the Marcus Renaissance Cinema in their newly-renovated UltraScreen DLX auditorium. The renovation brought large reclining chairs, reserved seating, and a Dolby Atmos installation. The movie was in Dolby Atmos, but Marcus was coy about advertising it universally, and there was no Atmos trailer preceding the movie.

I thought the movie was very good. I gave it a See Now! rating on our site, as it contained everything that one would expect from a monster movie. While I didn't dislike the 1998 version, this one was much more like the Godzilla movies I remember watching as a kid. There were definitely plot holes that were huge (how does an EOD soldier know how to do a HALO jump?), poor acting (Aaron Taylor-Johnson should not be a lead actor), and more, I was thoroughly entertained and cheered the ending fight scene.

The Atmos mix was good, but not spectacular. There were times when it stood out as off-screen voices came from a rear corner or Godzilla's roar was coming from just above the screen. I was most impressed with the sound system that was installed in the theater, as one of my main criticisms of Marcus' UltraScreens has been the lack of thunderous bass response. This movie contained quite a bit of bass, and this is the first time I've felt it in an UltraScreen.

Overall, I got my $10.50 worth.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-21-2014 03:02 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott Jentsch
The movie was in Dolby Atmos, but Marcus was coy about advertising it universally, and there was no Atmos trailer preceding the movie.
That's really a bad move on the part of Marcus Theaters. I wonder if they're trying to do like Cinemark and others, hiding the sound system brand name as perhaps a way of fooling customers into thinking the fancy sound system is exclusive to just that brand of premium priced movie theater. Given how conventional sounding some Atmos mixes tend to be, playing the Unfold or Amaze Dolby Atmos trailers would at least give viewers a better idea of just what that sound format can do.

Honestly, none of these premium priced big screen theaters has anything truly unique that can't be utilized by a competing theater chain. So all this value they're putting into their dopey acronym labels, like "XD", "RPX" or whatever is badly misplaced.

I'm more interested in knowing if the show is being presented in 2K, 4K or some other projection format. The differences in laser or conventional xenon-based projection might be worthy of note. I want to know if the show is in 5.1, 7.1, Auro or Atmos. Saying the show is playing in XD, RPX or whatever tells me absolutely none of that. It's just pretentious bullshit.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 05-21-2014 05:00 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I thought it was a mixed bag, definitely better than the prior US attempt, but ugh... the human characters were so bland and boring: Aaron Taylor-Johnson in particular. 3D was sporadically good, but it was too dark to really convey the dimensionality. The Atmos mix was pretty good, not great, but it did heighten some scenes).

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 05-21-2014 08:36 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jonathan, Godzilla is all about the lizard and who he fights with at the end. The human characters are just sideshows until we get to that point. The second installment can have whomever as actors, but it is Godzilla who matters. He is supposed to be our buddy.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 05-21-2014 08:58 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
well there was more Godzilla in the 1998 version than this - and what was all that extra weight / 'fatness' with him - he looked bloated ... [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-09-2014 05:15 PM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This Godzilla only looks fat beside that idiotic chameleon from the Ferris Beuller POS.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Monohan
Master Film Handler

Posts: 379
From: San Francisco CA USA
Registered: May 2014


 - posted 06-27-2014 12:17 PM      Profile for Terry Monohan   Email Terry Monohan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They will be doing a sequel, so here are my thoughts to the director. Have a seen like in a classic 35mm Chinatown movie theatre that is showing the old Godzilla film. Have the God Z monster break thru the back stage screen wall into the cinema while the audience has 3-D glasses on and he comes thru the screen into the frightened crowd. Have one old fat lady yell 'That is what I call good 3-D' Turn up all the surround speakers in the sequel with people yelling and screaming all around you. I'll send my thoughts to the producers.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.