Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Regal Responds about Carmike and State of Theater Industry (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Regal Responds about Carmike and State of Theater Industry
Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-22-2000 09:51 AM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The reason that Regal is getting an inventory is not for a sale. They are planning on filing for chapter 11 protection. They have to have a pretty good list of assets to show the court that they have the ability to pay debts down to avoid a liquidation. Carmike is currently shutting down nearly 40 percent of its operations and preparing to sell those parts off to make payments.

Carmike, UA, Regal, and a few others will all be filing by the end of this year. The studios are very worried as this could mean gross revenue adjustments by as high as 60 percent off of reported figures. And with the way this summer went, damn hollywood is in serious trouble.

Dave

 |  IP: Logged

Kevin Crawford
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 207
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-22-2000 03:15 PM      Profile for Kevin Crawford   Email Kevin Crawford   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Personally, I think that what is going on is a godsend for the business.

There have been too many crappy theatres built in the last few years by poorly run companies. Now the better run companies that pay for their film will get the product, and the true nature of darwinism will surface. Not only that but because no one has the cash, digital is that much farther away.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard C. Wolfe
Master Film Handler

Posts: 250
From: Northampton, PA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 08-22-2000 09:25 PM      Profile for Richard C. Wolfe   Author's Homepage   Email Richard C. Wolfe   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have been giving some thought to what the outcome of the theatre bankruptcy domino principal will be.

Normally if a major player bit the dust,or was even on the verge... the other major players would swoop down like vultures and pick the best that they could aquire as fast as they could.

However with all the major players in the same predicament, none are in a position to do that. Therefore one would think that the next logical scenario would be for the regional or smaller chains to come in and do the picking. But if all the major players default, and the lenders are stuck with astronomical loses the theatre industry will find inself in the same situation that it was in after television took hold. No bank or lending institution will want to have anything to do with theatres and there will be no money for anyone to buyout the bankrupt chains.

This will put the studios in a very precarious position....facing a major lose of income with so many screens unavailable. Either they will have to cut back the size of their release patterns...back to maybe 1000 to 1500 prints or.... buy the theatres themselves and go back into vertical distribution once again. With the justice department having looked the other way back in the late 80s and early 90s, when they got involved in theatre acquisitions once again on a horizontal plain, they might indeed be tempted to go at it vertically once again.

I have also thought about what effect this will have on the coming of digital projection. Always afraid that whatever happened, it would leave out the small independent who could not afford the change. I've often thought that if the little guy can't afford it...then how can the big guys (with thousands of screens) who are already in debt from building all those megaplexes afford it? The bankrupt situation of all the major players proved that they can't afford it either, and based on that I would predict that digital projection is now years away....ten years at least.

But again...if the studios would take over the theatres it could happen much more quickly as they are the ones to benefit from it anyhow.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew D'Vrey
Film Handler

Posts: 92
From: St. Paul, MN USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-23-2000 10:16 PM      Profile for Andrew D'Vrey   Email Andrew D'Vrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Evidentally Regal's new 20 screen complex in Brooklyn Center, MN was originally supposed to open in June or July. And it's STILL not open. I feel this one will adventually open, but they're also supposedly have land for a 16-screen scoped out in Minnetonka. The Minnetonka location no longer exists on their "Coming Soon" list--although the've redone that web page since I last checked.

Personally, my feelings are: Sorry, the Twin Cities is full. Pack up and go home, Regal and take your wish-we-were-even-close-to-being-as-busy-as-the-Mall-Of-America amateur-run 16 screen with you.

I'd like to see the Twin Cities remain with Mann, Muller, General Cinema (yay!) and our many wonderful independents. Maybe Kerasotas. Other than that, may your junk bonds bury you.

 |  IP: Logged

Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-24-2000 12:57 AM      Profile for Russ Kress   Author's Homepage   Email Russ Kress   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Let it be said that the majors failed all by themselves. Digital Cinema (as ugly as it is) did not bring them down.

They rose during a phase where they could show the venture capitalists a quick buck.

Now that reality is setting in, everybody sees that there is indeed a fixed ceiling on the entertainment dollars available in these markets.

We are left with the independants who knew better than to seek venture capital (READ: Give your company away), and the big boys who found themselves in possession of more money than brains.

A lot of these companies actually (and do) have decent, trained, professional people working for them. These folks don't have the luxury of the stock splits to fall back on.

Many a CEO saw his stock split numerous times. They will be okay in the long run.

Kinda makes ya long for the union days.

I think that the profitable theatres will be picked up by others, but some of these mega-plexes don't make sense.

I remember a story that I heard where a Regal-plex decided to get itself built in a "Sumner" town.

Darned if that Regal-plex didn't become the most expensive, luxurious sub-run ever!

Russ

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.