|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Showtimes for Pearl...
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 06-05-2001 02:46 PM
Bill Langfield said: "I don't see a problem with looping the leader around the projector. Morning projectionist can test/warm the projector,then lace/thread up."A potential problem would be that the leader is exposed to whatever dirt settles on the film overnight. Would be a real concern if clean-up crews were stirring up dust at night. (e.g., using blowers to clean auditoriums, which IMHO should be BANNED ) ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 06-06-2001 01:37 AM
Keeping the floor to "white room" cleanliness is far more difficult than simply threading up in the morning and keeping the leader off of the floor. How long does it take to thread the platter? 30 seconds if you are really slow??? How much extra time does it take to keep the leader off of the floor? Perhaps 10 extra seconds if you have to clamp the leader down to the projector somewhere before threading "top down"??? Surely no one is THAT pressed for time. If time is that short at a given theater, their presentation will probably be crap anyway, for there won't be time to check the loop sizes or to clean the projector head as necessary.I am not arguing that the floor should not be kept clean, but the math does not add up.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bill Langfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 280
From: Prospect, NSW, Australia
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 06-06-2001 07:13 AM
Ben Affleck, Josh Harnett, Kate Beckinsale, Cuba Gooding Jr, Alec BaldwinIt was the end of innocence, and the dawn of a nation's greatest glory. December 7, 1941 - A day that shall live in infamy Brad, I'm struggling here, as there are people here that know too much and I therefore will not pretend I can ever win a debate, though much can learnt in process. However my reason for night shift to loop the film past the projector is that they can do this one at a time as each show finishes, after all they are not going anywhere until the last show is over. I know no morning shift person who objects to this, anywhere. The film need never touch the floor, and as you suggest use a cloths peg to make sure of that. With the film looped through you can then use the time saved to check or replace house lighting, isle lighting, foyer lighting, check morning email, read the diary. Why do something in the morning that could have been prepared the night before. I dont believe that the dust that settles on a leader that has been looped through is signifficant. Currently the manager and projectionists arrive at 9am for a 10am first session, floor/candy/box staff arrive at 9.30am (though they always seem to show up early, this is good) and doors open at 9.45am. (This can change on weekends or holidays) It's not that one is pressed for time, it just creates more time to be able to lace up SLOWLY and ensure loops are the correct size and rollers have not been missed. It is not a race, I prefer people to start a show a few minutes late (no matter what time of day - and if sessions have been programmed too close together) than miss a roller and destroy a whole print (even though all projectors should be checked every 30 minutes) (Even if running late means loosing points if there is a mystery shopper in there) Like I said, I'm willing to loose any debate, as long as there was something learnt from it. As lame as the stuff I say might be..... Get this, I told a big boss to tell the Biggest boss to have a look at at film-tech forums, she just laughed and said the 'CEO of an international company has better things to do' I said 'Yeah a company with a bad name - internationally' (I think you know which company) That said, it's just not that company, they all seem to be cheap asses - they work to budgets even though seats need repairing, Xenons replaced, sound upgraded, foyer areas need fixing, they say NO your over budget. Then wonder why people are going to the theatre in the next suburb. John said something like, 'if cinema's were run by people who have worked thier way up through the ranks, things would be different'. Bill.
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 06-06-2001 08:06 AM
I don't expect that participating in Film-Tech would be high on the priority list of the President or CEO of a theatre circuit, lab, studio, or equipment manufacturer. But mid-level management who can have a direct impact on the quality of prints and their presentation are missing a golden opportunity if they aren't "tuned in" to the real world discussions found on Film-Tech. Encourage others to participate in Film-Tech. If you see something of interest to a manager or co-worker, pass it along, and tell them where you got it. If you deal with a service or equipment engineer, ask why they don't participate in Film-Tech. If you attend a trade show or business meeting, spread the word! For the almost 800 registered participants, there are probably thousands of "lurkers" who read Film-Tech regularly. One of them may be in a position to solve a long standing problem or change a bad practice. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 06-09-2001 02:46 PM
John, Sadly, most of the 'higher ups' that *I* have come across, both in this industry and others, have operate under the idea "If it's not OUR idea, it's not the right idea". As long as upper mgmt in ANY filed has this mentality things will only progress to get worse. This is not good for anyone. But, when you're in mid-level mgmt, what are you to do? Question authority in risk of retaliation? I am *sure* that there are SEVERAL people on this list who 'lurk'. I know of one lister who submitted a post only to be instructed by oen of his superiors to remove it... Thankfully, it wasn't put that way to me... I'd have politely told them to KISS MY ASS, or something to that effect. I'm straying from the topic, so I'll stop now. I simply believe that, as you said, if someone finds information that helps them on this forum.. USE IT. We have enough damage to our industry as it is... Keeping patrons in seats shoudl be our biggest common goal. You can't do this with crappy presentation, and I don't give a how good your popcorn/soda/candy/nachos/hot dogs/coffee/etc.. is! Enough said...  ------------------ The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 06-09-2001 10:12 PM
quote: Also, I wouldn't want to be responsible for threading a movie that someone else has already partially threaded up. Finding a threading mistake someone else has done is actually more difficult and time consuming than just threading the platter myself.
I agree, Brad. I hate starting a show I didn't thread. Regardless of who did the threading. It's not that I don't trust anyone, but I just don't trust anyone. And I hate when I get interrupted in the middle of threading a projector. If you walk up and start asking me questions (or phone me or walkie-talkie me) while I'm threading, I'm going to ignore you until I'm done. If you're important, you _might_ get a "hold on a sec, I'm almost done". </rant> Uh, what was the topic?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|