Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » More Star Wars B.S. (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: More Star Wars B.S.
Joe Beres
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 606
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 05-01-2002 10:34 AM      Profile for Joe Beres   Email Joe Beres   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If any of you hear about EP II being shown in dlp in the Twin Cities Area, please elt me know. I would love to do a comparison between the and film versions.


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-01-2002 10:37 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I suspect the "reported" 45-foot limit is mostly an issue of current DLP-Cinema projectors not having enough screen luminance (AFAIK, the goal is currently 12 footlamberts) on larger screens. Remember, a 60 x 25 foot "scope" image requires almost TWICE the light of a 45 x 18.75 foot image. Many theatres have screens larger than 45 feet wide.

Bob Maar: I watched the Digital Cinema presentation of "Star Wars Episode 1: The Phantom Menace" several times each at both the Paramus NJ and Secaucus NJ theatres. I recall new screens had been installed, along with "beefed up" sound systems, personally supervised by Tom Lipiec of Lucasfilm. At the time, they were using the high-capacity (400 GB?) Pluto Raid Array that had relatively "mild" compression. My issues with the DLP-Cinema image quality were mostly those of pixel visibility, "jaggies", color gamut, tone scale, and black level.
------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 05-01-2002 12:18 PM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why is the goal 12 ft. lamberts? Isn't industry standard 16?

------------------
This one time, at Projection Camp, I stuck a xenon bulb....

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-01-2002 12:23 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ken asked: "Why is the goal 12 ft. lamberts? Isn't industry standard 16?"

When you project a film print, the "white" areas of the print actually absorb a little light, so 16 footlamberts "open gate" ends up as about 12 footlamberts on the screen. Experience has shown that a digital cinema projector set up to project a "white" at 12 footlamberts is the closest match for white level.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-01-2002 12:25 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As I understand it, 12fl with DLP is equivalent to 16fl with film. The reason for this is that 16fl. is measured with no film in the gate; since film base material (polyester, acetate, nitrate) is slightly less than clear, there is some light loss even when running "clear" film. With DLP, the screen brightness is measured while projecting "white" light, which is equivalent to "clear" film.

Actually, the DLP presentations that I have seen have all been brighter than film projected at 16fl, which I suspect is partly a result of a lack of standards and partly a deliberate choice, since most people equate "brighter" with "better" (as with sound, where "louder" is usually thought to be "better").

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 05-01-2002 12:29 PM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As a side point, I assume that when measuring the light with no film in the gate, you keep the projector running to a.) include the effects of the shutter when taking measurments and b.) avoid damage to the lens?

------------------
This one time, at Projection Camp, I stuck a xenon bulb....

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-01-2002 12:30 PM      Profile for Greg Mueller   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Mueller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Lucas has said that no theater will be allowed to show Episode III unless it is equipped with digital projectors."

Am I the only one who remembers that this is exactly the same threat that they used about episode two when episode one came out.
Better stomp your foot a little harder George

------------------
Greg Mueller
Amateur Astronomer, Machinist, Filmnut
http://www.muellersatomics.com/

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-01-2002 12:40 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ken asked: "I assume that when measuring the light with no film in the gate, you keep the projector running to a.) include the effects of the shutter when taking measurments and b.) avoid damage to the lens?"

Yes. Standard SMPTE 196M specifies: "Measurement of the screen luminance shall be made with the projector in normal operation (with shutter running), with its lens set at the focus position, but with no film in the aperture."

Even with the shutter running, with large lamps it is important to limit the time for "raw" radiant energy going through the lens, as some lenses may not be able to cope with the heat and be permanently damaged. In other words, take your measurements quickly, then let the lens cool before you do it again.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.