|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Teen's Parent Complains - What would you have done?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 08-27-2003 10:54 AM
quote: I have no use for onery little pricks either, but is it not more than a little hypocritical to be harsh on them for using 'swear words' when most films they see (or want to see) are filled with such verbage and bad behaviour??
If a business doesn't want such activity, why promote (and celebrate) it in your product?? I'm speaking of the 'entertainment' industry in general, not individual theatres, which have little choice over what gets made into so-called entertainment.
Big double-standard, IMHO.
First of all, if a film has a substantial amount of vulgar language, it's going to be rated R and the little pricks, as you call them, aren't supposed to be in there in the first place.
Second of all, behavior on film is not an excuse for behavior in life and never was. If they go to see a Western, do we then say it's a double standard when we arrest them for having a shoot-out on the street?
Film, novels, as well as many other forms of entertainment are fantasies. It's not a double-standard to ask youth to understand the difference between those fantasies and real life.
But there is one area where I think this is a problem and that is radio and some reality television. The language on radio has gotten ridiculous - we're at the point where "anything goes". And since this happens within the context of ordinary discussion or "documentary" footage, it makes it appear that this type of discourse is totally acceptable within any public forum.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 08-28-2003 03:38 PM
I had an instance a couple of years ago when a group of 12-14 year olds, about six of them, tried the exact same thing. I eventually was tired of the routine, and called the sheriff's office. The officer that responded actually knew one of the kids, the ringleader himself. It turns out this kid was the son of his duty seargent.
He explained to me that he could not site these kids because it could get him reassigned to more meanial traffic duty. So the kids were allowed to continue to behave like little dorks repeatedly day after day, according to this wimp.
I instead offered to call Aaron Kennard, our county sheriff, and discuss the matter with him and get his view on the problem. He instead offered to talk to the little brats.
After the conversation, I never saw them again. However, the officer did tell me that the kid was rather a rude prick and was not going to listen to reason. The officer told him that if he didn't vacate permanantly, that I was going to go to the county sherrif himself, and file a complaint against his dad. This seemed to get his attention.
I hate little pricks.
Dave
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|