my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Should the projectionist on duty ever be the floor manager on duty at the same time? (Page 2)

This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3

Author Topic: Should the projectionist on duty ever be the floor manager on duty at the same time? Rachel Craven Madam Moderator Posts: 2190 From: Pensacola, FL Registered: Dec 2000 posted 11-28-2003 10:47 AM                     We do manager/projectionist for our 6-screen. Every day of the week, including weekends. At my last theater, some of the shifts were covered by a manager/projectionist for a 7-screen, never on the weekend though.  |  IP: Logged Tony Ratcliff Expert Film Handler Posts: 216 From: Madison, IN, USA Registered: Mar 2002 posted 11-28-2003 12:17 PM                     Unfortunately economics plays the biggest role in this question. I own and operate a 2 screen. I would dearly love to have a projectionist AND a manager. But it is just not feasible dollar wise. Fortunately the configuration of the building allows for easy access to the booths by the manager/projectionist from the floor. This situation makes it doubly important to make sure you keep up with your projector maintenance. On the other hand, I think it may be just upper management greed that keeps a 12-plex from having both a manager AND projectionist on duty. It may not even be the fault of the theatre's managing director. He/she may be being given a budget that cannot allow for it. I've been in many a multi-plex where I KNEW that a projectionist was on duty and the presentation was far inferior to the presentation at my theatre. It still goes back to how much people care about Film Done Right.  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-28-2003 01:29 PM                        Personally, I think having a dedicated projectionist is even more important in singles than in multiplexes. First, it's even more important that singles never lose shows, as a dark screen results in a loss of 100% of the night's revenue, rather than 10% or whatever applies to a particular multiplex. Second, if anything were to go wrong in a show at a single, the manager would need to be available to explain the problem to the audience, offer passes, and generally deal with customers. He can't do this while he's also upstairs in the booth actually fixing the problem. Thus, either customer service or speed in fixing the problem gets compromised. Finally, in most singles, booth access requires walking through the auditorium. It would be distracting to customers to have a manager walking through the auditorium (even just in the back of the theatre) several times per show to check on the equipment. Operating mechanical equipment and providing customer service are two completely different jobs which can rarely be done well by the same person, particularly at the same time. I'm not saying that there aren't people who could do it, but that they are hard to find and harder to keep employed. Having said that, I will say that the manager-operator thing "might" work in a well designed theatre with a handful of screens that is otherwise well staffed, with well maintained equipment, good automation with start timers, and knowledgeable and caring employees. If I were to design a single to run this way, I'd go with automated changeovers and 6000' reels so that the manager wouldn't need to enter the booth between shows (since his presence would be needed in the lobby), since the first reel would already be threaded up. The second reel could be rewound and threaded after the show starts.  |  IP: Logged Dennis M Dow Jr Expert Film Handler Posts: 141 From: Bloomfield NJ USA Registered: Oct 2003 posted 11-28-2003 04:07 PM                       When I worked for UA (as asst mgr), we always had 2 managers on duty as well as an operator (non-union of course).. The other managers I worked with had no idea how to turn on the equip much less run it therefore the need for operators... after I left they decided to do away with the operators and have managers run the booth.... heard it didn't go to well... Now I enjoy working strictly as an operator(union)with no annoying customers or staff to worry about  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 11-28-2003 11:09 PM                        While on a puritanical level, I would agree that even a single screener should have someone monitoring the presentation at all times, in practicality it is these theatres that, for the most part, are least economically able to do so. Yes... the singles are probably most motivated to maintain their audience... whatever it is. However, in a market where (as has been observed elsewhere within this board) the film companys take huge percentages out of the first two or three weeks while producing films that don't last more than a month or so, the singles are most likely to have the tightest budgets. Owner-operators are the exception... as are markets that are fortunate enough to be the few not yet overscreened. Even as a quad... when there is someone in the booth, pretty much dedicated to presentation, it's usually me, on the busy days... and I'm not yet sure that I make as much as my staff downstairs does!  |  IP: Logged Gracia L. Babbidge Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 709 From: Bowdoin, Maine Registered: Aug 2000 posted 11-29-2003 12:54 AM                        When I worked for a chain that has lots of multiplexes, I ended up working at two of the 10-plexes, projectionists were few, operators were many, and whichever was in the booth was expected to do many things outside of the booth. I can recally many times, on Sundays, sometimes all day, sometimes from mid-matinee to close, I played the part of manager on duty and projectionist. I do not advise it. Less than optimal for the entire operation of the cinema.  |  IP: Logged Don Bruechert Mmmmmmmmm, bird! Posts: 340 From: Manitowoc, WI, USA Registered: Jan 2003 posted 11-29-2003 05:32 PM                        I'm in the same 6-plex as Rachel. We're expected to do everything. Open up, supervise staff, deal with whiny customers, run the booth and do the books. Some real challenges present themselves. 3 booths are on the same floor as the office, and the other 3 are in a "tower" configuration in a converted single screen. Oftentimes the start times are 5 minutes apart. The first batch isn't bad because you can lace them up ahead of time, but after that it can get annoying - especially when the film is supposed to restart 15 - 20 minutes after the safeties drop on average. Now toss in some other hurdles like certain days of the week we are only allowed to have one staffer besides the Manager - the manager usually ends up downstairs doing box, so the staffer can do concessions (otherwise the staffer is expected to do both) and runs between the booth to start the movie and the box, or hits the remote start button on the wall of the booth and hopes God is in a good mood that day. While the movies are running we do things like sweep up, print accounting reports to be faxed to the main office, build up and tear down prints, create the movie schedule in the box office computer, and other management tasks. less than 1/2 hour after the last show starts all the CON/BOX employees go home, and we sit in the office and count up the day, key in final inventory and the like. Just one of us, and the lobby video monitor... Those of us who are motivated enough will take the time to do at least one sound and picture check during a shift, and walk the booths a couple of times looking for odd noises or potential brain wraps. Miraculously, through all this we still manage to give the customers a pretty good experience. Small birds make a sound which perfectly describes the owner of our theater. We have come up with numerous ways to make him or save him more money, including several creative staffing options to increase staff during the busiest times, while not going over the payroll budget, and he fights us every step of the way... Eventually there comes a time where you take pride in doing the best job that you can for the customers, and everything else just kinda slides along... For $7.50 an hour it's just gotta be our pride in doing a good job that keeps it going, because it sure as hell ain't the money!  |  IP: Logged Travis Hubrig Expert Film Handler Posts: 175 From: Minot ND, USA Registered: May 2003 posted 11-30-2003 04:18 PM                     I believe it all depends on the design of the theatre, and the business levels. I run a 7 that might see 20 customers between noon and 6pm, Mon thru Thurs. I CAN'T have a manager and operator. Many times I only have one other employee working the floor to sell tickets and concessions. On the weekends I always have somebody working upstairs, and somebody downstairs. Our booth and office is all together, nothing added on, or difficult such as mulitple booth locations. Starting the movies, checking the shows, than helping the cashier has never been a problem.  |  IP: Logged Nathan Guerriero Film Handler Posts: 43 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 12-15-2003 03:39 AM                     I am a manager and operator on every single shift I work at the theatre. I feel that having to do both jobs makes me less effiective at each. However, within our company, this situation is absolutely not negotiable. During my tenure at the theatre, I have encounted pretty much all of the situations so far mentioned. I would rate my proficiency as an operator as fairly high, but managing at the same time negates that advantage. I would avoid this scenario at all costs.  |  IP: Logged Beth Smith Film Handler Posts: 11 From: Glen Burnie, MD, USA Registered: Nov 2002 posted 12-24-2003 02:44 PM                     I run a two screen art house and we only run with one manager/projectionist. Even on the weekends.. It does tend to cause problems from time to time. I may have an employee call out sick on any given day, or have to fire one and then I have to cover their position as well as run the floor and the booth. It's not always the most effective way to go.. I don't recommend running a theatre without a projectionist at all times..but hey..I just do what I'm told.  |  IP: Logged Kevin Wale Expert Film Handler Posts: 167 From: Guymon, OK USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 12-24-2003 09:42 PM                     Hey Beth, your actually not very far from me. I'm in Northern VA.  |  IP: Logged Chris Liczbinski Film Handler Posts: 33 From: US Registered: Oct 2003 posted 12-30-2003 02:12 AM                    I agree with the many others that say 4 screens and up you need someone dedicated to the booth, but here is another question- at how many screens would you require 2 projectionists per shift? I work at a 15-plex setup in an H pattern with 3 projectors in one side of the H and 4 in the other, we clean the projector every show so it takes a few minutes to thread. I am wondering because i see AMC's huge theaters they are building with 24 and 30 screens and could not imagine having a high standard of presentation PLUS looking after 30 projectors.  |  IP: Logged Rachel Craven Madam Moderator Posts: 2190 From: Pensacola, FL Registered: Dec 2000 posted 12-30-2003 09:09 AM                     quote: Hey Beth, your actually not very far from me. I'm in Northern VA. Kevin, Why don't you change where you are from then...  |  IP: Logged Bill Langfield Master Film Handler Posts: 280 From: Prospect, NSW, Australia Registered: Apr 2001 posted 12-30-2003 12:42 PM                        Oh, yeah the bio/manager thing. Been there done that. 1st case location - Me and a 'security guard' from 9.30 until close. 2nd case location - Me alone from 10.00 until close. Thank God I dont work for that company anymore. And BTW, the reason they make you do it is NOT for the budget, it so the AREA manager gets a bonus, because you are doing the job of two people for $1 more an hour. At one point, I was Projectionist/Manager,running around doing ushering/point,Candy,Box and cleaner in ONE shift. And all this from the person who owns the company who is the richest person in the country. (But I doubt he knows this crap went on) It's a total rip off. Bill. ps However it was a kind of fun four years at the time.  |  IP: Logged Kevin Wale Expert Film Handler Posts: 167 From: Guymon, OK USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 12-30-2003 12:56 PM                     quote: Kevin, Why don't you change where you are from then... There, happy? I actually thought I had. I guess it didn't go through. I only frequent 8 forums so it's not always a priority to keep my profiles up to date.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.