Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » An R-Card for Teens? (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: An R-Card for Teens?
Gunnar Johansson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 181
From: Gothenburg, Sweden
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 06-10-2004 05:14 PM      Profile for Gunnar Johansson   Author's Homepage   Email Gunnar Johansson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thatīs the way it is in Sweden, and it doesnīt seem to work out to bad.

We have allowed for children, 7, 11 and 15. If you are a parent (or guardian) you can bring your kid to "the next level", i.e. a 10 year old can see the movie rated for 11, if accompanied by an adult. This applies to all ages except 15. No matter if your parent is there do you get in. And itīs the law. Thereīs a sign on the door saying that you may be requested to show ID.

I saw Harry Potter 3 today, in a matinee (I was stupid and wasnīt thinking) and next to me was a kid who was probably not old enough to see it, but his mommy was there and covered his eyes in certain sequences. Seemed okay. Now all the older people behaving badly, and the LOUD candy bags is another thing...

 |  IP: Logged

Julie Havlin
Film Handler

Posts: 9
From: St. Louis, MO
Registered: May 2004


 - posted 06-10-2004 11:08 PM      Profile for Julie Havlin   Email Julie Havlin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Call me a cynic, but I can imagine that this R card is some sort of studio influence as a way to increase gross for R films, as well as endear the theatre to any studio for booking privlidges.
As mentioned previously, many films are cut down to get that PG-13 rating so they can get the young teenager's $.

I absolutely agree that R is far too broad a rating. Anyone here see the Australian comedy "The Castle" from 1998 (or so)? Wonderful film, and very family-friendly in my opinion, except the f word is used about 4 times, and as a way to expressing anger, not an adjective, hence an R rating. I talked many families into see that, and they all loved it.

And the thing that really irks me about parents and R rating is the comments I get all the time at my theatre.
"Why is Film A rated R?"
Well, it has some sex scenes in it.
"Oh no, I don't let my kids watch movies with sex in them. Why is Film B rated R?"
That has an extreme amount of violence.
"No sex? OK"

Why is sex censored more than violence by most parents? It's okay to watch a guy get blown open, but no T&A?

What happened to make love, not war?

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 06-10-2004 11:15 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Julie Havlin
Why is sex censored more than violence by most parents?
Good question being that MOST 13-17 year olds know more about sex than their parents.

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-11-2004 12:44 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe with Valenti out of the MPAA we will finally see some movement on subdividing the R category and/or creating a new "A - Adults Only" rating.

 |  IP: Logged

Pravin Ratnam
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 844
From: Atlanta, GA,USA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 06-11-2004 01:55 PM      Profile for Pravin Ratnam   Email Pravin Ratnam   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Julie Havlin
Why is sex censored more than violence by most parents? It's okay to watch a guy get blown open, but no T&A?

What happened to make love, not war

Ratings are not morality based. I feel uncomfortable watching certain sex scenes with my parents compared to violent scenes not because I think violent scenes are wholesome. Violence is all around us right from childhood. It is not as private a concept as sex. Kids dabble in sexuality related stuff too, but nothing explicit.

You are talking about an age appropriate comfort factor with parents.

But I agree R is too broad a classification. But our system is better than the stricter system in europe. Who is some national board to tell a 14 year old that he CANNOT see a certain movie because it is rated 15 or whatever. We have that in the US but only to very few movies such as the NC17 ones. And some of the foreign ratings for Harry Potter is downright stupid.

Maybe the should have a PG-18 and an R. Movies like the Matrix sequels can be PG-18. Theaters and websites can always have a description of why the movie is rated R.

I support the R Card. If the parents are irresponsible, leave it up to them. Their kids are probably doing worse things out there and theaters have no control over that.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Shingleton
Film Handler

Posts: 63
From: Richmond, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 06-11-2004 10:32 PM      Profile for Andrew Shingleton   Email Andrew Shingleton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually that's another point. The NC-17 rating is effectively useless, and if it was better utalised it would certainly ease the pressure on the R rating and stop it being a broad net to catch all movies from Dark City to Basic Instinct. What's the point of having an adult rating, if the rating itself effectively makes the film commercially unviable. It doesn't just have to denote a porn film, it can be used for films with strong adult themes too.

If the NC-17 rating didn't sound the death nell for a film at the box office (and therefore made it open to film makers to be allowed to get rather than forcing them to push the R rating to its limits) then the amount of impact in R rated films could be scaled back. If that happened then the R card would maybe work because you'd know that the movie wouldn't be that extreme or it would have gone in the top rating bracket. Since at the moment R is effectively the top rating bracket already you've got to be careful about applying the restrictions properly.

 |  IP: Logged

Nate Lehrke
Master Film Handler

Posts: 396
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 06-30-2004 05:39 AM      Profile for Nate Lehrke   Email Nate Lehrke   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Since there is already enough threads about Fahrenheit 9/11 and this kinda fits, Ill post it here.

I'm thinking an R card wouldn't be a bad idea.

quote:
BY CHRIS HEWITT
Pioneer Press

Hollywood's R rating is supposed to mean "Restricted." But, for many teenagers who want to see "Fahrenheit 9/11," it means "Rules are made to be broken."

Michael Moore's R-rated anti-President Bush, anti-Iraq war documentary was the No. 1 movie last weekend, raking in $21.8 million, 100 times as much as Moore's previous film, "Bowling for Columbine," did on its opening weekend.

"It did very well everywhere in the Twin Cities. Suburbs, too," said Hugh Wronski, city manager for Landmark Theatres, which had "Fahrenheit 9/11" on three screens. Wronski said "Fahrenheit" sold out "almost all" of its showings over the weekend.

A good chunk of that money undoubtedly came from teenagers who — encouraged by Moore on his Web site — watched a movie they were supposedly restricted from seeing. (A picture of the crowd at Minneapolis' Lagoon Theatre is posted on Moore's Web site, www.michaelmoore.com.)

"I want all teenagers to see this film. There is nothing in the film in terms of violence that we didn't see on TV every night at the dinner hour during the Vietnam War," Moore wrote on his site. "I trust all of you teenagers out there will find your way into a theater to see this movie."

Find their way in, they did. "Fahrenheit 9/11" was rated R for brief scenes of wartime brutality, including a beheading, and because of a 12-letter curse word used repeatedly by a soldier in an interview. Moore unsuccessfully appealed the rating, which states that, "Under 17 requires accompanying parent or guardian," but a check of several area theaters reveals that many under-17 moviegoers will have little trouble getting into "Fahrenheit 9/11" or any other R-rated movie.

"The R rating doesn't bother me," said Alex Cortes, 16, attending an afternoon showing of "Fahrenheit 9/11" alone at the Regal theaters in Eagan. "I knew I was going to see it one way or another."

The way he saw it? Alex, who lives in Eagan, simply bought a ticket to "Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story" and slipped into "Fahrenheit 9/11" instead. There's nothing illegal about that, although theaters frown on it, and, ironically, it takes money out of Moore's pocket, since "Dodgeball" gets credit for his ticket sale.

"It's a voluntary system. It does not have a legal backing at all," said Phuong Yokitis, director of public affairs for the Motion Picture Association of America, which devised the ratings system in 1968. "Theater owners are in partnership with us to make it an effective system, and my understanding is that the vast majority of them do cooperate."

The Eagan theaters certainly do. Numerous signs warn underage patrons they will be asked to show IDs. Greg Boone, who just turned 17, was also at the Eagan theater Friday, watching "Fahrenheit 9/11," his first legit, unaccompanied-by-parent-or-guardian R-rated movie. But Greg, a Burnsville resident, has used a variety of methods to get into restricted films.

When he wanted to see "Kill Bill, Vol. 2," Greg asked a friend to buy the ticket ahead of time and drop it off at Greg's workplace. When he went to the since-closed Burnsville theaters, IDs were never checked. When Greg went to R-rated movies at Lakeville, management there required his mother, Joan, to sign the back of his tickets, giving him permission to attend.

"I thought that was a good idea," Joan said. "I appreciated it. I think it's an individual choice, really, about whether children should go to R-rated movies, depending on the child and their knowledge."

For Mike Gaudette, a 16-year-old from Mound, it depends more on where you go.

"The Mann theaters in Plymouth won't let you in if you're under 17, but, sometimes, the theaters in Delano don't check," said Mike, who has not seen "Fahrenheit 9/11" yet but plans to.

Mike said his parents don't care if he goes to R-rated movies, as long as he clears them in advance. Sometimes, movie theaters help with that — when he attends R-rated movies at the Waconia Theatres, they call home to check that it's OK with his folks.

Other times, that's not necessary. "It's easier to get in if you hang out with people who look older than you. Then, maybe you won't get carded. If you go with younger people, they're way more likely to ask for ID," said Mike, who has attended "lots" of R-rated films.

Even ID checks aren't foolproof. Alyssa Diamond, 16, of Minneapolis was carded when she went to see "Troy," but the ticket-taker let her in, anyway. "I didn't know if he was illiterate or just didn't care," she said.

The latter, probably. Alyssa, who works at the AMC Southdale theaters, said she has so little trouble getting into R-rated movies that she's often not even aware of a movie's rating.

"Like, with 'Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind,' I didn't even realize it was rated R. But if I told my mom I was seeing the movie, she wouldn't care," she said, who offers a tip: "If you just ask really nonchalant and have a confident attitude, most theaters won't bother you."

Alyssa said it does bug her to see parents bringing 10-year-olds into "hard-core, violent, R movies," but she doesn't see any reason to bar teenagers from them. In fact, she has a different way of using the ratings system than its originators intended.

"You can kind of tell what's going to be in a movie by the rating," she said.

"Yeah," agrees Cedar Schimke, 16, Minneapolis. "G is just going to be a kids' movie."

"If it's G, basically, you need to pay me to see it. And if it's PG, it will be corny," Alyssa said. "PG-13 is where it gets better."

"Waconia Theatres, they call home to check that it's OK with his folks." I cant imagine calling people's homes to get permission for a film!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.