|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Legal? Showing DVDs for free?
|
Jeffry L. Johnson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 809
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 04-11-2004 01:22 PM
Copyright Law of the United States of America and Related Laws Contained in Title 17 of the United States Code
Circular 92 Chapter 1 Subject Matter and Scope of Copyright
quote: To perform or display a work “publicly” means —
(1) to perform or display it at a place open to the public or at any place where a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances is gathered; or
(2) to transmit or otherwise communicate a performance or display of the work to a place specified by clause (1) or to the public, by means of any device or process, whether the members of the public capable of receiving the performance or display receive it in the same place or in separate places and at the same time or at different times.
Public Performance of Video Recordings quote: Public Performance of Video Recordings A quick explanation on how to avoid breaking the law:
Students often want to show movies or videos in our classrooms and auditoriums for their clubs, organizations, or just for fun. Unless you acquire the tapes with public performance rights you will be breaking the copyright law. You cannot just go to the video store, rent a video or DVD and show it in a public space because these copies are not licensed for public performance. Even if you do not charge an admission for the movie you are still breaking the law.
In order to be legal you have to get the tape or DVD from a vendor that rents you the movie with public performance rights. This can be expensive and may cost hundreds of dollars per tape.
The only exception to this rule is if an instructor shows the video in a classroom and the activity is a teaching activity and not recreation or entertainment. This situation would not be considered a violation of copyright law.
A few places to rent tapes or DVDs with public performance rights. (We usually use Swank):
Swank Motion Pictures, Inc., 1-800-876-5577 Kino International, 1-800-562-3330 New Yorker Films, 1-877-247-6200 Criterion Pictures USA, 1-800-890-9494 Modern Sound Pictures, 1-402-341-8476
Read on for more detailed information: What is a copyrighted video recording?
Copyright is a property right that gives the copyright owner of an original work a bundle of exclusive rights, which include the right to authorize or prohibit reproduction, derivative works, distribution, and public performance or display of that work. You can bet that every videotape you own or rent is copyrighted.
What is a "Public Performance"?
Section 101 of the copyright law says that a performance is public if it is in a public place or if it is in any place if "a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its acquaintances" is gathered there.
Thus, the factors to consider in determining whether a performance is public include whether the place is public and the size and composition of the audience. For example, if the place where the performance takes place is a public place (open to the public), how many and what kind of people attend is not important.
By definition it is a public performance. Virtually every auditorium, classroom, meeting room, and dorm lounge on the campus is to be considered a public place, so screening a video there is considered a public performance. Where the place of performance is not open to the public (Like your dorm room, where the public can be excluded), and every one there was your friend, the performance would most likely not be considered as public and you would be legal.
The teaching exception:
Even if a proposed performance might be considered a public performance, there may not be an infringement because the copyright law places further limits upon the performance right of copyright owners in Sections 110(1), (2) and (4).4 Section 110(1) says that performances that take place in the face-to-face teaching activities of a nonprofit educational institution are not an infringement of the copyright owner's right.
Following are the elements of each exemption that must be satisfied in order for an otherwise public performance to be exempt:
1. Section 110(1) (Teaching Activities of a Nonprofit Educational Institution): * The performance must be performed by the instructor or pupil(s) (not by a performance artist); * The instructor and pupil(s) must be in the same place (transmissions by television, etc., do not qualify here although they may qualify under 110(2) below); * The activity must be a teaching activity and not recreation or entertainment; * The activity must be put on by a nonprofit educational institution; * The activity must take place in a classroom or other area used as a classroom for systematic instructional activity; and * In the case of performance of a videotape or movie, the copy of the work performed must have been lawfully made. For example, one cannot show an archival copy of a videotape since it would not have been made in accordance with the provisions of the copyright law.
Updated: May 19, 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Kaufman
Film Handler
Posts: 16
From: San Pedro, CA, USA
Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted 04-26-2004 12:46 PM
Both ASCAP and BMI are forever on the prowl, looking for ANYONE, be it store, office, elevator, or whatever, playing music covered under their respective licensing agreements. Musak and Musak-like services hold the license, which makes it legal for those using their service, but slipping a CD into a store P.A. is a huge no-no and eventually, they'll get a letter saying pay up or turn it off.
Royalties are paid to the respective creators and owners of the music. ASCAP says by playing the music as background, one is enjoying the work of another and the other is entitled to payment for that creation. And know too, this is not a recent happening. They've been doing this for decades. If anything, it's MPAA and the studios, who've only recently jumped on this bandwagon.
I've a friend who owns a dinner cruise biz and he was slapped many years ago for playing CD's as patrons boarded the boat to head out for a publicly advertised sail and dinner. He told the ASCAP guy to bring him a list of all of the covered music. The guy went to the car, opened the trunk and produced a HUGE book of fine print listings. He was told to leave it and they'd check it to be sure they'd only play music in the public domain. By the way, if it was a charter, they could play whatever they wanted as that was a private function.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Schmidt
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 172
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 05-02-2004 05:55 AM
Within the United States, despite all of the confusion and propaganda to the contrary being spread about by the MPAA and RIAA, it is still fully legal for any of us to make a copy of ANYTHING for personal private use, including both movies and songs. Usually movie copies will be made by individuals on VHS tape, since this is easiest even though the quality isn't as good as dvd, but recently there is all sorts of software that can copy dvds to blank dvds. This comes under the "fair use" doctrine of the "copyright equation," where there is a theoretical balance between the interests of copyright holders and those of the general public. In time everything is supposed to pass into the public domain. However.....
Recently the mouse house and MPAA, et al paid huge sums of money under the table to our crooked congress [oops! sorry! political contributions] to buy the mickey mouse copyright extension law which runs it all out for another 20 years. This was appealed to the Supreme Court, which declined to over-rule, but remarked sort of that what congress did was bad law and not very good public policy... still congress had the right to make bad law if it wanted to. I guess the court didn't this this was all that important in the overall scheme of things so they let it stand.
What's going on now is that the MPAA is hoping to achieve with technology what they cannot do legally: that is, they cannot STOP people from making copies of movies for their own personal use because in court they will lose. Instead, they want to stop all recording by individuals in the digital domain with techniques such as the "broadcast flag," which when turned on will prevent recording. If they get this the flag will of course be turned on all the time for everything.
In other words, **technology** will be used to stop people from doing what cannot be stopped **legally.** It will take a while for the reality of this to settle in, but people are gonna be mad like hell when it starts to affect them.
Eventually a test case will reach the Supreme Court. Usually precedent is very important in law, and if precedent set by the Betamax case of 1984 holds, my guess is the broadcast flag and all similar gimmickry will be ruled illegal. But it's going to take years for us to get there.
Meanwhile, avoid all new microsoft software and the XP operating system unless there is something **very specific** you need to do where you must have it. "Don't Upgrade Anything!!!" You may be very, very sorry; countless folks who have "upgraded" to this have been. In years to come, CD's with the 98SE operating system are going to be like gold, once everything else is all wrapped up in DRM [digital rights management] with all sorts of unpopular restrictions.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Tim Lockridge
Film Handler
Posts: 20
From: Indiana, USA
Registered: Jul 2002
|
posted 05-02-2004 12:50 PM
quote: Joe Schmidt Meanwhile, avoid all new microsoft software and the XP operating system unless there is something **very specific** you need to do where you must have it. "Don't Upgrade Anything!!!" You may be very, very sorry; countless folks who have "upgraded" to this have been. In years to come, CD's with the 98SE operating system are going to be like gold, once everything else is all wrapped up in DRM [digital rights management] with all sorts of unpopular restrictions.
I realize we're going offtrack here... but what? If you're worried about DRM or other OS restrictions, you'd be better off with Linux, not win9x. The only reason people should be sorry for upgrading to XP is for hardware incompatibility, not for DRM issues. The operating system has little to do with copyright protections... those safeguards are built into individual file types. For example, Apple's OS X is probably the best Operating System on the market as far as user security, depth, and power are concerned. Apple's new "Fair Play" DRM -- part of their much hyped iTunes store -- is encoded into individual files... not into the operating system.
Besides, the companies designing these rights management procedures are only trying to protect their perceived interests. You can't really fault them for that.
And again, if you have problems with Microsoft or Apple, there's always Linux/BSD/etc. In this age where a few copyright holders may be a bit overzealous in enforcing restrictions, we -- as consumers -- are blessed with quite a few options.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|