|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: More Cell Phone Justice
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 08-03-2004 10:52 AM
quote: Scott Jentsch Not to throw water on this rant fire you guys have going on, but have you considered that some people need their cell phones to keep in contact in case of emergency?
In which case, they shouldn't put themselves in situations where using mobile 'phones is antisocial. Anyone who has a job which requires them to be 'on call' during time not at work is likely to be a professional earning a decent salary (for example, according to a Sunday newspaper feature a couple of weeks ago, the average hospital doctor earns £68k, i.e. around US$100k, a year). Is it really that much to ask for them to refrain from taking their mobile 'phones into places where a majority of those present find them offensive? After all, it's not to much to ask me to refrain from smoking in many public places and observing a whole load of other byelaws and regulations which are put there to provide a pleasant environment for the majority of people. Why should the use of mobile 'phones be any different?
And if you do accept that principle, what do you define as an 'emergency'? There is the risk of a slippery slope here. If it's agreed by a majority of cinema customers that using mobiles in the auditorium is disruptive, however it's done, then the only way you're going to stop the mindless minority is either by convincing them that their safety is at risk (which, in the case of mobiles, would be nigh on impossible) or by adopting a zero tolerance policy.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 08-04-2004 06:02 AM
quote: Scott Jentsch
quote: Leo Enticknap was the last to post some people need their cell phones to keep in contact in case of emergency?
What did these "critical" people do before cell phones? They never allowed themselves to go to the movies? What they did was, they gave the theatre manager's phone number to the hospital or whoever it was that had to reach them in a emergency. They informed the theatre manager that they were in the house and in what seat. In a REAL emergency, the hospital would call the theatre and we would send an usher down to the doctor's seat and get him. Most theatres have had similar procedures in place for decades to deal with this exact situation.
As Gordon say, because someone chooses to use this technology, it doesn't place everyone else under any obligation to facilitate it. Do we now have to avoid the use of construction materials like steel and cement because it might cause cell transmission dead-spots? In two of our theatres cell phone reception is practically zero. To bad; that's life. You can't get cell reception everywhere on the planet. And the theatre owner isn't under any obligation to insure you can get reception in his theatre. As a courtesy we will post the fact that there is poor to no cell reception. It's the patrons' choice not to put buy the ticket if they feel they absolutely must have cell reception at all times.
And you know, there are plenty of locations where the cell phone simply doesn't work at all. Are doctors supposed to avoid going to these places althogether? I've been layed up in a hospital a few times and noticed that when was lying there screaming in pain and I demanded that the nurse called my doctor's office to OK my getting an asperin, she would always come back saying they couldn't reach him....evidently cell phones don't work on golf courses.
Nope, these "important" people should keep the cell phone off and check the incoming calls a few times during the film if they feel they absolutely have to. And let's face it, if a doctor has a patient whose life is hanging by a thread between life and death, and he's the ONLY doctor who knows what to do to save the guy, then perhaps the good doctor shouldn't have picked this particular 2 hours to go see a movie. Hey, even the most gifted doctors are not THAT indispensible that being out of touch for the length of a film will cause people to drop dead like flys.
And someone who IS so important that armies can't move or space shuttles can't launch unless they are within a phone call's reach, then you know that they've got enough money to arrange their own private screenings in their own private screening rooms and they shouldn't be coming to theatres to bother the rest of us.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004
|
posted 08-10-2004 01:49 AM
Here in New Zealand, we have a voluntary fire service. Thats right, the firefighters are all members of the community who answer the call when needed, and are not paid. They all have normal jobs and lives.
How do the firemen know that they are needed?

I should state here that this thing is on top of the building in which we show movies. Thats a benefit of being in the tallest building in the village, I guess...
Standing instructions are when this thing goes off, stop the movie and put on the house lights. (a) because the audience cant hear the film (hell, in the booth you cant hear yourself think), and (b) several members of the audience will be departing in a bit of a rush to the fire station, which is conveniently next door.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 08-13-2004 05:35 AM
Cell and satellite phones have certainly been used by terrorists and drug dealers:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=11732282&method=full&siteid=50143
quote: OSAMA bin Laden has phoned the UK at least 260 times, it was revealed yesterday.
Records from the terrorist leader's satellite phone show he and his top men were in constant touch with the British arm of the al-Qaeda network.
The calls were made from their base in Afghanistan to 27 separate numbers.
The calls only stopped after bin Laden became suspicious that American agents were using the satellite phone to track him.
The records show calls made between 1996 and 1998 to a range of addresses including suspected terrorists, al-Qaeda sympathisers, companies and public phone boxes.
More than 200 were made to the London home and mobile phone of Khalid al Fawwaz.
Al Fawwaz had the satellite phone number listed in his address book under the name Atef - bin Laden's military commander. He was the head of an alleged al-Qaeda front group in London called the Advice and Reformation Committee.
He is currently in jail awaiting extradition to the US for his alleged role in the bombings of American embassies in East Africa which killed 224 in 1998.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/waronterrorism/story/0,1373,805677,00.html
quote: Jason Burke in Jalalabad Sunday October 6, 2002 The Observer
Osama bin Laden is alive and regularly meeting Mullah Omar, the fugitive leader of the Taliban, according to a telephone call intercepted by American spy satellites. In the conversation, recorded less than a month ago, Omar and a senior aide were discussing the American-led hunt to track them down. The two men, using a mobile Thuraya satellite phone, spoke about tactics for several minutes. Omar then turned to a third person who was within a few yards of him, voice analysis has revealed. After exchanging a few words, Omar said that 'the sheikh sends his salaams [greetings]'. Senior Taliban figures habitually refer to bin Laden as 'the sheikh'.
Voice analysis appears to corroborate the identification of bin Laden. 'It shows he was alive recently at least,' said a senior Afghan intelligence officer. 'Some people might like to think he is dead, but that's just wishful thinking.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_phone
quote: Satellite phones are also known more simply as "sat phones". They have gained some notoriety in recent years for being used extensively by people hiding in remote areas, such as Osama bin Laden.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|