Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » AMC Booth Procedures. (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: AMC Booth Procedures.
Brian Hogan
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 119
From: Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Registered: Jul 2001


 - posted 03-09-2005 04:21 AM      Profile for Brian Hogan   Email Brian Hogan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
the problem always comes from the projectionist-vs.-manager dilemma. correct me if im wrong, but projectionists HATE when managers (other than the booth manager) tell them what needs to be done. i can understand this to a point because many managers dont really know much when it comes to booth. but for the managers who DO know how things run in the booth, they should step in if they see something not right.

projectionists HATED when i would watch a regularly scheduled movie and then report to them that i found a couple of lab splices a week after it was built and screened. hated me for it because i found them not doing their job AND not paying them for screening that movie because of not doing their job.

 |  IP: Logged

Wolff King Morrow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 490
From: Denton, TX, USA
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 03-09-2005 04:50 AM      Profile for Wolff King Morrow   Author's Homepage   Email Wolff King Morrow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I assume you're looking for a lab splice in that avatar picture? [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Dean Kollet
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 591
From: Florida State University
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 03-09-2005 07:26 AM      Profile for Dean Kollet   Email Dean Kollet   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jim Ziegler
Careful guys.. A projectionist I had working for me I was able to get because he was run out of his booth manager job at a chain for saying stuff on Film-Tech that the chain did not like..
Agreed, but then again, I hope that people think when they are posting. I got in trouble for posting a problem I was having with an SDDS processor. I ended up fixing it 30 minutes before we had a big screening of a movie, but I still got in trouble. And for what? I guess it was 'secret' that AMC (which I didn't say I worked for in any of my posts about the topic) has SDDS processors in a lot of their houses.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 03-09-2005 09:11 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jason Gazaille
What if you DO screen the print, and call the depot to get the reel replaced immediately, and yet you don't get one?
We did our part. As much as we hate the situation, at least we did everything we could, and we get to bitch at someone... in this case, the depot.

quote: Jason Gazaille
What if you get 6 prints from the ETS depot only 7 hours before the first run of the morning?
Well, that would be BAD. And that's exactly what I'm talking about. It's not just the theaters, the distributors and the depots have to get in on this to fix it too. We had our print of Gods & Generals show up less than an hour before the first show. For those that don't remember, that was a 14 reel movie, with an intermission in the MIDDLE of reel 8 - which needed to be located and "cue'd" to bring the lights up and down. We couldn't even build up the trailers while we waited for the print because... the trailers were coming in the can - which is a rant for another thread. Not only was it on screen less than five minutes late, but the print was flawlessly built up, and we were the only theater in town that did NOT cancel the first show. The theater down the street from us put up a sign that said "SOLD OUT" according to our customers.

quote: Jason Gazaille
We do our absolute best at our theatre to screen them as early as possible but if you get no support, is it really worth it?
So do we. And you're right that it sucks that the home office and the movie companies don't back us up in that endeavor. That's why NATO and the MPAA need to get together and make a decision and stick to it.

 |  IP: Logged

Wolff King Morrow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 490
From: Denton, TX, USA
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 03-09-2005 03:54 PM      Profile for Wolff King Morrow   Author's Homepage   Email Wolff King Morrow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Dean Kollet
Agreed, but then again, I hope that people think when they are posting. I got in trouble for posting a problem I was having with an SDDS processor. I ended up fixing it 30 minutes before we had a big screening of a movie, but I still got in trouble. And for what? I guess it was 'secret' that AMC (which I didn't say I worked for in any of my posts about the topic) has SDDS processors in a lot of their houses.

I heard from a tech that AMC has an aggressive zero-tolerance policy against employees posting on Film-Tech about procedures. I can understand certain things need to be kept confidential, but when you're merely asking for help on a technical issue, theater chains should be thankful you care enough about your job to get the answers you need.

 |  IP: Logged

James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 03-09-2005 04:59 PM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wolff, that's pretty stupid, but it wouldn't surprise me.
I ran came across a few myself who really discouraged use of this site period.
I was once told that there were some who though I was a bright guy, but I "just needed to get off that Film-Tech site" which made me laugh.
No one ever told me that I COULDN'T post though.
Not that I would let them tell me that in the first place.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 03-09-2005 10:14 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know some folks get their feathers ruffled when I post here, but I've never been told not to either.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-09-2005 10:23 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Face it guys, there will always be some of the higher-ups who are greatly embarassed when one of their workers post something that they feel is stupid or should have otherwise have known better, for it puts on display their poor training. Also whenever a higher-up does something retarded or just plain wrong, they don't want THEIR bosses to read about it.

What you do off of company hours is however none of anyone's business except your own. This includes whether you like to go to bars, walk around the mall or post on an internet site. That being said, if you come across a situation such as a manager refusing to hire someone because of their race, it would be in poor taste to state the person's name and where they work. Just use common sense. It's like Wolff said, your superiors SHOULD BE HAPPY that you care enough about your job to spend part of your time off learning how to improve your presentations. I would hate to work for anyone that did not appreciate the extra effort.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-10-2005 12:38 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark J. Marshall
I know some folks get their feathers ruffled when I post here, but I've never been told not to either.
I fully agree here, plus what Brad has posted.

Being around the film world a good few years has made me somewhat well known in a few states, and sometimes gained "notorious" status in what I do and what I have done.

Then with my newly introduced presense here on FT, this catagory of being "notorious" has been magnified some since now I'm being watch by my followers and peers, present and former, domestic and worldwide.

I've worked with many large circuits, some have pulled out of the cities that I've worked in, some have gone out of business all together and some have merged with other circuits. In almost all cases with these changes has caused within me, good and bad attitudes about the changes.

Sometimes, when we get "too good" in our trade, we get pretty well set on how things are supposed to run - kind of a King and his Kingdom....the EMPIRE that we have created.

But when the company that we work for decides to make a major change, mainly by mergers decides on different operational conditions, good or bad, we DO get our feathers fluffed real bad.

When we do get our feathers fluffed, keep our comments to ourselves and don't "bitch and whine" about your shortcomings from present and former employers here on FT, for this site has gained somewhat worldwide attention and the large circuits are also watching this site as well.

If you're going to gripe and complain about things, use the email section, so the comments can be kept private and not be publicially announced.

I present this for I've done the same: griped on my past work experiences with a circuit that I worked for, here on FT. And eventually heard that my comments weren't appreciated, thus accidently "burn my bridge" so to say, which I wasn't planning on. Thus, now I keep comments to myself on how circuits operate after this "waking up" that I experienced.

Never worked for AMC ....

Just think, if Brad didn't invent FG, where would we be then?

thx-monte

 |  IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 03-10-2005 06:02 AM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At my favorite theate chain, booth personnel were required to screen prints...especially is it was a major release. Screening prints was done of the employees off-time. The company considered the privledge of being able to privatly screen a film after-hours was payment enough.

Cheers

K

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Fuentes
Mmmm, Dr. Pepper!

Posts: 1168
From: Corpus Christi, TX United States
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 03-10-2005 10:52 AM      Profile for Jeremy Fuentes   Email Jeremy Fuentes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Will Kutler was the last to post
required
quote: Will Kutler
privledge
Doesnt make much sense to me...

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-10-2005 11:49 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Will Kutler
The company considered the privledge of being able to privatly screen a film after-hours was payment enough
It would be interesting to see the employer make that argument in front of a judge. There is NO WAY IN HELL that would stand up legally. A company cannot require, or pressure, hourly employees to do ANY work, including screening new prints, off-the-clock. "Screen the prints on your own time or we might have to fire your ass, because someone else will want your job bad enough that they'll work off-the-clock." I don't think so. That's total BS.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-10-2005 02:24 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David Stambaugh
"Screen the prints on your own time or we might have to fire your ass, because someone else will want your job bad enough that they'll work off-the-clock."
Yep. Total BS!

..I always tell employess of the circuit that used to I work for, that if EVER they set foot into the theatre to do anything related to the theatre, to make sure that they sign in. These employees use to come in on their own time to help out on stuff if that theatre was short handed or another.

..don't give the company ANY of your free time!

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 03-10-2005 04:39 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Yep. Total BS!
Yep. Will is full of shit. That is not a policy at that circuit.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-10-2005 04:48 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If an off-the-clock screening policy is something dreamed up by a local hotshot manager, that person is putting the company at risk of being sued. The corporate office should formally and sternly warn local managers NOT to be doing anything like that.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.