Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » We got rid of our Burn out projectionist (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: We got rid of our Burn out projectionist
Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 07-21-2005 09:02 PM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A long time ago....

We had some gang-bangers (watchin a gang-banger flic) light up some joints in a 20-plex where I was a projectionist. The stench (I cannot stand the smell of weed) was sooo dense that it actually drifted out of the auditorium and into the lobby! Of course there were customer complaints.

Anyhow, the police were called and responded. While the reefer ashes were at their feet, and they were obviously stoned, the police failed to arrest them because they were not physically holding the evidence.

These gang-bangers also harrassed some female customers that complained about them, as well as some female theatre employees. And this failed to get any action from the cops.

Despite the fact that they were escorted from the premisis, they did loom around the theatre past closing, intimidating both customers and theatre employees.

Thanks for your WONDERFUL HELP...TPD!

K.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Ziegler
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 753
From: West Hollywood, CA
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 07-22-2005 05:44 PM      Profile for Jim Ziegler   Email Jim Ziegler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sounds like some lazy officers. Even if they couldn't make the pot charge stick (which they could have), sure AZ has a law against public intoxication or disorderly conduct.

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Dallas
Film Handler

Posts: 48
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
Registered: Jul 2004


 - posted 08-05-2005 07:16 AM      Profile for Alan Dallas   Email Alan Dallas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Public intoxication is the appearance of a person who is under the influence of drugs or alcohol in a place open to the general public. In most American jurisdictions, public intoxication is considered a misdemeanor.

However... Arizona state law has no public intoxication laws and does not permit any city police to remove intoxicated individuals from the streets or public places, intoxicated individuals must commit a crime before they can be arrested. In Will's case above the "Evidence" for a Possesion arrest got smoked up. May have been a case for "Igniting a flamable matertial inside an enclosed space" however. But thats stretching it even with witnesses.

There is one thing your Theatre can do in AZ state though. You can have the Police remove and detain an individual(s) for "Trespassing". A Trespasser is anyone you do not want to have access to your property. You can press charges for Trespassing easily in AZ. May need to check with your local Police dept. how they handle Trespassing cases but if its like in my neck of the woods here in AZ when we ask a disruptive customer to leave(complete with a Re-admit Pass) we also get their name and a description and we inform them to please not return for that day or the Police will be contacted and Trespassing charges will be brought forth.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Ziegler
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 753
From: West Hollywood, CA
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 08-05-2005 06:29 PM      Profile for Jim Ziegler   Email Jim Ziegler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In most states they could probably also be cited for violations of fire codes prohibiting smoking in auditoriums...

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-05-2005 06:31 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jim Ziegler
Sounds like some lazy officers. Even if they couldn't make the pot charge stick (which they could have), sure AZ has a law against public intoxication or disorderly conduct.
Geez Jim just think about it. If they arrested the guys, then where would they get their weed from??? [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-05-2005 06:49 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Phil Hill
But Mike, there's no proof it was him.
If someone is habitually smoking pot on the job it would be pretty easy to get the proof. Getting it on video would be pretty easy. You don't have to try to hide some MiniDV camcorder with the play button pressed. Just set up a little WiFi video camera with its own built in wireless 802.11g server. Plug it in anywhere on site. Aim it remotely. And catch the on-the-job stoner in the act. Those little cameras actually scare me a bit. They could really unleash the "big brother is watching you" spectre a great deal.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 08-05-2005 08:34 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry Bobby, but I think you're smoking some of that I-30 stuff yourself. WITHOUT a sworn peace officer there (even "undercover"), live, in person, the camera would only show that there was *something* there/smoked/etc. It would be the doper's word against yours as to what it was... MJ or oregano. And a "Citizen's Arrest" would open you up to an expensive court battle and possibly a lawsuit.

Also, if YOU tried to collect the "evidence," YOU are the one going to get busted for possession.

My prior suggestion IS the BEST course of action... Adam will help. [beer] [Big Grin] [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-05-2005 08:55 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The police are almost completely useless to society, as are druggies. Best to take matters into your own hands. Eliminate (permanantly) the stoners. The world has no use for their presence, and they will be missed by nobody, guaranteed.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-06-2005 12:21 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Phil Hill
Sorry Bobby, but I think you're smoking some of that I-30 stuff yourself. WITHOUT a sworn peace officer there (even "undercover"), live, in person, the camera would only show that there was *something* there/smoked/etc.
Given the way said stoner was described in his practices, catching him in the act probably would have been very easy. People are creatures of habit. The manager or whoever could record video of the stoner doing his thing, show it to the cops and at least raise their suspicions and then conduct a sting on the dude. Normal people take a coffee break at a particular time. This guy smokes pot like clockwork. Just have a black and white come by, watch the life Wi-Fi feed of the dude toking it up and then go in and bust his ass for being so stoopid.

I, too, have nothing against someone who wants to smoke marijuana on their own time. It's not proven to be addictive or nearly as harmful as legal cigarettes. It also doesn't deserve to be put in the same class as other dangerous "hard" drugs like methamphetamine or cocaine. Still, it impairs your functions like crazy, thus it shouldn't be acceptable for anyone to be high on the job. It is at least very similar to someone getting drunk on the job. If someone shows up at my workplace drunk or gets drunk on the clock they get fired immediately. That's probably what should have happened to this guy at the very least.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.