Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Bubble: the new Steve Soderbergh film theatrical and DVD release (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Bubble: the new Steve Soderbergh film theatrical and DVD release
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-29-2006 06:19 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Darryl Spicer
There is just no guarantee that the DVD you get from a rental store is going to play correctly. When you bring it home and it is scratched or has finger prints all over it, it will not play correctly.
That is the truly irritating thing about renting DVDs. So many in the general public are disgusting, uncaring pigs when it comes to handling DVDs. They need the taste slapped out of their mouths for their inconsiderate behavior.

Naturally, no such justice will happen. I'm just surprised the video stores don't have some kind of accountability applied to customers who ruin discs. Back in the 1980s I remember some video stores actually checking the condition of returned tapes and billing for damages. Today, uncaring renters ruin discs with impunity. Like I said, they need a smack.

OTOH, some video stores have really stupid methods of packaging their movies, thus damaging the movies through their own volition.

Our local Hastings Music Books and Video has by far the best selection of DVDs to rent. However, some complete irredeemable fucktards in the company to this day still insist on only using plastic single disc jewel case sized containers to hold all releases. 2 disc release? They always cram both discs into the single disc case, expecting them both to stay put on that tiny spindle. They ruin the discs almost immediately. After a single week's worth of rentals you will find all copies of a 2 disc movie with one disc secured on the spindle and the other one loose in the container. I have written Hastings about this numerous times and they have never responded back or changed their packaging. Fucktards, I say! Fucktards!
[Mad]

So, whenever a 2-disc DVD is released that I want to rent, I usually have to visit Hollywood Video or Blockbuster and then hope there is a widescreen copy available. 95% of what they put on their shelves is idiotic fool-screen versions.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-29-2006 09:33 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Back on topic: From boxofficeguru.com:

Steven Soderbergh's Bubble, which opened in theaters and debuted on the HDnet cable channel this weekend, posted a soft opening with an estimated $72,000 from 32 theaters for a mild $2,250 average.

 |  IP: Logged

Jon Morgan
Film Handler

Posts: 60
From: Raleigh, NC
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 01-30-2006 04:13 PM      Profile for Jon Morgan   Email Jon Morgan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Paul Linfesty
I think I read it's also only being projected digitally in the few theatres (mostly Landmark) that are showing it.
Magnolia is definitely distributing 35mm prints of this film. I hate the release strategy, and I hate Mark Cuban in general, but I liked the film. It did all right for our theater's standards. Certainly better than plenty of the smaller independent features.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-30-2006 05:29 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From MovieMarshall.com...
>>On the indie circuits were: Steven Soderberg's weird 'Bubble' bombed with $72,000 earning a puny $2,250 in 32 locations.<<

So much for that experiment...

It was a nothing film that needed a gimmick like this to let it make ANYTHING at all. It was even on the news here about how it was going to change the way films are released. Well, one independent movie doing a stupid release like this won't make me stay up nights. You want to impress me? Release something big like this...say Star Wars 7 and I'll take notice. In the meantime...they're going to be flat out making back their $2million production budget.

Disney execs...please take note of this failure.

John

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 01-31-2006 01:32 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's on sale for $22.99 at BestBuy. [beer]

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-01-2006 05:05 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well here's a telling tidbit....there are a bunch of pirates who sell their bootleg ware on the corner of Flatbush and Nostrand Avenues in Brooklyn. They have almost ever current title that are in theatres. I once called the cops to ask them what's being done about that kind of thing. The sergeant who answered the phone was very polite, but he said that kind of thing was handled by a special unit that worked in conjunction with the FBI and they don't do anything unless the FBI directs them. I didn't press it -- his tone had an unspoken statement (hear between the vowels) that said: "Are you kiddin, Bub? Our guys are out their fighting muggers and rapists." Anyway, that's not the point, the point is, I went over to this bootleg guy's array of first run DVDs all sprawled out on the sidewalk along with CDs as well and I looked for BUBBLE (not in 3D) and didn't see it. I figured, surely THIS title would be right there seeing as how it wouldn't even take the time to get a camcorder into a theatre to record it -- all they needed to go was buy it and make as many perfect copies as they needed and with no audience noise like the rest of their bootleg copies (which this guy claims is a PL:US -- his DVD give you the "audience experience, just like you're in the theatre). So I asked him "Do you have BUBBLE." His answer was, "What?" "BUBBLE," says I. "Never heard of it," he replies.

So much for where this Soderbergh "experiment" is going. I have a friend who works for TLA a DVD retailer. In a week or two I'll find out what kind of sales it's doing.

Has anyone seen ANY advertising campaign on this thing?

Below is an imaginary telephone conversation I had yesterday when I saw the ad that TLA bulk emailed to me:

In theatres 4 days ago. On DVD today.
Own Steven Soderbergh's Bubble
for just $19.99 at TLA Video!

BTW, It's only playing on ONE screen at that Landmark and nowhere in Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island or Bronx, which are all more populated parts of New York City than Manhattan. Not exactly "at a theatre near you" (well, not near me, at any rate).

Imaginary phone call:

Hello, Landmark? Can I speak to the Manager please? pause

Hello, are you the manager?

Can I reserve the theatre for a showing of BUBBLE?

I can?

Good, we will have about 100 patrons coming. We are willing to pay full ticket price, it's just I want to be sure we will have that many seats available in one theatre.

No problem? Oh excellent.

This Thursday for the 8pm show. I'll come buy with cash to purchase tickets in advance if that's ok. I want to avoid having everyone needing to pay at the door.

Wow, really? Free small popcorns for each in the party?

Thank you; that's very nice of you.

Sure, I would be glad to write a letter of commendation to your home office about our experience after the film.

Goodbye.


10 minutes later:

Hello....you are the gentleman who I just spoke to about the party of 100 for a screening of BUBBLE?

Hello again. Listen, I feel really bad about this, but we are going to have to cancel that party of 100 for BUBBLE

That's right.

Well, you see, BUBBLE is already out on DVD and our film club has our own new DLP projector -- isn't that just like the DLP projectors that they use in the theatres now?

Not the same?

Well anyway, we never go to the theatre to see a film that is already out on DVD. We just show it at Gena's finished basement....with the projector on a big screen. It actually is better than in the theatre....it's digital you know.

Perhaps you should write to you home office and ask them why they would play a movie that is already out on DVD.

Oh, I AM sorry, you sound depressed. If you like, I can still write to them to tell them what a very nice phone manner you have.

Well, thanks for your help. Goodbye...Oh wait, do you think we can come buy and pick up those free popcorns you offered?

Hello?


Of course I would never do this to a fellow theatre operator, tempting as it is. And just in case any of you are wondering about the quality of this Soderbergh "film," I give you:

REVIEW
A short-film idea interminably stretched to (barely) feature length, Bubble is a half-assed "experiment" from director Soderbergh that fails in both ambition and execution. It tells the story of workers in a small-town doll factory on the West Virginia border, specifically handsome Kyle (Ashley) and dowdy middle-aged Martha (Doebereiner), who have formed a special bond of friendship. When sexy young jailbait Rose (Wilkins) joins the staff, a love triangle of sorts rears its head, and is the possible cause of an ensuing murder. All this, including the police procedural that follows, is filmed flatly...and acted that way as well by the non-professional cast. The end result is a lot like Full Frontal without the starpower. Soderbergh makes the additional mistake of underdirecting his non-actors, who recite the bland, improvised dialogue with even less impact than one would expect. Bubble was somewhat heralded as the first film (albeit shot on video) to be released in theatres and on DVD simultaneously; it will be forgotten just as quickly.
-- David Gorgos

To be perfectly honest, this sounds EXACTLY like the kind of "film" that they release DIRECTLY to DVD without any theatrical release. They have been doing this rip-off for years, even back in the days of VHS....you would see them on the rental store shelves and wonder what the hell is THAT title. They put more money into the graphics on the box than into the film. That was the trick....make the box so eye-catching and with such exciting plot summary text, in other words make it so much a look-alike as a REAL film that someone is a liable to pick it up and buy or rent it thinking it WAS a real movie that they must have somehow missed when it came around the theatres. Clever these charlatans; not much difference between them and the street corner bootleggers....both selling junk disguised to look like the real thing.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 02-01-2006 07:25 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To be fair, Gorgos' review is oversimplified. The film's plot is very much rooted in those bad direct-to-video genre cliches, but the other elements, such as acting, sound design, and photography, go completely in the other direction, creating this huge contrast between the two. It has a very complex structure with many many layers. It's also unfair to say that the concept is half-assed. This format is something that Soderbergh's been playing with here and there since TRAFFIC. The other five films that he's releasing under this deal will all be made in a similar fashion, with local non-actors, available light, etc.. That's a pretty big commitment to something so experimental, especially when he could be doing something "safe" like OCEAN'S THIRTEEN.

I'm not saying that most people will like the movie, and I totally understand why they wouldn't. But I don't think it can be dismissed as something that was just thrown out there to make a quick buck.

Jon, how did it look on 35mm?

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 02-01-2006 09:01 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We don't need an Ocean's 13. We really didn't need 12.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 02-01-2006 10:13 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My point exactly. Why should we have to see the same old crap when we could be seeing entirely new crap? That being said, OCEAN'S TWELVE rocks, and I'll be the first in line (at the theater!) to see OCEAN'S THIRTEEN.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 02-02-2006 12:19 PM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
this sounds EXACTLY like the kind of "film" that they release DIRECTLY to DVD without any theatrical release.
And now, its not even an afterthought to most people. Plenty of regular folks probably saw CNN report on the release last week, but where's the follow-up?

What Dixar has to figure out is what really drives their releases & if a split release could possibly muster the audience that the anticipation of seeing the film in a good theatre could do. They might be able to get away with co-releasing the animated tripe not being produced by their Pixar component, Bambi 2, etc. But it seems that Pixar's style is more like the exhibitor-friendly Disney fare of their early days, and craves a big screen to thrive in numbers posted in recent years.

Yeah, Bubble goes down, but with WB focused on IMAX co-releases, Ocean's 13 shouldn't even factor in. Remember Erin Brokovich & cyan tracks?

 |  IP: Logged

Alex Grueneberg
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 125
From: Chicago, IL
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 02-05-2006 10:55 AM      Profile for Alex Grueneberg   Author's Homepage   Email Alex Grueneberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Landmark's Century Center here in Chicago is screening a 35MM version. I thought something just didn't look right about the scope presentation. Typical..

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 02-05-2006 07:25 PM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Landmark's lens inventory isn't good in Minneapolis either. Nor their masking or screen quality. The Cineplex Odeon-built Edina Theatre (now Landmark-run) is better.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-07-2006 08:23 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From REBoaz over on Exhibitors_Screening_Room forum:

I just saw "Bubble"'s weekend actuals on
Boxofficemojo.com.

Position this weekend (Feb. 3-5) - 56
Position last weekend (Jan. 27-29) - 46
Weekend box Office - $26,884
Percentage decrease - -62.0%
Number of theatres - 23
Net loss of theatres - -9
Average gross per theatre - $1,168
Total box office - $127,888
Estimated production budget - $1.60 million
Weeks in release - 2

Lost 62% of its business. Lost 9 screens in its
company's own theatres. Grossed a whopping $1,168 per screen/theatre. Looks like a winner to me! I think
I'll open our season with it ... NOT!!!

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 02-07-2006 09:51 AM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess the lingering question is, How much did the DVD sales take in?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.