|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Hiring Decision Etiquette (SP?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 03-12-2008 07:21 PM
quote: Scott Norwood So Regal is taking applications when there is no hope that anyone who applies will be offered a job? How is that ethical? Doesn't that policy just waste everyone's time?
In many places, you are required to accept applications. It is part of the Equal Employment Opportunity Employer stuff. You are not required to offer an interview, but you do need to have and accept the aps. It basically keeps an employer from handing an ap to the white guy and not the woman or minority. Of course, the minority never gets the interview, but hey, it looks good on paper. Although there was that lawsuit against Hooters a few years back brought by the guy who couldn't get hired as a server.
It also may be, and I'm not sure on this one, that you are required to keep applications on file for 1 year. That may be a state by state thing too, I can't remember.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|