|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Movie presentation is awful in and around Denver, CO
|
|
|
|
|
Geoff Jones
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 579
From: Broomfield, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2006
|
posted 08-14-2009 11:31 PM
I saw District 9 on the Giant Screen at the Continental tonight at 7pm. The 35mm presentation was sharp, focused, bright and decently framed. Audio was excellent.
After several visits, I have to agree that the stadium retrofit made seating and sight angles less comfortable than before.
The really bad news: According to staff, the Flasthback series won't be returning to the Continental. Instead, it'll be at the new Regal River Point STADIUM 14.
Reportedly, the manager who was responsible for the series moved to that theatre, and took it with him. Regal thinks it will bring more attention to their new cinema, and that Denver isn't big enough for two Flashback Series.
I would think they could save a fair amount on shipping costs by sharing it between cinemas (Tuesday night at one and Wednesday at another), and I'm fairly confident they wouldn't cannibalize on each other's ticket sales because Regal does such a piss-poor job of advertising the series.
The only films I've seen in the theatre in 2009 that I would pay to see again were part of that Flashback Series. It sucks that they won't be on the Giant Screen any more.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99
|
posted 08-25-2009 03:12 AM
Wow, the Regal Riverpoint 14 in Sheridan, CO is full of incompetence. They scratch prints left and right. Their audio is always very painful, even after asking them to turn it down (assuming they actually do it). Tons of lab splices in their prints (counted 6 in Inglourious Basterds). The employees of this theater seemingly cannot handle running a movie theater properly.
They scratched more prints of Harry Potter than can be counted, constantly scratching their replacement prints as well and even building them up "backwards" causing many refunds to be issued until it could be fixed. How embarrassing for them.
Tonight, two minutes after the advertised start time of the show I watched, the masking comes down for scope, but the movie doesn't start. I turn around and watch the button pusher (can't call them "projectionists", for sure) is bumbling around with the projector. He was rethreading it for whatever reason. A few minutes later he restarts it and of course it is out of frame. The audio was ear-bleeding and naturally the print was scratched (though on this one it was only the last hour or so that was scratched).
What is even more embarrassing about this location is that the district offices are in the building. You think that would make them want to put on a better show just in case, you know, the DM happens to be around. And I imagine that he always is. Maybe he doesn't care about doing the job right, either. The theater manager sure doesn't seem to. The button pushers definitely don't. I get so frustrated when I see movies at this theater because of the shitty job that they do. It is embarrassing for them to be outclassed by a crappy old mall theater built in 1977 (and sometimes substantially outgrossed on like titles, too).
Do not visit the Regal Riverpoint 14. Go elsewhere (you don't have many good choices around this town) or wait for the DVD. They do not want your business or otherwise they would put on a better show! They really, honestly do not care here.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geoff Jones
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 579
From: Broomfield, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2006
|
posted 08-30-2009 02:50 PM
Saw Inglourious Basterds at the Westminster Promenade at 6:50 in #20.
Screen was decent sized, but not huge. It was constant height, and nice to see the masking open up on the sides at the end of the pre-show crap
We sat in the lower, front section, and the slope/ sight lines were inadequate. The person in the row in front of us blocked our view.
35mm presentation was remarkably stable, as noted in the IB thread. However, the bottom 8th or so of the screen was quite dim (right around where the subtitles were). It was very obvious in the end credits, when the text scrolled up and became brighter.
Otherwise, projection and sound were very satisfactory.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|