Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » 3-D headed in the wrong direction (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: 3-D headed in the wrong direction
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-23-2009 08:32 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh I don't think that's the problem since my eyes stopped hurting right after the movie was over.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael McGovern
Film Handler

Posts: 57
From: New Britain, CT, USA
Registered: May 2008


 - posted 09-23-2009 09:13 PM      Profile for Michael McGovern     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As far as I war aware, the expense for the 3-D glasses is being paid for by the film studios distributing the 3-D films. The extra cost for 3-D covers licensing fees charged by Reel-D for using their technology, along with additional costs for the technology.

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 09-23-2009 10:40 PM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Michael McGovern
As far as I war aware, the expense for the 3-D glasses is being paid for by the film studios distributing the 3-D films.
Although it is said the studios are paying for the glasses, in reality I can assure you that they are working the cost into the film rental percentage. So the theaters are not paying a separate line item for glasses but they are indirectly paying for them.

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Castle
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 220
From: Wollongong University, NSW ,Australia
Registered: Oct 2003


 - posted 09-24-2009 12:52 AM      Profile for Peter Castle   Email Peter Castle   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And those not using polarised glasses have already paid the cost of the glasses, and would like to use any surcharge to recover that cost - which is NOT provided by the distributor. But the distributor still wants their percentage of that surcharge.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 09-24-2009 06:10 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Michael McGovern
The extra cost for 3-D covers licensing fees charged by Reel-D for using their technology, along with additional costs for the technology.
What? No additional profit for the exhibitor??? [Eek!]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.