|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: ADA service dogs
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 04-03-2018 11:23 AM
My girlfriend is allergic to dogs, cats and other animals.
She is so allergic to horses that, if she touches a horse, she will break out in hives. One time, when she was a kid, she went horseback riding and her legs broke out so badly that she couldn’t walk, even though she was wearing jeans.
Worse, she has asthma which can be aggravated by animal dander.
She often hesitates to visit my parents house because they have a dog. (A Brittany Spaniel.) Even when we do visit, we have to make sure she has her asthma inhaler In case of breathing trouble.
Strangely, we have a cat that she isn’t allergic to but only THIS cat. Somehow, she has acclimated to our cat, “Casper,” which is a white, American Shorthair. If she is exposed to another cat she may or may not have an allergic reaction.
Bottom line: You never know what kinds of animals a person might be allergic to and you can’t always tell until a person is actually exposed to a particular animal.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rick Raskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1100
From: Manassas Virginia
Registered: Jan 2003
|
posted 04-03-2018 02:40 PM
I think this portion of the Q&A applies:
When can service animals be excluded?
A. The ADA does not require covered entities to modify policies, practices, or procedures if it would “fundamentally alter” the nature of the goods, services, programs, or activities provided to the public. Nor does it overrule legitimate safety requirements. If admitting service animals would fundamentally alter the nature of a service or program, service animals may be prohibited. In addition, if a particular service animal is out of control and the handler does not take effective action to control it, or if it is not housebroken, that animal may be excluded.
At issue would be the definition of "fundamentally alter". A dog blocking an aisle could be addressed under "legitimate safety".
In short, I think the law does give you some latitude.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|