Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Ads Mixed in With Trailers (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Ads Mixed in With Trailers
Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 10-04-2019 10:41 PM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm surprised, but pleased that AMC is not doing this (yet).

AMC, the largest chain, doesn't break out advertising separately in their revenue reports, but they categorize Admissions, Food & Beverages, and Other, with advertising obviously being part of Other. In the first two quarters of this year, Other constituted $218.2 million, which was 8.06% of revenue. Let's assume that advertising was 90% of Other. That makes it 7.25% of revenue. There has to be some sales and production costs against that revenue, but let's say it's very high margin at 80%. That makes the net 5.8% of gross revenue.

Is it really worth alienating the audience for 5.8% of gross revenue? Wouldn't it be better to get a few percent more people in the theaters or to get per caps up?

I think I know why this is happening. I bet the advertisers are discovering that their ads are having no impact, so the idea is to stick them between the trailers so people will watch.

Instead of these dumb ads that no one really pays any attention to, I'd love to see sponsored short films instead. The sponsor can have a big logo screen beginning and end of each one. And they can put some advertising screens in the bathrooms and in the lobby near the concession stand. They can get their impressions that way, although I'd prefer to see no such advertising in theaters, except perhaps for some limited tie-ins. Theaters used to be so much classier when I was a kid.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 10-05-2019 01:25 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think that assuming that advertising is 90% of other is a very high estimate. As big as they are, they'll probably do a bunch of sub-leasing, which will also find its way into "Other".

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-05-2019 05:25 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Martin's idea is sound. If you MUST advertise, then put something on the screen that is cinematic and worth seeing instead of ads, and then slap your company name on it. For example, how about all those short subjects that are nominated for academy awards every year that NOBODY gets to see..sponsor one of them with your logo at the beginning and end. That will be much more impressive than a TV commercial.

Every film school every year has an output of thesis films that again, no one gets to see; quite a few of them are incredibly entertaining, thought-provoking and very worthy of an audience -- sponsor one of them with your name/logo. It will be appreciated by an audience waiting for the feature to start much more so than a tv commercial and it will be very helpful to that young filmmaker. And theatres could dig out those old snipes that said Plus Selected Short Subjects that we all enjoyed watching before the feature.

All of the above to basically say, "Hey, Mr. Marketing Excutive Arsehole, tv commercials on theatre screens DON'T WORK. If anything, they produce negative impact, exactly what you don't want. So wake up and STOP IT."

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 10-06-2019 09:38 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What a god awful idea. When will the garbage end?!

quote: Frank Cox
20 minutes? Sheesh. I usually play zero, one or two, and very occasionally three trailers but more than that seems to be getting past reasonable.
Yeeeep. Example- our(at a Regal theater) two copies of Joker have 18:48 and 21:43 worth of trailers on them. So your 9:40 show won't hit feature til after 10. Enjoy!

Shit drives me crazy!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.