|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Is It Really True About...
|
Jerry Chase
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1068
From: Margate, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 12-28-2000 08:44 AM
Brad, I don't know if it a record for a paying audience or not. It was fun. One of the better union projectionists and I did it together, because the selsyns were set to join three projectors, and another set were joining two. We had to use an accumulator between the two sets.Needless to say, the print was gone over with a fine tooth comb before threading, and we used a lo-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-ng leader. If the other two films hadn't been doing business, I might have considered adding them in as well, although we did have a few empty seats in one of the auditoriums. I did get a real chuckle from one audience member. This theatre was known for a problem with customers crossing over, so, practical joker that I am, I told the manager and staff not to be too concerned that night. One kid in particular was memorable. He came out of Batman on the end auditorium, gave a furtive look around and snuck down the hall into ... Batman ... confused, he went to the next auditorium and snuck into ... Batman ... Now really confused, he walked down the hall and peeked into the next door and saw ... Batman. He then walked across the hall to where one of the other films was scheduled, but found the auditorium empty because it was between shows. He then bounced back across the hall to another auditorium showing ... Batman. At that point, he walked out the back exit, swearing to himself. And people have to ask why we like this business...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 12-28-2000 01:47 PM
Since the theatre work that I've done has been essentially a hobby, and since I've spent most of my time in the booth running reel-to-reel setups in single-screen theatres, I haven't had much chance to do interlocks. Last summer, I did a few two-screen interlock shows and at least one for three screens. I would have enjoyed doing more than three, but it was kind of hard to justify this sort of thing with all the crappy movies that were released over the summer. At the 10-plex, it was "theoretically" possible to interlock all ten screens, although I don't think anyone has ever actually done this. I've heard of a few four-screen interlock shows, though.
I enjoyed interlocks, although I was probably lucky in that I never had any problems with them. If I'd had a drive belt break (Cinemeccanicas) or bulb blow, I would probably feel differently.
Are there any automation systems that allow the use of start timers for interlocking? It's probably not a very good idea anyway, but it would be nice to have the option, at least...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erik Schill
Film Handler
Posts: 38
From: Rochester, NY, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 12-29-2000 01:46 PM
just a silly question while you guys are talking about interlocking, the theatre I work at has 12 theatres, and 5 different booths, we have one that has 6 in it, 3 on one side, 3 on the otherside, I can't even see a possability for interlocking, cause we have heat ducts and crap between projectors in that booth, we have 2 booths that have that have 2 in them, how ever in one of them there is a make up area between them, so again no way, and in the other one the projectors are like 100+ feet apart, and again heat ducts, and a roof hatch in the way, then we have 2 booths with just one in each, now my question, the only other projection booth I have ever been in is the one at our old theatre, which is now trashed, is this lay out really really really stupid and gay, cause I sure as hell think so, it's a pain to move prints, and it's almost imposable to keep your eyes on all the prints at the same time, and that's why we have so many film crashes
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerry Chase
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1068
From: Margate, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 12-29-2000 07:15 PM
Movies the first place to get news? I think not. Radio and newspapers held that slot. However, movie newsreels were the first place where people saw fluff news. I'll agree that there wasn't the amount of entertainment available back then, but people didn't have much time for entertainment either. Dances, church activities, local sports, and school functions all vied for the entertainment dollar and limited time available. I agree about video sales being predicated on success at the boxoffice, and am thankful. Without that, the pressure to cut theatres out of the loop would be mounting. At various times, distribution direct to cable, ppv, or tape have been tried. Each attempt was a rousing dud. As I said, I used to think the social experience part was important. With stadium seating placing each viewer into a virtual cocoon, and people loving it, I just can't continue to hold that position. However, If by social experience, you mean getting the wife out of the house, or girlfriend away from parents, then I'll go along with that definition.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|