|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Windows XP problems
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 04-10-2002 12:37 AM
Steve, I just discovered something else. Windows ME started running slower than hell in my 733mhz with over 300 megs of RAM. It started that when the CPU blower started to go south. Maybe that was just a coincidence. Anyway, I switched boot up drives, (a 40 gig drive) and re-loaded ME and all the other programs I need, minus a few funky ones I don't need. I think I might have made an error. I copied an entire directory about 2 gigs worth of pictures, MOV's, AVI's, etc. to the boot drive. Then, I made a new directory, and eliminated all the duplicate stuff from the 2 gig directory. The new directory turns out to be about 1.3 gigs. Then, I deleted the entire 2 gig directory, and copied a 10 gig directory of wav files, and a 800 meg directory of MP3 files from the old boot drive. When I finished, the machine seems to run very nicely, boots up fast, etc. So, I decided to defrag the drive. I started to defrag it about 6 hours ago, and it is still munching on it. If I watch it, it will go through its sequence, then after shoveling crap around, it quits.....like it is talking to itself and saying, "This shit won't fit" and starts over again. It has been doing that since I started the defrag program, and it has finally reached the 79% complete mark. I would suspect it will want to munch on it for another two hours or more before it is finished. I think I stuffed too much data down its throat. I wonder if it will work when it is finished defragging. 
| IP: Logged
|
|
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 04-10-2002 12:21 PM
Paul, Defragging can take a LONG time, depending on the drive's performance, etc. Let it finish.ME vs. 2000 vs. XP: As someone else said, Windows 2000 Professional with Service Pack 2 is amazingly stable. When I was working at Dynamix (game developer), all our programmers and artists ran on Win2K and I can count the number of blue-screen crashes on the thumb of one hand (and that turned out to be a Novell client driver issue, not a Windows issue). I'm running XP Home Version on this PC, and so far it has been perfectly stable for me as well. Macintoshes: I confess I am Windows through and through. But my Dad bought himself an iMac when they first came out. It was his first computer, so he had no experience with it at all. I went over to his place and helped him get it going. I supported a half-dozen or so Macs at Dynamix, so I was not unfamiliar with the OS. Well, helping him get acclimated to that machine reinforced my belief that the Mac OS is NOWHERE NEAR as intuitive as current implementations of Windows. I could not for the life of me figure out how to do simple tasks like cutting and pasting text from one app to another. That's just one example too. There were other things. Try configuring network settings for example. I could almost never find any help in the help system either. It was a very frustrating experience. Yes, I'm corrupted by Windows, but damn it, don't tell me how easy and intuitive the Mac OS environment is because you're talking to deaf ears. You Mac users are just as guilty of being brainwashed as us Windows users. 
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 04-10-2002 02:07 PM
Paul, yes, 9 hours seems long, maybe too long. Must have had a whole lot of very small files or something, I don't know.More about Macintoshes: Mac users brag about the stability of their systems compared to Windows. Give me a break! Those early iMacs should never have gone into production. They were notoriously unstable. Steve Jobs' "Cube" system was plagued by overheating problems. My Dad's iMac still, to this day, freezes up on him several times a week, and all he does with it is web surfing and occasionally printing stuff out. That's it! He isn't running multiple applications or doing anything exotic. The hardware has been swapped, the firmware is up to date, yadda yadda, but it still likes to lock up. Apple support kept insisting "Oh, you just need more RAM, or the latest OS patch, the problem is your printer, blah bhal". The Macs we ran at Dynamix were no more reliable than WinTel systems. It makes no difference if the problem is in the hardware or the software, to the user it's an unstable work platform.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 04-10-2002 09:01 PM
Dave and Steven, I never thought about shutting down all the programs running in the background. There was probably a bunch of them. Next time I defrag, I'll do just that.Thanks for the info.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 04-11-2002 12:08 PM
Back in those days, we did almost all of the music and sound effects in-house. Ken Rogers probably did the sounds effects (no, not Kenny Rogers). We had a couple full-time professional musicians composing and performing the music. Also a full-time photographer (I mean photographs, not videos). For games like Aces of the Pacific, Red Baron, etc. we had a full-time historian! For AotP, they sent a group to Japan to interview surviving Japanese pilots (on video). This stuff was fascinating and of historical importance. Wonder what happened to all that footage.Later, after the big bad new corporate owners came along, they decided all this stuff could be outsourced, so they let all the sound & music people go. But we did keep a video production department, headed by a guy named Jim Carey (no, not THAT Jim Carrey). That video group did some amazing work. Dynamix video stuff was the envy of the rest of the company. That group is still working for the new owner (Vivendi Universal) in Bellevue. Sorry, probably more than you wanted to know.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|