Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Bradford Cinerama. (questions to Dick Vaughan) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Bradford Cinerama. (questions to Dick Vaughan)
Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 09-07-2002 05:24 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would like to add my thanks as well, and it was good to be able to meet Leo and Darren as well, the first uk members of these forums that I have met.

I have only been home for about 45 minutes, but I'm too tired to do anything but sleep at the moment; I will make another post tomorrow.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 09-09-2002 02:18 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here here... many thanks for an excellent show and to Tony for the box tours.

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-09-2002 03:03 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The impression I got of this was that in US & Canadian English, 'theater' meant live stage shows and 'theatre' meant film exhibition

I promise you, in the US the live theater people insist that 'theatre' is live & 'theater' is movies, & at the same time the film people insist that 'theatre' is movies & 'theater' is plays, etc.
Both groups also insist that "the other side" agrees to & adheres to whatever convention which they're describing.



 |  IP: Logged

Chris Markiewicz
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 209
From: Glenaviegh, County Tipperary, Ireland
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 09-09-2002 05:35 PM      Profile for Chris Markiewicz   Email Chris Markiewicz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
William,
Working in both live theatre and film exhibition, let me say that you are absolutely right. Both sides are certain that their terminology is correct.
-Chris

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 09-09-2002 06:12 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Has anyone seem a single strip 70mm version of "THIS IS CINERAMA" ? I seem to recall seeing it at the Honolulu Cinerama Theatre many years ago after they stopped showing three strip Cinerama and replaced it with the single strip version. I remember it was not very good despite the fact that the single strip version was in the Super Panavision ratio. Although the Cinerama opened with "THE WONDERFUL WORLD OF THE BROTHERS GRIMM" and than contunued with "HOW THE WEST WAS WON". After the MGM western ended it's Honolulu run, the Cinerama presented all of the three strip versions of the original Cinerama films including "WINDJAMMER" which was photographed in Cinemiracle, a process similar to Cinerama. That was a great show with wonderful visuals and music,

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-09-2002 07:23 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have a few very magenta frames of 70mm TIC here. It appears to be a horrible composite that severely crops the original image. Only about 2/3 of each side panel is visible and I could be wrong but it looks like the middle panel isn't as vertically rectangular as I would expect. If it's true that they didn't reproduce the full height of the 3-panel image then the middle is going to take up more room than it ought to and leave less for the sides. Not that you're ever going to get that wide of a picture into 2.2 : 1.

On the plus side the index holes line up nicely with the framelines!


 |  IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 09-09-2002 10:46 PM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If they did a single strip version of "This is Cinerama", wouldn't it have been in Ultra-Panavision 70 (1.913x.868 x 1.25 squeeze = 2.76:1) and not Super Panavision (1.913 x .868 spherical = 2.2:1)?

In addition, if the print was optically corrected, you'll see more squeeze on the far left and right, which is why those panels might look smaller.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 09-09-2002 11:59 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Martin,

You are absolutely correct. I always get Super Panavision and Ultra Panavision confused. What is even more confusing is the name MGM gave the Ultra Panavision process when the advertised the format as Camera 65 when they released "RAINTREE COUNTY" and "BEN-HUR". The interesting thing about "RAINTREE COUNTY" was it's exhibition in 35mm only because all 70mm theatres were booked playing other films at the time. It sure would have been wonderful if MGM had re released this movie in 70mm when theatres became available.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Dick Vaughan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1032
From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 09-10-2002 02:58 AM      Profile for Dick Vaughan   Author's Homepage   Email Dick Vaughan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Leo / Stephen / Darren

Glad you all enjoyed the show . Thanks for your kind words which I have paseed on to Tony.

Hope you can all make it back soon

Dick


 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Hauerslev
Master Film Handler

Posts: 451
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 09-10-2002 08:50 AM      Profile for Thomas Hauerslev   Author's Homepage   Email Thomas Hauerslev   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was able to run a short piece of "TIC" in 70mm a few years ago. The print was faded, flat and is now garnished with vinegar and un-projectable. One interesting detail is that image stability between panels was much better than 3-strip projection.

Not only were the 3-strips original combined to 65mm, but the speed was reduced from 26 fps to 24 fps. Imagine the re-recording work being done for that!

"Windjammer" was also available in single strip 35mm. The anamorphic print I've seen had all 3 panels clearly visible (Again, inter panel stability was great), and the widescreen version (In IB Tech btw) showed only one panel.

I've got some 70mm frames from HTWWW too, and that print seems to be anamorphic. So, apparently, both Super Panavision and Ultra Panavision type prints were made from 3-strip originals.

3-strip combined to single strip

65mm/70mm split to 3-strip

------------------
---------

Cheers, Thomas
www.in70mm.com
www.dp70.com
www.70mm.dk


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-10-2002 09:22 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The piece of TIC I have does not appear to be squeezed at all. Just severely cropped.

 |  IP: Logged

Bernard Tonks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 11-04-2002 04:17 AM      Profile for Bernard Tonks   Email Bernard Tonks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dick,

A fantastic Sunday at Bradford, thoroughly enjoyed. Tony and Duncan gave a wonderful tour of the Pictureville and Imax. It was really kind of Tony to give so much of his time and expertise, with his wealth of knowledge it made all so interesting!!

Thank you for making the visit possible. I shall look forward to next year to see Cinerama's How The West Was Won, and Imax 3D.



 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.