|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: 70mm in the roadshow era
|
|
|
Brian D. Whitish
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 103
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 01-16-2007 12:53 AM
Mr. Choate, I just wanted to say how much I enjoy all the work you put into the information you so kindly share with all of us. Sometimes I get a little depressed about the state of exibition today. I started working in theatres in 1979, largely because of the come back of 70mm and good presentation. I have made many trips to LA to visit friends(2 who sound editors, one a screenwriter) gotten to see some memorable presentations. Apocalypse Now and Brainstorm in 70mm at the Cinerama Dome, Pink Floyd The Wall 70mm at the Village, Top Gun 70mm at the Chinese, and others. Here in Seattle I had the thrill of my Theatre life doing one shift of This Is Cinerama, one of How the West was Won in real 3 projector Cinerama. Reading your posts and other info about those great theatres makes feel happy I was a small part of it, and quite lucky to have gotten to see alot during a fine time. When the SRO's, Edwards, and other great chains were building some great facilities and running them with care it makes me long for the days when people who cared ran the business, rather than the bean counters that seem so prevelant today. As witnessed by this forum there are a great many who have a deep and abiding care for the business of running movies and the buildings they show in today. But I cant help but miss the Plitt Century City, the Orange Cinedomes, and other great 750-1500 seat houses with huge screens. Thanks for keeping that alive. I sure appreciate it.
Brian
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 01-19-2007 12:26 AM
Article from Rochester (NY) Democrat and Chronicle
quote:
January 8, 2007
Monroe Theater had glory days
Question: What can you tell me about the history of the Monroe Theater — before it turned into a place showing X-rated movies?
— J.C., Rochester
Answer: A who's who of Rochester turned out when the racing movie Grand Prix opened at the Monroe Theater in February 1967. The 600 attendees included Gilbert McCurdy, Jim Wegman and Police Chief William Lombard, reported Art Griffiths in the Times-Union. However, if it hadn't been for some hurried, last-minute preparations, they might not have seen a movie that night at 585 Monroe Ave. The Cinerama lenses that were used to show the movie, it was discovered, would not fit properly into the projection booth porthole, Griffiths reported. "The limitation cut about 10 feet of movie off the screen. Four workmen worked nearly all day until just before showtime to widen the porthole."
"'It worked,' sighed (theater manager Frank) Bassett between waves to familiar faces among the first nighters."
Those were the days. For nearly 40 years, the Monroe had shown some of the best movies that Hollywood had to offer, and thrived. But by 1967, those days were about to end. In a few more years, no police chief in his right mind would be caught coming to the theater where Sound of Music once had a record-breaking run. Instead, he would be sending in undercover officers to confiscate X-rated movies.
Monroe opened in 1928
The Monroe, designed by Carl Ade, opened as a neighborhood movie house on Jan. 5, 1928, according to information on file at the Rochester Public Library and in a profile by Lloyd Klos of the Rochester Theater Organ Society. The first film it showed was The Magic Flame, starring Samuel Goldwyn's "hottest" screen team at that time, Ronald Colman and Vilma Banky.
That was the era of silent movies, and the Monroe featured a $35,000 three-manual Kohl organ that eventually went to a church in Connecticut and then to Miami's Andre Hall, according to Klos' profile.
Eventually, the theater was equipped with a wide screen, Cinerama and full, six-track Todd-AO Cinemascope to keep pace with innovations.
In 1957, for example, "the sounds of workmen's hammers issuing from inside the Monroe Theater" were "significant heralds of a new era in local motion picture entertainment," the Times-Union reported. The theater was installing a new projector and a bigger, wider screen to accommodate Todd-AO system movies. This would "bring our town into the major leagues of the screen world," the newspaper reported, starting with the local premiere of Around the World in 80 Days. It also would give the 1,000-seat Monroe an edge in competing for similar first-run movies requiring "special handling."
Bassett was all smiles in April 1966, when Sound of Music was still playing at the Monroe after 51 weeks — and after grossing $500,000. Both numbers set new records for local movie theaters, the Times-Union reported. So careful were the projectionists that they were still showing the original 70 mm print they had received at the start of the run. There had been only three breaks in the film during 593 showings.
"The year's run has been bolstered by a great number of theater parties, particularly from area towns where groups rent a school bus, come to the city for dinner and then take in the show," the newspaper noted. Two years later, a re-release of Gone with The Wind completed a 26-week run at the Monroe. In 1969, Funny Girl with Barbra Streisand ran for 48 weeks.
Those, indeed, were the days.
By the mid-1970s, more and more people were flocking to multiscreen movie theaters in the suburbs. "During the past 25 years, about 20 theaters were closed or razed within the city and replaced by newer theaters in suburban shopping centers," Bob Minzesheimer reported in the Democrat and Chronicle in 1976. Of the 11 city theaters left at that point, three were showing X-rated movies.
Bill Benet, former Monroe County legislator, remembers Monroe's better days, when he saw Around the World in 80 Days. He remembers the theater's "nice domed ceiling with a lot of architectural detail to it. It might not have been on the grand scale of the RKO Palace, but it was certainly on that next level."
"There are those of us who still believe that it would be a great renovation project, and that it is still feasible," he added. "Difficult, expensive ... probably. But very feasible."
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|