Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » The Big Boom Mike Debate (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: The Big Boom Mike Debate
Michael Brown
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1522
From: Bradford, England
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 09-15-2002 12:55 PM      Profile for Michael Brown   Email Michael Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bah!

The Moderator of the message board at Nitpickers.com has DELETED my last post and locked the topic as it seems he does not like people who have a differing opinion than his. I belive I even wrote something like "If Brendan (the moderator) wants to have Boom Mikes that Appear ouside the 1.85:1 frame as a Nitpick then he can as this is his site and not mine"

And he still chose to delete my post.

Childish.


 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-15-2002 01:09 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw a boom mic clear as day in trailers for "The Evening Star". Those trailers were framed flat with more top and bottom area. If I remember right, the movie itself was shown in Super35 which cropped the thing out of frame.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeffry L. Johnson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 809
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 09-15-2002 02:25 PM      Profile for Jeffry L. Johnson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeffry L. Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are two shots in the wedding sequence at the beginning of The Rocky Horror Picture Show that were photographed with a 1.85:1 mask. This is quite apparent when you project it at 1.66:1.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Hunter
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 779
From: West Monroe, LA, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 09-15-2002 02:27 PM      Profile for Sam Hunter   Email Sam Hunter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I remember way back when Battlestar Galactica came out in theatres and there were several scenes where the boom mic was clearly visible.
I think that movie would win the most boom mics in a feature award if there were one.

 |  IP: Logged

Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 09-15-2002 06:24 PM      Profile for Charles Everett   Email Charles Everett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Generally, if you see a boom mic the image is not framed properly -- and if anybody tells you otherwise he's full of

Made is 5 reels long in 1.85 flat format. When I saw Made at the Loews New Brunswick in July 2001, the booth fiddled with the framing knob at the start of R5. By doing so the booth chopped off part of the image and made sure (no pun intended) that I could see boom mics. The rating card at the end even got cut in two. After the show I went to the lobby and tried to explain what happened. The employee I talked to -- he was in his teens or early 20's -- told me that was the way it was supposed to be. I have not been back to the Loews New Brunswick since.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 09-15-2002 06:35 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the case of "City by the Sea", which is scope, the framing looked like it was just slightly low but not enough to see splice flashes or anything. It wasn't just the very tip of the mic showing either - you could see most of the mic body drooping down into the frame. I would say I'm surprised nobody else has picked up on this, but then hardly anyone has seen this film (it's that bad).

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 09-15-2002 10:03 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The Moderator of the message board at Nitpickers.com has DELETED my last post

Chin up, Michael. Consider the source. They're too nit-picky, anyway.

------------------
Better Projection Pays!

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 09-15-2002 10:17 PM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
In the case of "City by the Sea", which is scope, the framing looked like it was just slightly low but not enough to see splice flashes or anything. It wasn't just the very tip of the mic showing either - you could see most of the mic body drooping down into the frame. I would say I'm surprised nobody else has picked up on this, but then hardly anyone has seen this film (it's that bad).

Sure it wasn't misframed in your theatre? I saw it the other night and although I wasn't looking for any such mistakes, I saw no boom.

And I liked the film. Not a classic or anything, but an okay film. The only thing I didn't like was that they claimed it was Long Beach, Long Island, but they shot it in Asbury Park, NJ. Long Beach is actually a pretty nice looking place with expensive condos on the beach and even when it was at its worse, it never looked like Asbury Park does now, at least not like it's portrayed in the film.

One of the errors that I've seen in films is that the books they put in people's bookcases don't fit the character. In "Back to the Future," Michael J. Fox's character has "Reference Quarterly" in his headboard when it's more likely that his character would have a comic book.

There's a film coming out called "Phone Booth". You can check out the trailer on the apple web site: http://www.apple.com/trailers/fox/phone_booth/

The film supposedly takes place in Manhattan. But there hasn't been a full length phone booth in Manhattan for over 20 years. Even the 1978 Superman made a joke out of this.

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-16-2002 01:55 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
One of the errors that I've seen in films is that the books they put in people's bookcases don't fit the character. In "Back to the Future," Michael J. Fox's character has "Reference Quarterly" in his headboard when it's more likely that his character would have a comic book.

You mean that people are actually reading & thinking about the titles of prop books on bookshelves in sets now? Great goshamighty if you look, you'll find the people in most movies & plays have massive antique law libraries.


 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-16-2002 04:23 AM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does anyone know WHY directors allow boom mic's in the image?

WELL I'LL TELL YA WHY!!!

It's so that they can see the damn microphone is there and close enough cause they don't trust nobody!!!

DATS WHY!!!

Actually I don't know why, nor do I care. If I see one, for me it matters not. So what. Who cares. It makes me laugh. Hey, I am smart enough to figure out that you need microphones to pick up voices and all. That is unless you can do that in your head, and then I am frightened.

Dave

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Gonzalez
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 790
From: Grand Island , NE USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 09-16-2002 05:48 PM      Profile for Michael Gonzalez   Email Michael Gonzalez   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know Sam I might take that bet. I've seen Jerry Maguire shown out of frame and just about every other scene there is a boom mic present.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.