Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » A good digital photo camera? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: A good digital photo camera?
Aldo Baez
Master Film Handler

Posts: 266
From: USA
Registered: Mar 2001


 - posted 10-31-2002 03:24 AM      Profile for Aldo Baez     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I bought my Canon S30 for 375$ and it takes great pictures.
Pictures of europe are here: here

I know canon just released the s45 which is supposed to be awesome and they have released the s230 which is a 3 megapixel s200. Probably the best tiniest camera you can buy. I'm thinking of trading my s30 for an s230 so nice and small and great pictures.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Haney
Master Film Handler

Posts: 265
From: Cupertino, CA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 10-31-2002 05:16 AM      Profile for Aaron Haney   Email Aaron Haney   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
DP Review (found here) is by far the best digital camera review site I've found. There is a lot of in-depth information in each review, complete with shots of resolution and color charts. Definitely check out their review of any camera you plan to buy.


 |  IP: Logged

Paul Konen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 981
From: Frisco, TX. (North of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-31-2002 08:57 AM      Profile for Paul Konen   Email Paul Konen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I too have a Kodak DC3600 - 2.1 MP. It is able to take video too if you want.

I also got a 128MB Flash memory that allows me to store up to 180 photos before having to dump it to computer.

If you get the easy share, the Lithium battery that comes with it last a good long time, rechargeable NiMH don't last as long and forget about akaline, it eats those as a snack.

Paul

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 12-23-2002 03:42 AM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I forgot to say thanks for all the good suggestions. In the end I bought a Pentax Optio 330 GS for 299 Euro (practically the same in Dollars). It has 3.2 Megapixels and a lot of very nice features. Shooting with the automatic settings gives quite good results and there are a lot of manual options. I treated myself to a 256MB memory card and that lasts for a lot of pictures!
BTW, Aldo, I looked at your galleries and loved the way all pictures are simply called "europe...". It reinforces a common European prejudice that American people can`t tell all the countries here apart... [Wink] Didn`t you go to the top of the Eiffel Tower?

The artefacts around the rigging come from the resizing of the picture. The original is 1200x1600. I resized this with ACDSee, maybe a full blown picture editor does this better, but I haven`t gained much experience yet with picture editors.


 -

 -

This a very peculiar sign. What does it mean? "Caution, Wild Families Crossing"?

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-23-2002 09:05 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I heard on a talk show yesterday that professional digital cameras are going to take a major price drop sometime in the forst quarter of next year. Those 5,000.00 cameras are supposed to become very reasonably priced. Nikon also has a digital body out that one can buy for about 1700.00 that will allow the full use of all of ones Nikon lenses and accessories.
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-23-2002 12:01 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael, Those are beautiful pictures.

As a passing thought, Don't use Microsoft's Paintbrush (any version) to convert JPG's to BMP's or vice-versa. You'll lose alot of resolution. Microsoft's Paintbrush is also horrible for resizing the pictures.

Use a program like Adobe Photoshop 6.0. It really kicks butt! Best I have seen. It'll costs money, but if you do lot of photo work, it is the way to go. it is well worth the investment.

I am not sure what kind of a digi-cam Brad has, but we have all seen pictures from his camera. When my Olympussy dies, I will purcase the type Brad has.

 |  IP: Logged

Aldo Baez
Master Film Handler

Posts: 266
From: USA
Registered: Mar 2001


 - posted 12-23-2002 12:20 PM      Profile for Aldo Baez     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael I apologize. When I loaded my pics onto my pc it automatically named them all Europe.001, .002 I wanted them to be viewable really fast so I just uploaded them. I will take the time to change the names now as I never got around to do it.

 |  IP: Logged

Matthew Bailey
Master Film Handler

Posts: 461
From: Port Arthur,TX
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 12-23-2002 12:23 PM      Profile for Matthew Bailey   Email Matthew Bailey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I found a cheap Vivitar digital camera at Wal-Mart in the high 40.00
renge. It stores 70 some odd pics unlike my Ansco DigiPix which stores no more than 16 pics. [bs] [fu] [thumbsdown]

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 12-23-2002 12:25 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
 -

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 12-24-2005 11:02 AM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 1096 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

Greg Anderson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 766
From: Ogden Valley, Utah
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-24-2005 11:02 AM      Profile for Greg Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I decided to revive this topic because, alas, I have looked at my poor, neglected, 20-year-old 35mm SLR and considered the hassles involved with film processing (and the increasing difficulty in finding a good lab that won't charge an arm-and-a-leg) and, yes, I want a good digital camera now... something around the $500 range would be nice. (And, no, this isn't for Christmas so there's no incredible rush to make a choice.) I don't really want another SLR but I like the idea of something with a 10x optical zoom and stuff like that rather than the 3x point-and-shoot cameras. Any suggestions?

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-24-2005 06:51 PM      Profile for Jason Black   Author's Homepage   Email Jason Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'd recommend spending some time researching at www.stevesdigicams.com

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Wilbert
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 590
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2002


 - posted 12-24-2005 06:59 PM      Profile for Adam Wilbert   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Wilbert   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll second the vote for the nikon coolpix 995 (from three years ago!). I've had mine for a couple of years and love it. The best part is the swiveling body, which allows you to take pictures from knee level or overhead (or even pointing at your own face) and still be able to see the view screen. I haven't seen that design in any of the new cameras and I wouldn't be without it. Taking pictures of little kids without squatting down, or over the tops of crowds without shooting and hoping you're pointing the right direction is a godsend. Can be full manual or full auto, and I'll verify that it can take being dropped onto concrete more than a few times!

 -

I just bought my girlfriend a 7.0mp casio exilim for christmas. She'll be returning from France tonight with it, so we'll see how the pictures came out.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Lensenmayer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1605
From: Upper Arlington, OH
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 12-24-2005 08:44 PM      Profile for Mark Lensenmayer   Email Mark Lensenmayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does anyone have any experience with Panasonic digital cameras? I need a camera that has a large optical zoom and image stabilization. I need to take pictures in some dark environments (auditorium presentations, award ceremonies, etc) and also athletic events (basketball games where flash is not allowed, track meets, football games, etc.). Panasonic, Canon and Kodak offer these features in various models, but the Panasonic gets excellent reviews and is significantly cheaper. I will check out the web reference above for more info, but personal comments are appreciated.

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-24-2005 10:13 PM      Profile for Jason Black   Author's Homepage   Email Jason Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've got a Sony DSC F707 that is, essentially, a HUGE lens attached to teh body of a camera. It's 5 mp, but takes GREat shots.

I also have a 4.1mp DSC S60 that I got for free ninety nine (Thanks again Fox rewards!) that takes pretty good still shots.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.