|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Complete Oscar Nomination List
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pravin Ratnam
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 844
From: Atlanta, GA,USA
Registered: Sep 2002
|
posted 02-12-2003 04:42 AM
Best Picture: CHicago - Shitcago was more like it. My review in the review section pretty much sums my hatred for this movie. If voters were dying to reward a musical, they missed the boat 2 years ago on Hedwig the Angry Inch which had better songs , acting and was visually superior. The Hours: Great acting, average plot. Lame selection. Gangs Of NY: I love scoresese movies, but Gangs of NY was just good. OK selection. Pianist: havent seen it. Will soon. The Two Towers- I liked it a lot and while I think it deserves a nomination, I am not all fanatical about this movie.
Overlooked: Punch Drunk Love, Adaptation. Hell, I wouldnt mind even One Hour Photo or the erratic 25th Hour or the imperfect but very interesting Minority Report over the first 2 movies. Even Catch Me If YOu Can was more entertaining than some of the movies here. If the academy doesn;t mind nominating shallow musicals based on perceived entertainment value, what about action movies?
Best Actors: Liked all the nominees. Glad Gere didnt get it. Wish Sandler or Robin Williams got some consideration. Cage is my favorite on the list. Wouldn't mind DanielDayLewis getting it either despite a hammy performance.
Best Actresses: I thought Streep should have gotten something for the Hours. I thought Streep was a lead in Adaptation. But what do I know. Renee is the only weak nominee here. She was solid at best. she was better in other movies like Nurse betty and Bridget Jones. I find the praise for her baffling. She didn't even look glamorous. Emily Watson was preferable.
Best supporting Actress: No real bad choices here. Kathy Bates and Streep are two excellent choices. I would give the nod to Bates mainly becuase I consider Streep a lead. Once again, not too jazzed about the chicago nods. Zeta Jones did have 2 good song dance performances. Otherwise, she acted pretty much the same way she always has. Queen Latifah was more impressive in Set It Off. She really didnt have much to do in Chicago. I was hoping for at least one of the following to sneak in (not all of them): Samantha Morton from Minority Report, Anna Paquin from 25th Hour, or someone in a similar small but effective performance.
Best Supporting Actor: Cooper is the best of the lot. While he has been great in other movies, he had a different kind of role in adaptation- he exuded charisma in the role. Ed Harris and Walken are desrving too. A lot of good actors here. But this is one area where 25th Hour should have been represented. Barry Pepper(surprisingly, the best presence in the movie) and Phillip Hoffman were both excellent.
Best Director: Spike Jonez got robbed. I wish Paul THomas Anderson was rewarded too. It was nice to see Anderson show some restraint after his last two movies. Scorsese is one of my all time faves, but he was just decent this year. Rob Marshall was better than these guys? Please. No Peter Jackson here? Daldry was not bad, but the choice doesnt nothing for me.
Best Cinematography: This is probably the worst nomination for Chicago. If anything was weak in that movie, it was the less than big musical look that Chicago had. Lots of dull blues like they filmed the broadway play live bored me. Had that stage like look. I wouldnt have given it art direction either. One Hour Photo, Punch Drunk Love and Two Towers were missed here. The clips of Perditiion I did see showed Conrad Hall to be in fine form. Hope he wins it.Maybe Conrad Jr will accept on his late dad's behalf.
Best Song: refreshing to see Eminem song nominated. never thought that would happen after Public Enemy's Fight the Power never had a chance for Do The Right Thing(i think they made that song for the movie first before the album came out). Never heard of the other songs.
Best Score: except for the Hours score, I don't really recall the other scores. Glass made the movie seem more compelling that it actually was.
Costume Design: all the nods seem fine including that of Chicago's.
Screenplays: I really think Adaptation should be considered an original screenplay. It wasn't like the final product we see on screen is an adaptation of the Orchid Thief. The movie is a fictionalized account of the adaptation of the Orchid Thief. The Orchid Thief is just a subplot. Donald kaufman rocks! Too bad he announced himself unavailable for the ceremony.
Foreign Movies: Where is City of God??
| IP: Logged
|
|
Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 02-12-2003 09:07 AM
As a follow-up to Nia Vardalos's nom for original screenplay, from today's L.A. Times:
Vardalos, who was not available for comment Tuesday, has maintained in recent interviews that the screenplay preceded the play.
But in April 2002, Vardalos told Backstage West that she had started with 20 minutes of workshop material and developed it into a one-woman show seen at the Hudson Theater and two other venues. In a Times interview that month, Vardalos said she did not write a screenplay until after she wrote her one-hour stage show. Vardalos said at the time that never in her wildest dreams did she imagine that her one-woman show would become a movie. "Greek Wedding" has gone on to become the highest-grossing independent film ever made.
There are no written rules to determine what qualifies as an adapted or original screenplay. Each studio submits films in the category it prefers, but it is up to the 12-member executive committee of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences' writers' branch to make the final decision on a category. All 409 members of the writers' branch then select the five nominees for each category.
The committee decided "Gangs" was so different from the Asbury book that it could be considered an original screenplay. With "Greek Wedding," the committee decided that Vardalos intended to write the story for a film.
"We are not an investigative body," said one committee member, who requested anonymity. "We are taking her word, and I have no reason to doubt her."
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|