Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Whats The Best Vacuum????? (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Whats The Best Vacuum?????
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 04-02-2003 11:10 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How does Oreck get their vaccum to be so light without cheapening it out? It's like half the weight of most of the other vacs.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 04-04-2003 09:37 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
...but would it withstand this?

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-04-2003 11:30 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I personally prefer a central vac mounted in the garage vented outside.
In the booth I use a hoover portavac

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 05-16-2008 04:55 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 1869 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 05-16-2008 04:55 PM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dysons suck, and not in the good way. The $80 Dirt DEvil up here cleans better than that big yellow turd called dyson. I "vacuumed" with the dyson first then had to go over it again with the dirt devil. It is amzing how a clever commercial can convince people that something works even after they use it. And they have this over heat shut down thing....Why not design it so that it doesn't overheat?????

anyway, if you want a good vacuum, get a KIRBY! I have had a generation 3 kirby for at least 15 years, my mom bought it in the early nineties and gave it to me when I moved out, and that thing still works like new. The impeller has had to be replaced a couple times, but that was from trying to suck up stuff that I shouldn't have.

The only thing that I don't like about Kirby is that you can't buy the bags at the local wal mart or Home Depot. You either have to drive to the Kirby store or order them online.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-16-2008 06:22 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh no... not this thread again! Just so you all know I got rid of the Oreck when I inherited a Hyla... it was Brenda's vaccum. This is by far the best vaccum I've ever used. It is also the very best at picking up our dog's hair when he's shedding.
Highly reccomended!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Tristan Lane
Master Film Handler

Posts: 444
From: Nampa, Idaho
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-17-2008 01:59 AM      Profile for Tristan Lane   Email Tristan Lane   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I used to refurbish Kirby vacuums for my wife's step-dad and I can attest to the quality. They are very expensive, but it is much like buying jewelry. There is a high markup on the vacuums because the sales structure is much like a pyramid scheme.

The body is all aluminum, and the motor is very high quality. I picked up a G4 at a local thrift store. I then put 100 bucks of parts into it to make it look new, buffed the aluminum and had him sell it for me. He sold it for 450 dollars and that's how I got into refurb for him. It was great bread & butter money.

Anyways, Kirby's are good to buy used. The one I bought was pretty trashed, but you can find nice used models in most vacuum stores for around 300 dollars. Parts are mid-range in price but anything is fixable on the machine. Wear parts are mostly the brush-roll, motor brushes, and the transmission. Belts and Bags are much cheaper online than in the kirby stores. Some 3rd party vacuum stores will sell kirby bags as well.

Dyson vacuums are not any better than the other plastic look-alike ones you find a wal-mart. And one true fact still remains, they are made of plastic, with cheap parts, and will only last a few years. If you are going to go with a budget vacuum, go with a Hoover.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 05-17-2008 07:19 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Henry Hoover is apparently very popular in Poland, and is said to be 'ready to go, time and time again'... [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce McGee
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1776
From: Asheville, NC USA... Nowhere in Particular.
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 05-17-2008 10:24 AM      Profile for Bruce McGee   Email Bruce McGee   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've been running my Kirby G3 in the booth for about a year now. It does alot better job than the old Royal Commercial vac did, and it is a bit quieter. That self-propelled transmission on the Kirby makes me feel like I am mowing the grass sometimes.

I FOUND this G3 on the street with a load of junk. All attachments, rug shampooer, etc. were there. I replaced the impeller. Too bad it's not metal like the older ones. We also have a local Kirby distributor who has no problems with getting me any parts that I want. There is a vaccuum cleaner repair business about 1 mile from my home that sells OEM bags. [sleep]

 |  IP: Logged

Jon Miller
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 973
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-17-2008 08:17 PM      Profile for Jon Miller   Email Jon Miller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
The Henry Hoover is apparently very popular in Poland, and is said to be 'ready to go, time and time again'...
That is just plain weird. [Roll Eyes]

Well, it could have been a "Hetty." [Smile] Henry, Hetty, and their brothers and sisters are probably high-quality vacuums and the face motif is quite the gimmick, but there's something just over-the-top strange about a vacuum cleaner that stares back at you in a cartoonish way. [Roll Eyes]

quote: Chris Hipp
Dysons suck, and not in the good way.
Funny how the Dyson seems to receive equal amounts of praise and scorn. I recently got a DC15 "Ball" and it indeed does suck...a softball-sized clod of cat fur and dirt up with each vacuuming; this in a small house with two cats. Impressive enough for me, but it will be interesting to see how all that plastic holds up over time.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Moore
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 188
From: Dover, DE / USA
Registered: Jun 2006


 - posted 05-17-2008 09:51 PM      Profile for Michael Moore   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Moore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We use the 2 stage 14 gallon shop vac by Ridgid.

Not as loud as you think it would be, but with 6 dogs in the house it is the only thing that survived.

We have had Kirby, Oreck, and Hoover,

In fact we had a little Dirt Devil bag less that did a great job, but had a flexible hose design flaw that would clog up!

so we started using shop vacs, and we have found Ridgid to be the best.

Mike

 |  IP: Logged

Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 05-17-2008 10:06 PM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My dad has the Dyson, just the plain yellow base model. He has terrible dust and pollen allergies, and when he got it 4 or 5 years ago, the Kirby he'd had for 20 years was just about dead. He thinks it is fantastic, and he is a very discerning consumer. I always found the ergonomics of it pretty good, and it is certainly better than the cheap Dirt Devil I have now.

 |  IP: Logged

Tristan Lane
Master Film Handler

Posts: 444
From: Nampa, Idaho
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-18-2008 01:58 AM      Profile for Tristan Lane   Email Tristan Lane   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The older Kirby models have less filtration from the use of a thinner bag material, and less fabric. Kirby claims that G4 and up models meet HEPA requirements. They call their technology "micron magic" [Roll Eyes]
In essence, they just added extra filtration to the disposable bag, and the fabric bag.

I agree on the plastic impellers, but unless someone is vacuuming a gravel driveway, they rarely break.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 05-18-2008 05:33 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jon Miller
Henry, Hetty, and their brothers and sisters are probably high-quality vacuums and the face motif is quite the gimmick, but there's something just over-the-top strange about a vacuum cleaner that stares back at you in a cartoonish way.
They're certainly heavy duty. In the last-but-one theatre I worked, two Henrys were in use, one for hoovering each of the auditoria between shows. They were probably running for around an hour a day in total, and hoovering up serious amounts of crud (popcorn etc.) each time. They were bought new when the place opened in 1996, and were still going strong when I left in 1999. They probably had the equivalent of around 10 years of domestic use by then, and were still fine.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.