Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Tim Burton To Remake Charlie And The Chocolate Factory (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Tim Burton To Remake Charlie And The Chocolate Factory
Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-26-2003 01:33 AM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Another example of the "new" Film Makers attempting to re-capture to magic of the original. I HATE that! [thumbsdown] [fu] [bs]

It seems like the current crap of filmmakers (Ooops! I mean "crop") can not think or be creative on their own. There have been too many re-made pics that make me [puke]

This sounds like another! [Mad]

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-26-2003 09:33 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh c'mon Phil, don't give me that horseshit. We have great classics like The Hulk, X2, T3 and the like. You know full well that Hollywood kicks ass and has lots of original products. I'll see you in line for Matrix 3.

 |  IP: Logged

Don Bruechert
Mmmmmmmmm, bird!

Posts: 340
From: Manitowoc, WI, USA
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 05-26-2003 10:58 AM      Profile for Don Bruechert   Author's Homepage   Email Don Bruechert   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I thought the original was kinda cool - I saw it when much younger several times. Now I can watch pieces and parts of it in passing, but don't think I could sit through the whole thing again.

I'm not really sure a remake would add anything to this story, but I DO think that Robin Williams is a much better choice for a "kids" move (i.e. Hook) than Jim Carrey. Williams can be a pig, but he has a wide variety of talents and the ability to deliver emotional content, where Carrey is mostly dufusy humor. Even when he (Carrey) tries to deliver serious emotional content you can tell he is "acting", where Williams seems much more genuine.

If this came to the screen and I had to pay money to see it I would probably wait for it to come out on Cable or something.

 |  IP: Logged

Christopher Seo
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 530
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-26-2003 12:45 PM      Profile for Christopher Seo   Email Christopher Seo   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked the original movie well enough, but I thought Gene Wilder was considerably more psychotic and maniacal as Wonka than the book had portrayed. Robin Williams would indeed do better than Jim Carrey and probably better than Gene Wilder as well. But at any rate, the true classic is the book (and all of Roald Dahl's books). Movie adaptations of even children's books never seem to capture the intelligence and maturity behind the story.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-26-2003 01:06 PM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
FYI...

Tim Burton has just signed on to the project. There has been no formal casting and all "rumors" are just that.

This will not be a remake, nor will it be a "re-imagining" like his planet of the apes film. He is given explicit authorization from the family estate that controls the novels to write it to his own contention, cast as he sees fit, and direct to his own will. He has full creative control and there will be no studio fudging with the project as that will allow the family estate to pull the project and kill the film.

This will truly be a signature Burton film, even though it already is a classic in Gene Wilder form. Don't count of Robin Williams or Jim Carrey to be cast in the film, as they will likely carry creative controls on the project that would counter the authors family wishes and the creative controls of Tim Burton.

Instead, look for another well known face that is more willing to work for less money, take total creative input from the director, and can fit the role with ease... Perhaps Jude Law?

Dave

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-26-2003 01:25 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh, forgot myself there for a minute... that'll mean Johnny Depp as Wonka. And it'll be full of Burton's obsession with darkness and death.

Don, you make a good point about Williams being able to deliver emotionally. That's exactly why I thought he could work... even though I don't care for him personally.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-26-2003 01:49 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Joe, you're right. I was generalizing and I should have been more specific. There are indeed some very creative and great original films produced in the last decade by Hollywood as well as Foreign films and independents.

I was thinking more along the lines of what I consider lousy remakes of "the original", even though some of those "originals" are based on other films or even remakes themselves:

KING KONG (1933) remade in 1976 ...maybe again in 2005
THE NUTTY PROFESSOR (1963) remade in 1996
THE OUT OF TOWNERS (1970) remade in 1999
POSTMAN ALWAYS RINGS TWICE (1946) remade in 1981
PSYCHO (1960) remade in 1998
THE BIG SLEEP (1946) remade in 1978

...and many others.

I don't know why I almost always think less of a remake than the original. Maybe it's cuz I'm "used to" the original. In some cases, it seems the remake tries too hard to be "up-to-date" in language/swearing/technology and it just doesn't play well to me.

The only remake that I liked that come to mind is THE BIRDCAGE which I thought was better than the original LA CAGE AUX FOLLES.

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-26-2003 03:12 PM      Profile for Aaron Sisemore   Email Aaron Sisemore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
And it'll be full of Burton's obsession with darkness and death.
Which gives perfect validity to Burton's original first choice for the role of Wonka... Marilyn Manson. and all of the colorful wonder of the factory will look more like the Haunted Mansion... [Frown]

-Aaron

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-26-2003 06:23 PM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh great.... Willy Wonka Meets Beetlejuice! [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Dan Lyons
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 698
From: Seal Beach, CA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 05-26-2003 06:59 PM      Profile for Dan Lyons   Email Dan Lyons   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Phil wrote:
quote:
I was thinking more along the lines of what I consider lousy remakes of "the original", even though some of those "originals" are based on other films or even remakes themselves:

KING KONG (1933) remade in 1976 ...maybe again in 2005
THE NUTTY PROFESSOR (1963) remade in 1996
THE OUT OF TOWNERS (1970) remade in 1999
POSTMAN ALWAYS RINGS TWICE (1946) remade in 1981
PSYCHO (1960) remade in 1998
THE BIG SLEEP (1946) remade in 1978

...and many others.

Let's not forgot the 1976 version of "A Star is Born"! [Wink]

I think I'm the only person in the world that actually likes Barbra's version. [thumbsup] The songs are great; but that's really the only good part about it!

Danny

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Gonzalez
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 790
From: Grand Island , NE USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 07-26-2003 10:01 PM      Profile for Michael Gonzalez   Email Michael Gonzalez   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tim Reed wrote:

---------------------------------------------------------------
"Oh, forgot myself there for a minute... that'll mean Johnny Depp as Wonka. And it'll be full of Burton's obsession with darkness and death."
---------------------------------------------------------------

Johnny Depp Leading Candidate To Play Willy Wonka

Pirates of the Caribbean star frontrunner for remake...

Johnny Depp is the leading candidate to play Willy Wonka in the upcoming remake of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. Tim Burton will be directing the remake which will be titled Charlie & The Chocolate Factory.

Credit: Variety

Well Tim it appears that you may be correct [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 07-26-2003 11:06 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey, Michael! What do ya know about that? I guess you can judge a book by its cover. [Wink]

[Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Robb Johnston
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 147
From: St. Louis Suburbs
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 07-27-2003 12:54 PM      Profile for Robb Johnston   Author's Homepage   Email Robb Johnston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Daryl,

I don't think that the movie was a combination of the 2 books. If I recall, Great Glass Elevator begins with the Elevator landing at Charlie's house and recounts the adventures that Wonka, charlie and his whole family experience, including a visit to the land where the Oompa Loompas come from. I think there was even a run in with a Voracious Knid, or whatever it was called. It has been at least 15-18 years since I read it.

They just thought that Willie Wonka made for a better title than Charlie . . .

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.