|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Roy mauled by Tiger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 10-07-2003 09:53 AM
quote: Although I also read that the show was incredibly profitable for the Mirage.
Here's just how profitable. From the Los Angeles Times. (registration required to view this site).
Closure of Siegfried & Roy Show to Hurt MGM Mirage's Profit From Bloomberg News
October 7, 2003
MGM Mirage's annual profit may be cut as much as 10 cents a share because the company closed its Siegfried & Roy show after magician Roy Horn was attacked by a tiger Friday, Deutsche Bank analyst Marc Falcone said.
But the company's stock held up relatively well Monday: It eased 35 cents, or 1%, to $36.48 on the New York Stock Exchange.
Horn, 59, was bitten in the neck by a 600-pound white tiger during a performance at the Mirage hotel and casino in Las Vegas. Horn remains in critical condition, said Cheryl Persinger, a spokeswoman for University Medical Center in Las Vegas.
The show, featuring illusions with tigers and other animals, has been canceled indefinitely, MGM spokesman Alan Feldman said.
Siegfried & Roy's six weekly shows always sold out at the Mirage's 1,504-seat theater, Feldman has said.
Analysts estimated that MGM Mirage got less than half the revenue from the sale of the $110.50 show tickets. But the Mirage will lose restaurant, casino and retail revenue from guests who would have seen the show, Falcone said.
"It's been an outstanding and very successful show," Falcone said. He estimated that the loss of the show would cut the company's annual profit by 5 cents to 10 cents a share.
MGM Mirage had been forecast to post a profit of $1.49 a share in 2003 and $1.77 in 2004, based on the consensus estimates of analysts in a Thomson First Call survey.
The company gets two-thirds of its profit from its Las Vegas casinos, including the Mirage, Bellagio and MGM Grand.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-08-2003 01:57 AM
Huh. When I was your age, they didn't even HAVE orangoutangs. You'd go to most zoos, & they'd have a cage with an open door in the back cinder block wall, no orangoutang. The tour guides would say, "Oh, he must be asleep!" or "I guess he just doesn't want to come out today, but he was out playing all day yesterday!" in that irritating story-lady talking to kindergarteners voice. If you went to a zoo in the big city, they would have chimpanzees with their hair bleached out so that it was orange, put in these scaled-down habitats with tiny bushes, rocks, etc., and they kept the visitors farther back to mess with the scale by putting a stretch of land, a ditch, & a fence between. Sometimes they'd have a morbidly obese chimpanzee, & that would get closer to the correct proportions, but you could still tell. Especially when some guy would smuggle in a banana & throw it over into the habitat; the monkey would pick it up and the banana would be bigger than the monkey's head. Everybody knew it was a scam.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|