|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Ripping off "Gladiator" music
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 11-13-2003 05:36 AM
quote:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note that "originality" isn't included in your assessment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That was the point of the whole post
I was going to ignore the descent into puerility & ego conservation, but as long as it's deteriorated into Godzilla vs. the Smog Monster, what the hey.
You have a need for your defense of Williams to define creativity in a way which excludes meaningful originality, which is what the point was - that Williams stuff is unoriginal. You can make a photocopy of a piece of sheet music, the result is a new thing, but it's not new music unless you play with words to the point of absurdity. I'm very appreciative of works which don't have to be declared completely original to have their own merit: in the big band era, bands used to have their own arrangements of hits which were themselves distinct; new classical recordings are mostly of a limited number of works. The difference is that they do not claim aspects of their work as distinctly their own, as in the composition of a new score.
quote: Define "originality".
In this Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary: "1: the quality or state of being original. 2: freshness of aspect, design, or style 3: the power of independent thought or constructive imagination"
2 & 3 do NOT describe the work of John Williams. It describes the work of many other film composers, Waxman, Steiner, Davis, more. It is not the description of a score through all of which you hear & think "Where have I heard this before?"
quote: Where did Williams steal the Star Wars theme from?
Steal is a word that's so ugly & legally actionable by people with boatloads of lawyers & money.
Here's a link to a CD & audio clip on Amazon of a symphonic suite arranged from Erich Wolfgang Korngold's score for King's Row http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000003TF5/qid=1068717087/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_2/102-5673317-8928137 ?v=glance&s=music&n=507846
Well, listen to that! And it's just the walkup & the HOOK, the hardest, most significant part to write. That's all. In the Star Wars theme, what happens then? Turns the walkup around, repeats the hook, then does the whole thing over. Such a bog-standard method for writing a variation or completing a line that composers AVOID using it. The technique itself is so hoary that it is itself as recognizable as any particular line.
Williams mentioned after Star Wars (not "busted") that he was "influenced" by Korngold. That in particular, in this case! Not composed in the manner of, or with a quotation from, but via a lift. So who else would Williams have been influenced by? Steiner, Waxman, Rosza? He only sounds like them when he pulls pieces from them. It's not work in an idiom, it's like PDQ Bach without the honest, acknowledging wink. His scores are chunks from other things, with variations that are transparent enough to maintain as much as possible of the effectiveness of the originals. Waxman's scores didn't sound like Riesenfeld, they sounded like Waxman; same for Steiner, Davis, start picking some more respected, original composers. Williams' scores are salvage yard bolt & weld-ups, like the car Johnny Cash assembled in One Piece At A Time.
quote: That which you do revisits you threefold
Ha, ha, Gracia! I eat only chocolate & no high fiber foods, & as it is written, you cannot make bricks without straw.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Schaffer
"Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002
|
posted 11-27-2003 01:36 AM
Which part of "Mars - Bringer of War" did you match up to which part of "Star Wars"? That is quite a feat, considering that the opening theme in "SW" is in 4, and "Mars" is in 5 beats throughout. "The Planets", a marvellous orchestral showpiece and nothing but pure fun to listen to (provided the orchestra is up to the task, some of the parts are enormously difficult to play), itself "borrows" heavily from other music of the late 19th and early 20th century - Debussy, Ravel, Strauss, Stravinsky, Saint-Saens, Dukas, and others. Holst has also been accused of "stealing" from other composers. I prefer to see it as a brilliant anthology of late romantic orchestral techniques.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|