Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Creating a Theatre Website (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Creating a Theatre Website
Joshua Lott
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 246
From: Fairbanks, AK, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-23-2003 10:27 PM      Profile for Joshua Lott   Author's Homepage   Email Joshua Lott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I do like the Rialto Cinema website.

What are the thoughts on Black background/ White backgroung?

I do not want a counter on the website. I do only want the information for statistical purposes. My own pleasure. [Smile]

There will be NO banner ads, popups, or flash (I don't know how to program flash).

As to various browsers. What browsers should I test the website to? I know Opera, Netscape, and Explorer. Are there others? I will not be able to test on a Mac, as I do not have one.

What are thoughts on PayPal? I do want to offer Gift Certificates and Tickets online, but I can't stand fandango.

Once I finally get the website up I will let everyone here know so they can pic it apart to see what is good/bad with it.

Thanks

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-24-2003 12:04 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
White background versus black backgrounds? Text is a lot easier to read on a white or light colored background. You don't have to apply this on all pages. But do be kind and use white backgrounds in fields where you have paragraphs of text to display.

You should test your site with Internet Explorer and Netscape. Opera is also gaining popularity. Other browsers include Mozilla, Safari (Mac), Konqueror (Linux), Amaya (the W3C's browser), Camino (formerly Chimera). ISPs like SBC/Yahoo! are even making their own web browsers. You'll do fine to test in the first two or three mentioned. There's just not enough time in the world to test in many more than that (although you could since most are free).

The Mac versus PC thing is a fairly big issue affecting web design. Macs display colors lighter than PCs, so you may have to balance the look of your images. Applications like Photoshop and Fireworks can simulate both Mac and PC gamma on a single machine. Font handling and choices are different too. This will be a big consideration if you mess around with more advanced things like Cascading Style Sheets ("CSS").

Pay Pal? Well, I'm not a big eBay junkie. And generally I'm just not into doing any Internet-based pay online systems. When I order items online, I prefer to pick up the phone and call in the order. Even with my anti-virus DATs auto-updated, anti-spyware tools running and my computer sitting behind both a hardware firewall (my router) and software firewall (ZoneAlarm) I still don't trust punching in any keystrokes of credit card numbers or any other personal information. I treat my computer as if everyone else in the world can see what I am doing on it. Paranoid perhaps, but safe.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-24-2003 02:30 AM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
I typically test websites on the following browsers and versions:
  • Internet Explorer 6.0
  • Netscape 7.1
  • Opera 6.0
  • Opera 7.11
  • Netscape 4.08 (because it's handling of tables and style sheets is so horrible, if you get it to work in 4.08 it'll probably work in *anything*)
  • every once in a while I'll swipe my projectionist's Mac laptop for a minute and glance at the sites with Safari
Keep in mind if you plan on your viewers to print anything out (showtimes, coupons, etc.), most browsers only do about 640 pixels wide to the printer before stuff starts getting cut off.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-24-2003 01:27 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A black background is OK if you don't use dark colors for body text. Especially don't use purple or dark blue. Use white or yellow or light colors in general.

And make the text large enough.

I really like the way the Rialto site has complete movie info on the front page. I'm going to do that with our site. We have the showtimes on the front now, with a link to "more information," but I guess it is true that most people are looking for movie information, so it should be right up front.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 12-24-2003 01:40 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One annoying website practice: you type in the URL, and the first thing you see is...

"Welcome to Joe Blow's Website! Click to Enter"

When I typed the URL, I expected to enter already! Why make everyone go through a stupid, unnecessary screen?! Get to the point!

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-24-2003 11:59 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Such enter screens are a waste of time unless there is a point to them -the main point being a notification of what plug ins and other stuff the site uses, or making it as a jump point between a broadband heavy graphics version or "lite" version of the site.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 12-26-2003 01:06 PM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Such welcome screens are also a very good way to make sure that search engines don't rank you very highly. Cut to the chase and don't waste your visitors' time, and you will also be rewarded with valuable search engine ranks that are appropriate to the relevance of your site.

I used to do the colored backgrounds, and BigScreen once had a dark blue background with white text. I even experimented with different colors and/or subtle patterns that varied with the section that you were in, but all-in-all, black text on white is how people have been viewing text for years, and messing with that means that you're going to lose some effectiveness to your site.

Another highly recommmended thing to do, is to follow conventions for coloring of links and allowing the browser to choose whether to underline them or not. I dislike sites that make their links the same color as the body text, since I set my browser to not have links underlined. I'm also annoyed by sites that force all links to be underlined. If I wanted them underlined, I would have set that option in my browser!

Currently, I have movie information on the same page as the showtimes. The movie information is at the top, followed by the showtimes below. I've been using this layout for all nine years (nine years in January anyway), and it has worked well.

Showtimes Page for Cold Mountain

We also have a separate page for printable showtimes, since what works for viewing doesn't necessarily translate well when printed. We also want to make sure that the showtimes print on a single page whenever possible, so only basic movie information is on the printable page.

Printable Showtimes Page for Cold Mountain

This printable page also has the side benefit of being very compatible with AvantGo users and mobile wireless devices.

PayPal is a hit-and-miss situation. I think people who already have PayPal accounts will have no problem paying for tickets with PayPal. Those that don't, however, will probably not want to sign up just to order tickets online. Unfortunately, there's no cheap way to accept Credit Cards online, so your overhead will be high for that option.

I do compatibility testing with IE 6, Mozilla 1.5, and Netscape 4.77. The latter is only when I am doing something that I know will make NS 4.77 a little touchy. This list is a result of knowing how most browsers will display the code that I write, based on the years of experience I have with doing so. If you are new to this, and especially if you are using a program to generate code (like FrontPage), you're going to want to be more vigilant to make sure that you're not insulting those that don't use IE.

I've always said that I would love to do more compatibility testing with the Mac platform, but so far, Apple has ignored my requests for an evaluation sample. [Big Grin]

As you can tell by all the issues involved, designing good web sites is not simple and straightforward. Sure, everyone can create a web page, but not everyone should...

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis Atkinson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 129
From: Birch Run Michigan
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 12-27-2003 08:47 AM      Profile for Dennis Atkinson   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Atkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I like and use www.sitehost4u.com
for easy info/stats menu. I'm sure everyone has a favorite.

Adam, you should try www.webstudio.com for a free download.
The latest version of webstudio is too easy to use!

Dennis

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-27-2003 09:12 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
All web design software sucks. It should be called bloatware. For instance Web Studio's plain-Jane homepage weighs in at a whopping 52K and it's mostly text! Notepad rules.

 |  IP: Logged

Joshua Lott
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 246
From: Fairbanks, AK, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-28-2003 05:31 PM      Profile for Joshua Lott   Author's Homepage   Email Joshua Lott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Adam,

You offering to write my website for me in notepad? [Wink]

To all:

Anyways... I have a friend that will probably do this website for me in Dreamweaver.

I do want my website to resize to the persons browser. Is this possible?

Bobby Said:

quote:
Most computer users have small to medium sized monitors running at no more than 800 X 600 pixels.
So should I have it designed to 800x600? I don't like to have to scroll side to side to look at a web site. It should fit in the width of the screen. This is a personally opion and maybe not what the general public is used to. I am creating the website for them, not me.

I am running my screen at 1024 x 768 and I like how Film-Tech looks even if I pull the frame over that is around the navigation and chat info.

I am personally thinking about going with a website that has a header similar to cinematour.com with the logo on the left and links to the right.

Front page would have all the current releases summary and showtimes with link to purchase tickets.

Any additional thoughts?

 |  IP: Logged

Ray Brown
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 111
From: Dayton, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 12-28-2003 06:32 PM      Profile for Ray Brown   Author's Homepage   Email Ray Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I do want my website to resize to the persons browser. Is this possible?
I haven't seen any scripts that redirect according to your screens resolution. Someone who knows more about Java script might be able to answer that or write a script for you.

Running individual pages for each resolution size, or type of browser seems like a real pain in the butt to me, especially when you are updating at least once a week but that's just my opinion and I like keeping things as simple as possible.

I designed ours at 800x600 since it is the default setting in Windows and 60% of our visitors use this setting so that is what I'm staying with even though I prefer 1024x768 for my own pc.

For web editors I prefer Dreamweaver. Very spendy but creates really clean code compared to Front Page. I also like the split screen where you can have your source code and the wysiwyg showing at the same time. Sometimes you have to go in to the source code and "tweak" it when you can't get the wysiwyg to do what you want and this feature really comes in handy.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-28-2003 07:05 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's another design tip for properly designing for medium to small-ish computer screen desktops. Certainly you want to make the site work on a 800 X 600 desktop. But you also have to bear in mind the browser's user interface (or "chrome") is going to consume a pretty good amount of pixels. In general I limit the horizontal spread of a layout to 740 or 750 pixels.

Use the print screen function to copy chromes of popular web browsers to the clipboard and use those screen shots as frames for your layouts.

The "liquid" design technique can get around lots of monitor and desktop setting issues. Basically you have a table design that automatically expands to the width of the browser window. You can make parts of a liquid layout fixed while other parts expand to gain more visual control of the layout.

Cascading Style Sheets raises issues at the other end of the monitor spectrum. CSS allows you to use certain fonts and specify sizes in pixels and more. Generally I prefer the look of sites that use CSS. But the text needs to be designed so it is readable on high rez desktops. If I can't read the text on a 1600 X 1200 or 1900 X 1440 desktop then it will probably be too small for people with limited vision using average sized monitors to read as well.

 |  IP: Logged

Gunnar Johansson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 181
From: Gothenburg, Sweden
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 12-29-2003 12:06 PM      Profile for Gunnar Johansson   Author's Homepage   Email Gunnar Johansson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Running individual pages for each resolution size, or type of browser seems like a real pain in the butt to me, especially when you are updating at least once a week but that's just my opinion and I like keeping things as simple as possible.

But it doesnīt have to be. Without to much work you can do it with databases and asp, or php, to get easy to maintain, entering information once and get it displayed wherever relevant. Notepad isnīt to bad, but updating at least movies, and maybe showtimes, Iīd rather build an interface dynamically, so I can input data by maybe logging in, rather than editing html in notepad and uploading. Especially if you want to delegate so more people can enter information.
Look into MSSQL and ASP (basically what Iīm most familar with and know it works, having tons of trouble getting MSSQL and PHP to work properly on Linux a while back).
Granted Iīm not to sure how this does with slow modems and other browsers... Hope I helped, made sense and Iīm sorry I canīt direct you to a good example.

Iīm expanding on the subject, agreeing with most posts above, but like to add that it should be easy to maintain and look good a while from now. Iīve seen plenty of siteīs which looked good and cool once, and they donīt now. And sites that never get updated with relevant information. Build a good solid structure and foundation that you know will last (HTML will most likely work for a while longer) and as a general advice make sure you comment your code, so you know whatīs what when you go back, or when the next guy is trying to do something (another reason for easy maintanence). This doesnīt negate anything else, just start thinking about before you do anything (as opposed to after). Hope this helped som more, and good luck.
(Edit spelling mistakes and last paragraph)

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 12-29-2003 02:18 PM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
BigScreen does what you're looking for, Joshua. While the navigation at the top does not go all the way down to 640 wide-browsers (that element lets you get down to 712 wide before scrolling), the content itself does stretch to fit any available width.

It's not difficult to do this, just stay away from manually setting the widths of the tables that contain your content. You can specify widths of certain columns, but if you specify a table width or if you specify the width of every column, you are going to run into trouble where it won't fit a majority of browsers, whether they are wide or narrow.

FrontPage likes to pull crap like that, and it's one of the dead give-aways of an amatuer job when I evaluate sites for customers.

You said that your friend will be using Dreamweaver to create your site. In my experience, DW can be used to create very clean sites, but I've never let it generate a page that was created using just the visual layout tools (affectionately referred to as "web design for dummies").

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-29-2003 06:13 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The problem with Dreamweaver (particuarly the MX version) is the program's "layout view", an alternative to the app's much more reliable "standard view." Macromedia developed this as an "easy mode" for newcomers to design web pages. In reality it is a feature to avoid. DWMX Layout view auto-generates many levels of nested tables to achieve that WYSIWYG appearance. The feature works, but good luck going back and editing the content. Such auto-generated pages are impossible to edit within text-based editors and they're a real pain to deal with even if you're working within the confines of DWMX itself.

Adobe GoLive has a similar feature in their "layout grid". I have to admit there have been times where I have caved in to using this feature, but I would follow up with typing in remarks in the HTML file to say when the layout grid began and ended.

I still prefer DreamweaverMX above all other graphically oriented web design applications. I work in the two-pane Standard View (the HTML code is placed in a window above and the layout appears in a window below). I wish GoLive offered it. You can click an entry point in the HTML text window and it will select items within the layout window below. No need for zooming or manually pulling things around to get the item you want selected. And you're not having to tab back and forth between totally separate views. In addition, the DWMX two pane view gives users interactive feedback between the layout and HTML so you actually learn more about how HTML works as you design (and you have those reference tabs off to the right to describe how every tag works). There's lots of other stuff in DWMX that just gets work done faster.

I haven't tried GoLiveCS yet. I hear it has a really nice "visual CSS" editor.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.