|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Best bond film
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Schaffer
"Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002
|
posted 01-05-2004 10:37 PM
Here is some interesting background from imdb:
Lazenby was working in Paris, France as the top male super-model on the Paris runways at the time Connery made his announcement. Since Lazenby was out of England at the time, and did not speak French, he had no idea Connery had even quit. George did not learn that his idol would no longer be Bond until he returned to London two weeks later.
Meanwhile, Cubby Broccoli remembered a man he’d seen at a hairdresser 3 years previously. At the time he’d thought what a good Bond he might make, had discovered he was a model and had made a note of his name. Now he called him in for a screen test. Lazenby performed excellently during a fight sequence, impressed both producers and United Artists and was duly signed for the role. During filming, he became increasingly difficult to work with and alienated the crew. Broccoli and Saltzman became upset with their star's ego and attitude. On five separate occasions during filming, Broccoli approached Lazenby with a seven Bond movie/five non-Bond movie deal and Lazenby declined each time. This wore very thin on Broccoli's patience.
On December 18th, 1969, On Her Majesty's Secret Service premiered. Finally, the world saw the second James Bond. Lazenby showed up at the premiere with long hair and a beard, which greatly angered Broccoli. Then Lazenby's publicist announced at the premiere that George would not make another Bond film, making Secret Service his only Bond movie. When Broccoli and Saltzman heard this, Lazenby was released from his contract which still had another year on it.
Lazenby then took off on a trip to sail around the world for a year on his newly purchased yacht. Lazenby's agent told him there would be dozens of movie offers waiting for him on his desk when he got back. During the year Lazenby was gone, On Her Majesty's Secret Service became the second lowest grossing of the six Bond films to date, and Cubby Broccoli allegedly told just about every producer in The United Kingdom and United States that he was absolutely impossible to deal with.
He returned to London in early 1971 and found zero movie offers on his agent's desk. He also found that he could not get a role or even an interview as seemingly no one wanted to work with him. UA had meanwhile black-listed Lazenby in a public relations effort to make the public believe Secret Service had a lower Bond movie gross because of George. The public was making an outcry for Sean Connery to return as Bond, and George had spent nearly all of his money on his year long trip.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hillary Charles
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 748
From: York, PA, USA
Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 01-06-2004 08:21 AM
Love the link to Piz Gloria! When I worked in the photo lab, everyone in the store heard me yelp when a customer's roll of prints came out of the drier. They were there! When the customer saw how excited I was about it, they allowed me to make a couple duplicates for my "collection." It's cool the name "Piz Gloria" was retained.
I really enjoy all the Bond movies. Even the non-official ones, "Casino Royale" and "Never Say Never Again" have much to offer. I amazed John the week between Christmas and New Year when Spike TV ran the Bonds. I told him that if he flips on to that channel, I WILL NAME THE TITLE OF THE MOVIE WITHIN TWO SECONDS. Any shot, any scene, anywhere in the movie. I was able to do it 100% of the time, usually within one second. He said it would be nice if I could turn that ability into money. Had I known "Beat the Geeks" would have had a Bond Geek, I would have tried out to challenge him.
Oh yeah, I've got the OHMSS one-sheet hanging up as part of our holiday decorations. Groovy!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|